One was something she allegedly said, the other was a quote. Accordingly, I responded to them differently. I don't know why that warranted an attack, but you do you.Christ you're dumb at this.
One was something she allegedly said, the other was a quote. Accordingly, I responded to them differently. I don't know why that warranted an attack, but you do you.Christ you're dumb at this.
Thank you for bringing up the idea of oaths and that you consider them to be important. Much like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump clearly does not take oaths seriously considering his record of infidelity. On the other hand by all available evidence Hillary Clinton does take her oaths seriously.
As someone who is looking for someone who shares your feelings about oaths I assume this means you have become a Clinton supporter. If my intuition is wrong I would love to hear your views on why!
So the Trump/GOP position is that Hillary is unsuitable to be President because she purportedly called other women who slept with her husband "really terrible names" while Donald Trump, who calls just about everyone he encounters really terrible names (except Putin and Trump's hot daughter) is uniquely qualified to be President?
Sometimes what passes for acceptable judgment skills/rational thinking boggles the mind.
You are absolutely correct, I don't know how this happened.Um he was re-elected in 1996. I don't believe the Lewinski scandal broke until after his election. So no they did not elect aftwards......
One was something she allegedly said, the other was a quote. Accordingly, I responded to them differently. I don't know why that warranted an attack, but you do you.
Just guessing, but maybe some of those other 17 candidates had a lot of skeletons (err, naked chicks) in the closet too.why didnt the gop pull this stuff up when it mattered?