A scathing report on Ethical conducts of the Bush Administration by the conservative Judical Watch.

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
They're on Bush's ass for not going after Clinton. So what? We have more important business to attend to: war, economy, budget, campaign finance, etc. History will record what a POS Clinton was. Impeachment, disbarment and public humiliation are punishment enough. The goverment needs to get on with running the country in the here and now and forget about starting an investigation every time someone mentions Clintons name.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Why is it that I suspect that had the Bush administration gone after Clinton for these ethics violations you would be on this forum screaming about the Republican obsession with getting Bill Clinton?
 

Ferocious

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2000
4,584
2
71
It's business as usual when it comes to politics.

But that's normal.

Every administration has had it's scandals and controversies. (Though I'm having trouble at the moment remembering any from Carter's administration).

The difference with Clinton was.......his administration was the first during the internet age.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0


<< Why is it that I suspect that had the Bush administration gone after Clinton for these ethics violations you would be on this forum screaming about the Republican obsession with getting Bill Clinton? >>


Who are you talking to?
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91


<< Who are you talking to? >>


The original post. I actually think yours was right on target.
 

wQuay

Senior member
Nov 19, 2000
712
0
0


<< History will record what a POS Clinton was. >>



That only matters to those who care more about Clinton's popularity than the welfare of the nation itself. Also, the point is that Clinton's sh!t is persisting in the new administration.



<< We have more important business to attend to: war, economy, budget, campaign finance >>



All of which require a great deal of integrity. Which is kinda hard to have without respecting justice and the law.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
wQuay- I f you have read any of my posts you know that I absolutely despise the Clintons. Nothing would make me happier than seeing them both in jail. I was just saying that this kind of crap should not distract us from more important business, that's all. I am really not blind to anything, I'm just prioritizing differently than you.:)
 

Infos

Diamond Member
Jul 20, 2001
4,001
1
0
Judicial watch is almost as bad a joke
as the morons and immature punks that propagate this establishment
ie DaveSohmer

Their IQ is exceeded only by their immaturity
:disgust:
I really think an IQ test should be a requirement here
...but of course that would eliminate about 99% of the members


Since you find this "Establishment" such a bad joke maybe you won't mind posting elsewhere.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81


<< Why is it that I suspect that had the Bush administration gone after Clinton for these ethics violations you would be on this forum screaming about the Republican obsession with getting Bill Clinton? >>


LOL! :D Good point
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
<<Their IQ is exceeded only by their immaturity>>

So are you saying they have a high IQ or a low level of immaturity? :confused:
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Haha, some people are just obsessed with Clinton for some reason.
It's really becoming absurd. He hasn't been president for a year now, and yet right wingers are still furious.
 

MaxDSP

Lifer
May 15, 2001
10,056
0
71


<< Judicial watch is almost as bad a joke
as the morons and immature punks that propagate this establishment
ie DaveSohmer

Their IQ is exceeded only by their immaturity
:disgust:
I really think an IQ test should be a requirement here
...but of course that would eliminate about 99% of the members


Since you find this "Establishment" such a bad joke maybe you won't mind posting elsewhere.
>>




whoa, Infos is banned?
No
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0


<< as the morons and immature punks that propagate this establishment ie DaveSohmer >>


At 37 and with a tested IQ in the 140 range I am usually not classified as either "punkish" or moronic, but if you have something specific please speak up. I thought I made myself pretty clear in regards to this article, "nothing to see here, move along".