About to buy an MP3 Player

[Gurck]

Originally posted by: torpid
If she's not technically literate at all, the iPod is a better choice. Not because it is easier to work with (software is slightly worse, interface on the mp3 player itself is better) but because there is a much larger community for support and I would trust apple any day over iriver for technical support based on my limited experience.

If she is technically literate, then it depends on whether she prefers an easy to use device that looks good with little extra features, or a feature-rich player which may be a little more "goofy".

On looks - am I the only one who thinnks the iPod is fugly? It looks like something you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using, glaring white plastic and gaudy neon lights... I much prefer the old-school look of many other players, far less obtrusive. But if she's the type to walk around in size 58 chartreuse pants with her "homies", the iPod may be perfect for her, in terms of looks..

 

[CtK]

i have the iRiver and its a better overall MP3 player
and i didnt want to carry around a white MP3 player
im not racist lol

 

[chinkee]

i love the iriver. i have the ihp-120 b/c my friends all had the ipod and i didn't want to buy into the hype. i read many reviews online and there was not one bad thing said about the iriver. to be honest, all the reviews for iriver have been better than the ones for ipod. i use it mainly as external storage, but the sound for mp3s is great. it also comes with voice recording, a remote control, protective cover, and FM radio. the only downside is the crappy headphones. do yourself a favor and upgrade to a better pair asap. although people may think that the ipod is smaller, they both weigh the same. i do think the ipod is smaller though, and it looks "cooler" . not that the iriver is ugly or anything...

 

[torpid]

Originally posted by: Gurck

Originally posted by: torpid
If she's not technically literate at all, the iPod is a better choice. Not because it is easier to work with (software is slightly worse, interface on the mp3 player itself is better) but because there is a much larger community for support and I would trust apple any day over iriver for technical support based on my limited experience.

If she is technically literate, then it depends on whether she prefers an easy to use device that looks good with little extra features, or a feature-rich player which may be a little more "goofy".

On looks - am I the only one who thinnks the iPod is fugly? It looks like something you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using, glaring white plastic and gaudy neon lights... I much prefer the old-school look of many other players, far less obtrusive. But if she's the type to walk around in size 58 chartreuse pants with her "homies", the iPod may be perfect for her, in terms of looks..

Hm, I prefer the look of the iPod. Most mp3 players look pretty good, though. I just think the iPod looks a little cleaner. I like the brushed steel look of the zen a lot too.

 

[CChaos]

Originally posted by: Gurck

Originally posted by: torpid
If she's not technically literate at all, the iPod is a better choice. Not because it is easier to work with (software is slightly worse, interface on the mp3 player itself is better) but because there is a much larger community for support and I would trust apple any day over iriver for technical support based on my limited experience.

If she is technically literate, then it depends on whether she prefers an easy to use device that looks good with little extra features, or a feature-rich player which may be a little more "goofy".

On looks - am I the only one who thinnks the iPod is fugly? It looks like something you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using, glaring white plastic and gaudy neon lights... I much prefer the old-school look of many other players, far less obtrusive. But if she's the type to walk around in size 58 chartreuse pants with her "homies", the iPod may be perfect for her, in terms of looks..

Man have you got a chip on your shoulder. "Glaring" and "gaudy"? Have you ever seen an iPod? I'm beginning to wonder. By the way, my iPod and headphones are black and I never use the backlight.

To the OP: I strongly considered the iRiver before getting an iPod, but I knew I'd never use alot of the features like the FM tuner. I like the simplicity of the iPod. As many people have pointed out, both are very capable so I'm sure either would be a great gift.

 

[cerebusPu]

you needto remember its a gift for your sister. whether you like it or not has no bearing on whether she likes it or not.

even though the iriver may be more capable, the ipod is more well liked by females all over the world.

 

[Gurck]

Originally posted by: CChaos

Originally posted by: Gurck

Originally posted by: torpid
If she's not technically literate at all, the iPod is a better choice. Not because it is easier to work with (software is slightly worse, interface on the mp3 player itself is better) but because there is a much larger community for support and I would trust apple any day over iriver for technical support based on my limited experience.

If she is technically literate, then it depends on whether she prefers an easy to use device that looks good with little extra features, or a feature-rich player which may be a little more "goofy".

On looks - am I the only one who thinnks the iPod is fugly? It looks like something you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using, glaring white plastic and gaudy neon lights... I much prefer the old-school look of many other players, far less obtrusive. But if she's the type to walk around in size 58 chartreuse pants with her "homies", the iPod may be perfect for her, in terms of looks..

Man have you got a chip on your shoulder. "Glaring" and "gaudy"? Have you ever seen an iPod? I'm beginning to wonder. By the way, my iPod and headphones are black and I never use the backlight.

To the OP: I strongly considered the iRiver before getting an iPod, but I knew I'd never use alot of the features like the FM tuner. I like the simplicity of the iPod. As many people have pointed out, both are very capable so I'm sure either would be a great gift.

No chip on my shoulder, and I've certainly seen them. Looks are subjective of course. Some people like 30" rims on a Civic as well.

 

[theNEOone]

Originally posted by: Gurck
On looks - am I the only one who thinnks the iPod is fugly? It looks like something you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using, glaring white plastic and gaudy neon lights... I much prefer the old-school look of many other players, far less obtrusive. But if she's the type to walk around in size 58 chartreuse pants with her "homies", the iPod may be perfect for her, in terms of looks..

yes, you are the only one.


=|

 

[vi edit]

iPod + ephPod = nice combo. I :heart: my ipod mini.

