Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: rgwalt
Originally posted by: NeoPTLD
Originally posted by: rgwalt
These fine people are correct, but a couple of clarifcations... Electrolysis is only about 50% efficient, meaning it takes twice as much energy to liberate a given amount of hydrogen than would be produced when that hydrogen is re-combined with oxygen to form water. That being said, you also have a reduction in efficiency in combustion. So, water will never be used as a on-vehicle fuel source until we have fusion reactors under our hoods.
Secondly, liquid hydrogen is only "cold" when at atmospheric pressure. You can store hydrogen as a liquid at room temperature, but it has to be at very high pressure. This poses a very dangerous problem, too.
Ryan
No you can not store liquid hydrogen at room temperature regardless of pressure. There is a factor called "critical temperature" and once you're above that temperature, you can not keep it liquefied regardless of pressure applied. The critical temperature of liquid H2 is way below room temp.
OK, you are right. The CT for hydrogen is around -400 F. However, you can store it as a supercritical fluid at room temperature and high enough pressure. At these pressures you can't classify the hydrogen as a liquid or a gas.
Ryan
Any idea what pressure is necessary?
One trivia fact. Liquid hydrogen is so cold that it can condense oxygen from air. If liquid oxygen drips onto asphalt it can start a fire.
Originally posted by: Insidious
Originally posted by: OIKOS
what are some disadvantages about fuel cells???
expense, non-optimized technology, no infrastructure to get the fuel to the vehicles, and the fact
that somewhere along the line people are going to realize that despite cleaning up our vehicles,
we will make one big friggin mess with the H2 production. (last I heard, electrical power plants
are also of the devil....)
and last, but not least..... powerful people who have interest in the fossil fuel industry :disgust: