Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Both sides think it is biased(against them).
Originally posted by: XZeroII
You've got to be kidding if you think that this board is anywhere near balanced. Look at that poll for who people voted for. It was more than 2 to 1 in favor of Kerry (at least last time I looked at it). Also, look on the front page. For every one post about is good about Bush, there are at least 2 that are against Bush. This board is very liberal.
Originally posted by: XZeroII
You've got to be kidding if you think that this board is anywhere near balanced. Look at that poll for who people voted for. It was more than 2 to 1 in favor of Kerry (at least last time I looked at it). Also, look on the front page. For every one post about is good about Bush, there are at least 2 that are against Bush. This board is very liberal.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: XZeroII
You've got to be kidding if you think that this board is anywhere near balanced. Look at that poll for who people voted for. It was more than 2 to 1 in favor of Kerry (at least last time I looked at it). Also, look on the front page. For every one post about is good about Bush, there are at least 2 that are against Bush. This board is very liberal.
Yep, this board is frequented by a lot of folks that are in the know of the behind the scenes that makes computers work. The rest just know to turn it on a click.
Which ones can think for themselves and not Religiously Brainwashed is easy to tell.
Sadlyl, anti-Bush =! pro-KerryOriginally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: XZeroII
You've got to be kidding if you think that this board is anywhere near balanced. Look at that poll for who people voted for. It was more than 2 to 1 in favor of Kerry (at least last time I looked at it). Also, look on the front page. For every one post about is good about Bush, there are at least 2 that are against Bush. This board is very liberal.
Anti-Bush != liberal
Anti-Bush != liberal
Anti-Bush != liberal
Anti-Bush != liberal
Anti-Bush != liberal
Anti-Bush != liberal
Anti-Bush != liberal
Anti-Bush != liberal
- .
.
.
Originally posted by: Condor
So, do you know how a phanastron oscillator works? Have you ever seen a drum storage unit? Knowing computers isn't simply knowing what to click next or how to script VB or how to break the mirror on a RAID system. Can you repair a multi level board? Determine logical vs physical CCHH? You did open this by framing yourself as a behind the scenes kind of computer guy.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Condor
So, do you know how a phanastron oscillator works? Have you ever seen a drum storage unit? Knowing computers isn't simply knowing what to click next or how to script VB or how to break the mirror on a RAID system. Can you repair a multi level board? Determine logical vs physical CCHH? You did open this by framing yourself as a behind the scenes kind of computer guy.
Absolutely on every one of the above. You obviously have no idea who I am.
I don't recognize the phanastron variation of an oscillator probably because it is older than the 555 chip but I have worked with a ton of variations of Oscillators across many different designs from UHF/Microwave Transmitters and Recievers to Dial Up Modems to DSL Modems.
I am just old enough to have run across the old IBM Mainframe drives but young enough to fortunately not had to work with them. My work experience started right at the time of the Personal PC stating with a Timex Sinclair 1000 Kit I put together on the workbench in summer 1982.
I have designed 5 & 6 layer boards. Again with the old Mainframe storage. OK so you're obviously an old timer. So??? What's your point??? Can you do more with a PC other than turn it on and click???
I voted for Kerry and I know how to turn on my computer and that's about it. It's a tool for me to get information so I'm decent w/software but when it comes to the inner workings of what's inside the box, I'm totally clueless.Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: XZeroII
You've got to be kidding if you think that this board is anywhere near balanced. Look at that poll for who people voted for. It was more than 2 to 1 in favor of Kerry (at least last time I looked at it). Also, look on the front page. For every one post about is good about Bush, there are at least 2 that are against Bush. This board is very liberal.
Yep, this board is frequented by a lot of folks that are in the know of the behind the scenes that makes computers work. The rest just know to turn it on a click.
Which ones can think for themselves and not Religiously Brainwashed is easy to tell.
So, do you know how a phanastron oscillator works? Have you ever seen a drum storage unit? Knowing computers isn't simply knowing what to click next or how to script VB or how to break the mirror on a RAID system. Can you repair a multi level board? Determine logical vs physical CCHH? You did open this by framing yourself as a behind the scenes kind of computer guy.
Can we make our forum slogan: AT P&N - the perineum of America :thumbsup:Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Balanced between sh!t and shinola is still someplace I don't want to be.
The middle ground isn't supposed to be right--it's supposed to provide the outcome that produces the most utility among its constituentsOriginally posted by: ElFenix
nope
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
The middle ground isn't supposed to be right--it's supposed to provide the outcome that produces the most utility among its constituentsOriginally posted by: ElFenix
nope
Ok, so If half the population is arsenic, should we just bar them from voting?Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Sort of like arsenic and water.Originally posted by: b0mbrman
The middle ground isn't supposed to be right--it's supposed to provide the outcome that produces the most utility among its constituentsOriginally posted by: ElFenix
nope
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Ok, so If half the population is arsenic, should we just bar them from voting?Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Sort of like arsenic and water.Originally posted by: b0mbrman
The middle ground isn't supposed to be right--it's supposed to provide the outcome that produces the most utility among its constituentsOriginally posted by: ElFenix
nope