My buddy has the following system:
Enlight 7237
Abit BH6 rev 1.0? (not sure which exact one) running the SS BIOS
some old 5400rpm 4 gig HD (pri)
Maxtor 7200rpm 40g HD (sla)
HP 8200 CDRW
Geforce2 MX 400 64MB *PCI*
Creative labs PCI
Trendnet PCI (ethernet)
Kingston ValueRAM 256MB PC133
.. all running Win2k.
The processor WAS a good ol' slot1 C300A running at 450@2.2V. Games that he plays are generally UT and MOHAA. UT gets around 50-60FPS at 16bit and 640x480 with eye candy turned off. Put in a Cel 566 (66x9.5) with an MSI 6905 slocket and it ran fine at 1.5V. Clocked it up to 850 (100x8.5) - 1.5 wouldn't get into windows - 1.55 wouldn't load up MOHAA and crashed UT - 1.65 seems to be running things pretty smoothly..
W2k loads up much faster.. it seems like UT is getting about the same framerates (hitting around the 50-60fps range).. it's on the 5400rpm drive, and I plan on installing it onto the 7200rpm drive instead, but that should only help load times I'm expecting.. MOHAA seems to run slightly better, but not noticeably (it's on the lowest settings as well). My question is should I be expecting a big difference in performance for these games? I know the PCI Geforce2 is a big obstacle here, but how much difference should this CPU upgrade make? He also plans on playing Ghost Recon, Jedi Outcast, Spiderman and Morrowind.
Also, the motherboard can only find 128Megs of the RAM for some reason. Before and after both BIOS flash and CPU upgrade.. can't test this as I don't have another system, but wondering if there's any way to tell if it's the MB or the memory..
Also, a bonus side question: with UT, I upped the res from 640x480 to 1024x768 at 16bit with both his computer and my Toshiba Satellite (P3 900Mhz with Geforce2Go 16MB) with almost NO drop in framerates.. does the Geforce2 chipset have some kind of scaling? It's been great!
thanks for any help..
indd
Enlight 7237
Abit BH6 rev 1.0? (not sure which exact one) running the SS BIOS
some old 5400rpm 4 gig HD (pri)
Maxtor 7200rpm 40g HD (sla)
HP 8200 CDRW
Geforce2 MX 400 64MB *PCI*
Creative labs PCI
Trendnet PCI (ethernet)
Kingston ValueRAM 256MB PC133
.. all running Win2k.
The processor WAS a good ol' slot1 C300A running at 450@2.2V. Games that he plays are generally UT and MOHAA. UT gets around 50-60FPS at 16bit and 640x480 with eye candy turned off. Put in a Cel 566 (66x9.5) with an MSI 6905 slocket and it ran fine at 1.5V. Clocked it up to 850 (100x8.5) - 1.5 wouldn't get into windows - 1.55 wouldn't load up MOHAA and crashed UT - 1.65 seems to be running things pretty smoothly..
W2k loads up much faster.. it seems like UT is getting about the same framerates (hitting around the 50-60fps range).. it's on the 5400rpm drive, and I plan on installing it onto the 7200rpm drive instead, but that should only help load times I'm expecting.. MOHAA seems to run slightly better, but not noticeably (it's on the lowest settings as well). My question is should I be expecting a big difference in performance for these games? I know the PCI Geforce2 is a big obstacle here, but how much difference should this CPU upgrade make? He also plans on playing Ghost Recon, Jedi Outcast, Spiderman and Morrowind.
Also, the motherboard can only find 128Megs of the RAM for some reason. Before and after both BIOS flash and CPU upgrade.. can't test this as I don't have another system, but wondering if there's any way to tell if it's the MB or the memory..
Also, a bonus side question: with UT, I upped the res from 640x480 to 1024x768 at 16bit with both his computer and my Toshiba Satellite (P3 900Mhz with Geforce2Go 16MB) with almost NO drop in framerates.. does the Geforce2 chipset have some kind of scaling? It's been great!
thanks for any help..
indd