 

[ggavinmoss]

Originally posted by: werk
I still think the iAudio M3 is the way to go when looking for a new DAP.

Wow, that looks really nice. Have you played around with it?

-geoff

 

[CChaos]

Originally posted by: Gurck
No chip on my shoulder, and I've certainly seen them. Looks are subjective of course. Some people like 30" rims on a Civic as well.

Oh it's there alright. After all, there are several posts of yours bashing iPods in a thread about iRiver. You haven't made a single comment on the iRiver player! As far as the looks go, it's fairly obvious that the iHP was designed with the iPod in mind and they really don't look that different. Comparing the design on the iPod to 30" wheels on a Civic and saying it looks like something "you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using" as well as "glaring" and "gaudy" is about the most malformed opinion on design I've ever read. Bash the battery life and the sound quality all you want, but if you can't see that this is a simple, functional and elegant design then you're just exposing how prejudiced you are against iPods. As if that was in doubt...

 

[IBuyUFO]

I have the zen touch and I love it!

 

[torpid]

Originally posted by: CChaos

Originally posted by: Gurck
No chip on my shoulder, and I've certainly seen them. Looks are subjective of course. Some people like 30" rims on a Civic as well.

Oh it's there alright. After all, there are several posts of yours bashing iPods in a thread about iRiver. You haven't made a single comment on the iRiver player! As far as the looks go, it's fairly obvious that the iHP was designed with the iPod in mind and they really don't look that different. Comparing the design on the iPod to 30" wheels on a Civic and saying it looks like something "you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using" as well as "glaring" and "gaudy" is about the most malformed opinion on design I've ever read. Bash the battery life and the sound quality all you want, but if you can't see that this is a simple, functional and elegant design then you're just exposing how prejudiced you are against iPods. As if that was in doubt...

And anyway, looks like the 4G ipods have much improved battery life and sound quality, so soon even those rants may be unfounded.

 

[Tiamat]

If she isnt very technical minded, get her an Ipod Mini as its aesthetics will >> function in her mind.

i have the iRiver IGP 100 and am very happy with it. It seems to be the only small mp3 player that is "drag and drop" No Hassels. I think its not being sold anymore tho...

 

[Gurck]

Originally posted by: CChaos

Originally posted by: Gurck
No chip on my shoulder, and I've certainly seen them. Looks are subjective of course. Some people like 30" rims on a Civic as well.

Oh it's there alright. After all, there are several posts of yours bashing iPods in a thread about iRiver. You haven't made a single comment on the iRiver player! As far as the looks go, it's fairly obvious that the iHP was designed with the iPod in mind and they really don't look that different. Comparing the design on the iPod to 30" wheels on a Civic and saying it looks like something "you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using" as well as "glaring" and "gaudy" is about the most malformed opinion on design I've ever read. Bash the battery life and the sound quality all you want, but if you can't see that this is a simple, functional and elegant design then you're just exposing how prejudiced you are against iPods. As if that was in doubt...

Actually the chip seems to be on your shoulder, and in favor of the iPod. The only thing I've said which could be considered bashing it is when I commented on its looks - and I made sure to stipulate that it's merely opinion. My other comments which shed a bad light on it are statements of fact. When I say it has low sound quality, that's a fact, I'm not bashing it. When I say it has the lowest battery life of any DAP, same thing. When I say it doesn't support wma, ogg, or flac, same thing. When I say it forces you to use iTunes, same thing. Getting the idea yet?

[you have] the most malformed opinion on design I've ever read

Ah, ok. Your opinions are always right, I take it?

 

[loup garou]

Originally posted by: dc
no lcd on the player itlself =

but otherwise that's a very nice player.

Why? Having to take the player out of your pocket/bag to see what's going on is a pain in the ass. I can't wait for the day we have a HD based DAP with wireless headphones and a small wireless LCD remote. Throw the HD in your bag, clip the remote to your sleeve and put on the headphones...

Originally posted by: ggavinmoss

Originally posted by: werk
I still think the iAudio M3 is the way to go when looking for a new DAP.

Wow, that looks really nice. Have you played around with it?

-geoff

I wish...if my gf catches me looking at another gadget she'll kill me.

 

[theNEOone]

Originally posted by: Gurck

Originally posted by: CChaos

Originally posted by: Gurck
No chip on my shoulder, and I've certainly seen them. Looks are subjective of course. Some people like 30" rims on a Civic as well.

Oh it's there alright. After all, there are several posts of yours bashing iPods in a thread about iRiver. You haven't made a single comment on the iRiver player! As far as the looks go, it's fairly obvious that the iHP was designed with the iPod in mind and they really don't look that different. Comparing the design on the iPod to 30" wheels on a Civic and saying it looks like something "you'd see some wannabe thug ricer using" as well as "glaring" and "gaudy" is about the most malformed opinion on design I've ever read. Bash the battery life and the sound quality all you want, but if you can't see that this is a simple, functional and elegant design then you're just exposing how prejudiced you are against iPods. As if that was in doubt...

Actually the chip seems to be on your shoulder, and in favor of the iPod. The only thing I've said which could be considered bashing it is when I commented on its looks - and I made sure to stipulate that it's merely opinion. My other comments which shed a bad light on it are statements of fact. When I say it has low sound quality, that's a fact, I'm not bashing it. When I say it has the lowest battery life of any DAP, same thing. When I say it doesn't support wma, ogg, or flac, same thing. When I say it forces you to use iTunes, same thing. Getting the idea yet?

[you have] the most malformed opinion on design I've ever read

Ah, ok. Your opinions are always right, I take it?

the ipod still owns all.


=|