• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

about the captured soldiers and their human rights...

SherEPunjab

Diamond Member
The U.N. was pushing to save Iraq's butt from American wrath earlier, and now we have these punks executing our P.O.W.'s. If they were shot in the forehead as reports indicate, that means they were summarily executed.

Now, I think it is only fair for the U.N. to 'strongly, strongly urge (i.e. we will ALL kick your pathetic butts if you don't)' Iraq to not violate international human rights violations in the treatments of POW's.

On one hand, Iraq was accusing the U.S. of going against the wishes of the world (UN), that we are hypocrites, and tyrants, on the other hand they themselves are not heeding the standard practice of the treatment of POW's.

thoughts?
 
Originally posted by: SherEPunjab
The U.N. was pushing to save Iraq's butt from American wrath earlier, and now we have these punks executing our P.O.W.'s. If they were shot in the forehead as reports indicate, that means they were summarily executed.

Now, I think it is only fair for the U.N. to 'strongly, strongly urge (i.e. we will ALL kick your pathetic butts if you don't)' Iraq to not violate international human rights violations in the treatments of POW's.

On one hand, Iraq was accusing the U.S. of going against the wishes of the world (UN), that we are hypocrites, and tyrants, on the other hand they themselves are not heeding the standard practice of the treatment of POW's.

thoughts?

I think the Iraq would continue to thumb its nose at the UN.
 
Back
Top