• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Additional overhead of 256 bit vs 128 bit SSL

AgentZap

Senior member
I've heard in the past that there is a performance cost associated with running a website with a 256 bit certificate vs a 128 bit one. Does anyone know of any good articles or whitepapers on the subject? Thanks
 
Googling found this:
http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~bhuyan/papers/ssl.pdf

There's some nice tables starting on page 6 that gives you what you want. They do comparisons for 128-bit AES vs. 256-bit AES, DES (56-bit) vs. 3DES (168-bit), 512-bit RSA vs. 1024-bit RSA, and MD5 vs. SHA-1.

Interesting tidbit from their conclusion:
70% of the processing time of an HTTPS transaction is spent doing SSL processing.
 
Back
Top