• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Aaahahaa...Microsoft uses Linux to protect their servers!!!

DaFinn

Diamond Member
Microsoft is using Akamai to route the traffic to their servers, and Akamai uses Linux...

More at Netcraft

Go Micr...eh Linux! :beer:😀


(sorry if a repost...)
 
Text for those who are too lazy to click the link...
---


On Friday Microsoft changed its DNS so that requests for www.microsoft.com no longer resolve to machines on Microsoft?s own network, but instead are handled by the Akamai caching system, which runs Linux.
Akamai provides an internet-wide caching system, which can act as a symmetric defence to distributed denial of service attacks. Just as a denial of service attack funnels traffic from many different points to a single destination, Akamai's DNS servers multiplex requests for a specific hostname to the nearest point to each attacking machine in its global caching system, diminishing the effect of the attack by dividing the inbound requests amongst its many servers, and limiting the amount of DDoS traffic by localising the distance between attacker and target. Akamai presents a more challenging target for a DDoS than any single network, and would seem to be the best practical step where a distributed denial of service is directed at a hostname that the target organisation cannot reasonably take offline.

Microsoft was able to defend against an earlier DDoS aimed at windowsupdate.com by taking that hostname out of the DNS, as windowsupdate.com was less important to its operations than the attackers expected.

Many web forums, including those at Anandtech and Slashdot are discussing the irony of the www.microsoft.com site apparently running Linux. Additionally, we are seeing a quantity of mail asking why we are reporting www.microsoft.com running the ?impossible? combination of the Linux operating system and Microsoft-IIS/6.0 web server.

When we request www.microsoft.com the DNS directs us to a server operated by Akamai. If you repeat this test, note that the actual Akamai server you connect to will differ according to your location on the internet and may vary from request to request. Akamai?s http caching servers run Linux, and so we report Linux as the operating system. However Akamai also forwards the http Server: header from the original server as part of the cached content, and so we report ?Microsoft-IIS/6.0? as the web server.

$ telnet www.microsoft.com http
Trying 213.161.82.44...
Connected to a562.cd.akamai.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
Host: www.microsoft.com

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
P3P: CP='ALL IND DSP COR ADM CONo CUR CUSo IVAo IVDo PSA
PSD TAI TELo OUR SAMo CNT COM INT NAV ONL PHY PRE PUR UNI'
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Content-Length: 45238
Content-Type: text/html
Expires: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 15:35:25 GMT
Cache-Control: max-age=0, no-cache, no-store
Pragma: no-cache
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 15:35:25 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
 
If the article says it's already being discussed at Anandtech....
Not that I've seen it. Maybe in the OS Forum it's been posted....
 
Originally posted by: Jzero
If the article says it's already being discussed at Anandtech....
Not that I've seen it. Maybe in the OS Forum it's been posted....

Hah, didn't see the part where it said that it's being discussed in AT. Search got me nothing but...
 
Originally posted by: m2kewl
Originally posted by: deerslayer
Why am I not suprised?

you and everybody else. when was the last time M$ had a secure OS in the last 10 years? 😀😛


All of windows after win98 were secure, you ever be a *nix admin? Everyday there are new exploits out that you have to patch.
 
Originally posted by: Riba
Originally posted by: m2kewl
Originally posted by: deerslayer
Why am I not suprised?

you and everybody else. when was the last time M$ had a secure OS in the last 10 years? 😀😛


All of windows after win98 were secure, you ever be a *nix admin? Everyday there are new exploits out that you have to patch.

All after win98... rright, I'll drink to that :beer:😀
 
Back
Top