• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

According to Donald troubled women are the best in bed

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Thank you for bringing up the idea of oaths and that you consider them to be important. Much like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump clearly does not take oaths seriously considering his record of infidelity. On the other hand by all available evidence Hillary Clinton does take her oaths seriously.

As someone who is looking for someone who shares your feelings about oaths I assume this means you have become a Clinton supporter. If my intuition is wrong I would love to hear your views on why!

Hillary took an oath to protect classified information and despite that was 'extremely careless' and apparently can't recall most of her tenure as secretary of state. She does however seem to love the banks with a great deal of fidelity and be fully committed to stoking a new cold war.

Also, I'm still not a trump supporter.
 
So the Trump/GOP position is that Hillary is unsuitable to be President because she purportedly called other women who slept with her husband "really terrible names" while Donald Trump, who calls just about everyone he encounters really terrible names (except Putin and Trump's hot daughter) is uniquely qualified to be President?

Sometimes what passes for acceptable judgment skills/rational thinking boggles the mind.

I don't know what the Trump/GOP position is. I don't care to either because I'm not going to vote that ticket.

Hillary is unsuitable for a huge number of reasons not the least of which being her repeated proximity to accused rapists. Bill's extracurriculars didn't disqualify him, yet unsubstantiated rumor is supposed to tank another candidate?
 
One was something she allegedly said, the other was a quote. Accordingly, I responded to them differently. I don't know why that warranted an attack, but you do you.

No, really try to think about how dumb this is: "Allegations are not evidence."

That quote is an allegation, as in something she alleges is true. Ponder this long and hard if you must insist it's not dumb as shit.
 
Someone with a moniker like Knowing typically shows up to be the exact opposite of course.

Is like a gamer calling them self UltraMegaUberGuy and getting their butt kicked on a regular basis.
 
Back
Top