- Nov 6, 2005
- 20,984
- 3
- 0
In breaking news and as promised, the Palestinian authority delegation headed by Abbas, delivered their negotiating position to Israel and Netanyuhu today. With a somewhat a promise by Netanyuhu to respond in two weeks and not the month requested.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diploma...ers-peace-talks-demands-to-netanyahu-1.424905
However, and what the link refers to as a Palestinian embarrassment, missing in action was a major Palestinian power broker in PM Salem Fayyad. As Fayyad withdrew, because he evidently felt going to the UN was not a wise course for the Palestinians. But IMHO, it is the wise course, and in a longer history, it makes Fayyad odd man out. And Abbas had pushed Fayyad to be the head of any Palestinian reunification government between Fatah and Hamas. However, Fayyad drew the universal opposition of almost everyone on the Hamas side and thus played a large role in scuttling free Palestinian elections that may have voted Hamas out of power.
In terms of the Palestinian terms, and the reason for today's meeting with Netanyuhu is basically unchanged from the initial Obama position in 9/2010, and that is to cause a real Israeli settlement freeze on disputed territories in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. And to take the entire settlement freeze issue to the UN, and even if it fails in the Security Council, it can be very embarrassing to Israel and the USA in the general assembly. And even if most new UN Statehood applications fail in the first year, my guess is that each and every year from now on, the same Palestinian Statehood application will be before the UN. But the one thing we can ask, will world pressure build against the USA to the point that its unconditional support of Israel starts to really hurt US foreign policy results.
http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/diplom...tinian-peace-plan-or-we-return-to-un-1.423290
As the other thing we more or less know from experience, is that Israel Palestinian negotiations never lead anywhere without a settlement freeze.
But when the Obama lead initiative ended in 10/2011, the Palestinian side kept being pressured to return to the table without a settlement freeze. And now when the Jordanian led efforts expired without any Israeli concessions in late March/2012, today, Abbas and the PA have crossed the Rubicon and have played their trump card.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diploma...ers-peace-talks-demands-to-netanyahu-1.424905
However, and what the link refers to as a Palestinian embarrassment, missing in action was a major Palestinian power broker in PM Salem Fayyad. As Fayyad withdrew, because he evidently felt going to the UN was not a wise course for the Palestinians. But IMHO, it is the wise course, and in a longer history, it makes Fayyad odd man out. And Abbas had pushed Fayyad to be the head of any Palestinian reunification government between Fatah and Hamas. However, Fayyad drew the universal opposition of almost everyone on the Hamas side and thus played a large role in scuttling free Palestinian elections that may have voted Hamas out of power.
In terms of the Palestinian terms, and the reason for today's meeting with Netanyuhu is basically unchanged from the initial Obama position in 9/2010, and that is to cause a real Israeli settlement freeze on disputed territories in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. And to take the entire settlement freeze issue to the UN, and even if it fails in the Security Council, it can be very embarrassing to Israel and the USA in the general assembly. And even if most new UN Statehood applications fail in the first year, my guess is that each and every year from now on, the same Palestinian Statehood application will be before the UN. But the one thing we can ask, will world pressure build against the USA to the point that its unconditional support of Israel starts to really hurt US foreign policy results.
http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/diplom...tinian-peace-plan-or-we-return-to-un-1.423290
As the other thing we more or less know from experience, is that Israel Palestinian negotiations never lead anywhere without a settlement freeze.
But when the Obama lead initiative ended in 10/2011, the Palestinian side kept being pressured to return to the table without a settlement freeze. And now when the Jordanian led efforts expired without any Israeli concessions in late March/2012, today, Abbas and the PA have crossed the Rubicon and have played their trump card.
Last edited: