• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

According to Tom's Hardware, the 3.4E is SUCH a disappointment in games.

Im no fan of any AMD/Intel camp, but the P4E isnt that bad. Tom forgets that this cpu, like most P4C's, work better at high clockspeeds.

Technically speaking, the P4E could have been a failiure with such a huge x86 pipeline. Not too sure what Intel did, it cant be just branch predictor improvements + 1mbyte of cache that causes such improvements, but its highly impressive...
 
Wow the P4's are really fast in encoding! (I thought it was small, but its from 30 secs to a whole minute and a half!😀)
 
No matter how the benchmarks are skewed the A64 will beat the P4EE in gaming and is also much cheaper! P4EE isn't horrible but for the price, I think Intel could've given gamers a lot more to look forward to.
 
Originally posted by: Delorian
No matter how the benchmarks are skewed the A64 will beat the P4EE in gaming and is also much cheaper! P4EE isn't horrible but for the price, I think Intel could've given gamers a lot more to look forward to.
Click to expand...
They are talking about the Prescott, which is the P4E, not the P4C-EE (that just stands for Extreme Edition, it seems).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top