• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Abortion: Just the Data

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: zendari
Why do the abortionists make a big deal about protecting a barbaric procedure like PBA? The so called "radical right" couldn't play ball with this issue without someone to play ball with.

The libs make a big deal about a few people in Abu Ghraib.
Click to expand...

Wow, your ignorace amazes me. How exactly do you connect voluntray abortions with involuntary abuse of people?
 
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: zendari
Why do the abortionists make a big deal about protecting a barbaric procedure like PBA? The so called "radical right" couldn't play ball with this issue without someone to play ball with.

The libs make a big deal about a few people in Abu Ghraib.
Click to expand...

Wow, your ignorace amazes me. How exactly do you connect voluntray abortions with involuntary abuse of people?
Click to expand...
When did the fetus volunteer to be aborted, especially in such a brutal way?

 
Originally posted by: zendari
I'd rather pay more for a child that could someday become a productive human being than a worthless whore who continually spreads her legs without consequence because the government is nicely paying for it.

The government should also encourage adoptions, more than they do so now. But PBA would be a dead issue by now if not for the liberal courts.

BTW, I'm sure you realize that the Guttmacher Institute is a subsidiary of Planned Parenthood?
Click to expand...

LoL - You do realize had that "worthless whore" been aborted she wouldn't be having all those kids.

 
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: zendari
I'd rather pay more for a child that could someday become a productive human being than a worthless whore who continually spreads her legs without consequence because the government is nicely paying for it.

The government should also encourage adoptions, more than they do so now. But PBA would be a dead issue by now if not for the liberal courts.

BTW, I'm sure you realize that the Guttmacher Institute is a subsidiary of Planned Parenthood?
Click to expand...

LoL - You do realize had that "worthless whore" been aborted she wouldn't be having all those kids.
Click to expand...

I do. So where is this magic test to determine who is going to be a worthless whore in 20 years?
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: zendari
I'd rather pay more for a child that could someday become a productive human being than a worthless whore who continually spreads her legs without consequence because the government is nicely paying for it.

The government should also encourage adoptions, more than they do so now. But PBA would be a dead issue by now if not for the liberal courts.

BTW, I'm sure you realize that the Guttmacher Institute is a subsidiary of Planned Parenthood?
Click to expand...

LoL - You do realize had that "worthless whore" been aborted she wouldn't be having all those kids.
Click to expand...

I do. So where is this magic test to determine who is going to be a worthless whore in 20 years?
Click to expand...

That's the problem isn't it ? Until we discover a magic test to show who will be of value I'd much rather not have the "worthless whore" having anymore kids either. So if she uses birth control, abortion, has her tubes tide, or wakes up and discovers common sense I think it's better off she not have any kids period.
 
Nice way of spinning what I just posted there. The only thing I support is giving people options for birth control so they don't produce more kids then they can take care of. Sorry Zendari but you cant force people to change their behavior in this country. No government or government policy on earth can change a basic human behavior. It's didn't work in communist nations and it wont work in your dream land. People are going to make mistakes and engage behaviors that you may not like. The only thing others can do about this is to inform people about the risks of said behavior and provide them options to lessen the risks /damage from said behaviors.
 
Missing in the article is the fact that 10 or more states no longer report their abortion stats, one of which is CA.

Also, 80% of women that have abortions report being pressured to have the procedure by boyfriends, family and or clergy.

Finally, juvenile crime is down nationally perhaps due to the fact that there are significantly fewer children to commit the crimes.

Oh yea, forgot that story last year that indicated that 65% of all abortions would have most likely been DEMOCRATS.

 
Originally posted by: Gravity

Finally, juvenile crime is down nationally perhaps due to the fact that there are significantly fewer children to commit the crimes.
Click to expand...

Less children? Do you mean per capita, because the actual number of children in the US is higher today than it has been in the past.

Actually, a study I saw not to long ago, showed that statistically, the only social or economic stat that showed high correlation with the current riduction in crime was the increase in abortion after it was legalized.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top