ACORN CEO: 'I'm young, I'm Democratic, and I'm a socialist,' is all right with me.

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,181
18,839
146
Well... At least SOMEONE on the left admits they are socialist.

I wonder why the rest won't?

ACORN CEO: Tea Parties a 'Bowel Movement,' Future Will Be Worse Than Segregation

FOXNews.com

McCarthyism? Jim Crow? Segregation? Japanese internment?

Child's play. ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis says the times people are living in now will "dwarf" all those stains on America's history. And she points to the Tea Party movement -- or "bowel movement," in her words -- as a harbinger of the persecution to come.

"They are coming. And they are coming after you," the embattled head of ACORN said during a talk last month to the Young Democratic Socialists, the youth branch of the Democratic Socialists, the U.S. branch of the Socialist International.

During the address, Lewis praised the group's members for calling themselves socialists, and warned that undefined forces are plotting their doom.

"Any group that says, 'I'm young, I'm Democratic, and I'm a socialist,' is all right with me. You know that's no light thing to do -- to actually say, I'm a socialist -- because you guys know right now we are living in a time which is going to dwarf the McCarthy era. It is going to dwarf the internment during World War II. We are right now in a time that is going to dwarf the era of Jim Crow and segregation," Lewis said.

Lewis went on to explain that she wasn't exaggerating -- just look at the Tea Parties, she reasoned.

"This is not rhetoric or hyperbole -- this is real," Lewis said. "This rise of this Tea Party so-called movement -- bowel movement in my estimation -- and this blatant uncovering and ripping off the mask of racism."

She urged the members to get as active as they possibly can to "build this institution."

The comments come as ACORN, once a massive, multi-million-dollar community advocacy group, is coming apart at the seams. The group has been beset by a tidal wave of bad publicity over the past year and attempts by the federal government to revoke taxpayer funding.

She told The Associated Press on Tuesday that the group is "on life support" -- shortly before a federal appeals court temporarily blocked a judge's ruling that it was unconstitutional for Congress to block funding to the group.

U.S. District Judge Nina Gershon has ruled twice that the congressional cutoff was unconstitutional, prompting the Obama administration to notify agency heads of the decision while it seeks an appeal.

But the court ruling this week grants a stay on the reversal until full arguments on the issue can be heard during the summer.

The group has long dealt with controversy over charges of embezzlement and voter registration fraud, but the tipping point came last year when undercover videos at local ACORN offices showed employees appearing to offer tax advice to a couple posing as a pimp and prostitute.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,566
126
i'm fairly certain that fox is using the wrong 'Democratic.' they should be using 'democratic.' that's probably intentional.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,566
126
Any guess on which way she, and every damn person in that room voted?

It's valid.

not in that usage it isn't.

and half of them probably voted for ralph nader or cynthia mckinney, green party candidate.
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
LOL @ Tea Party's a 'Bowel Movement'

Gotta go with +1 there. Does that make me a socialist?


I do like to have a good time :)




--
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,566
126
they got 900,000 votes between the two of them. and i'm guessing the US branch of the socialist international has a lot fewer people in it than tea party goers. is lyndon larouche still running? i'll bet he got some votes from that crowd.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
they got 900,000 votes between the two of them. and i'm guessing the US branch of the socialist international has a lot fewer people in it than tea party goers. is lyndon larouche still running? i'll bet he got some votes from that crowd.

I suspect your numbers are correct. Not sure about LaRouche though. We used to have a poster here that would talk about him almost nonstop. I'm sure he would know.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
what's wrong with being a socialist?

Nothing at all. as long as you are not a part of the federal government and your goal is to make it so others can have a piece of my pie without lifting a finger... and to give them that piece of my pie you filter it though a horrendously inept and inefficient government... then it becomes a problem.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,181
18,839
146
I suspect your numbers are correct. Not sure about LaRouche though. We used to have a poster here that would talk about him almost nonstop. I'm sure he would know.

Well, considering the fact that ALL the major players of the DSA not only backed Obama, but supported him in Illinois as well I'd say he's wrong.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,566
126
that's great, but Democratic refers to a specific political party. and she was not addressing a gathering of that specific political party, even if people there at the meeting voted overwhelming for the Democratic party.

it's a simple rule of the english language. posters here i wouldn't expect to know the difference, but someone who went to journalism school undoubtedly does.

edit:
Young Democratic Socialists announces their National Conference March 5-7 with Cornel West, Gayatri Spivak and more:
Democratic Socialism: A Real Change for a Change.
that last line makes them look like huge obama fans.
 
Last edited:

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
Well... At least SOMEONE on the left admits they are socialist.

I wonder why the rest won't?

Socialists are a subset of leftists just as raging anti-ACORN idiots are a subset of righties.
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
that's great, but Democratic refers to a specific political party. and she was not addressing a gathering of that specific political party, even if people there at the meeting voted overwhelming for the Democratic party.

it's a simple rule of the english language. posters here i wouldn't expect to know the difference, but someone who went to journalism school undoubtedly does.

edit:

that last line makes them look like huge obama fans.

You also capitalize proper names and titles. Young Democratic Socialists sounds like a proper name. Democratic Socialism: A Real Change for a Change looks like the title.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
Nothing at all. as long as you are not a part of the federal government and your goal is to make it so others can have a piece of my pie without lifting a finger... and to give them that piece of my pie you filter it though a horrendously inept and inefficient government... then it becomes a problem.

Sure, just as soon you can prove you were born full grown in the wilderness and acquired all your pie by pounding two rocks together.