alcoholbob
Diamond Member
- May 24, 2005
- 6,271
- 323
- 126
Maybe Moonbeam is a neurosurgeon in the Deep South? 90% of his posts on P&N are about conservative brain defects.
We need 400k jobs/month to actually recover. 200k jobs/month is simply the replacement rate. And there are alot of pent up displaced workers. Underemployment never even used to be a thing.
90,000 jobs need to be created a month in order to keep up with population growth. ~257,000 a month is a pretty good number.
Well, first we should probably agree to a set benchmark, otherwise we'll just be crosstalking the whole time.The number is skewed because of how many are dropping out of the labor force THEN you look at population growth.
http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/how-many-jobs-are-needed-keep-population-growth
Luckily I was already looking at it in another tab, that says 126,000 or so using 68% participation, like before.
This is probably the most important dataset:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/NILFWJN
What are you talking about? Boehner said "Its always good news that more Americans are finding work," and added "That said, we know millions are still struggling and searching for a good job." Others clearly said that it was good news but there's still more work to do to improve. This is a brain defect in your world?
Please tell me more about who actually has a brain defect here.
Why is it click bait or dumb? I read the article, and while I didn't verify all the information presented, it didn't seem deceptive on the surface. Could you please address the actual information presented and explain why it's flawed, I'd like to know.
There are a lot of ways to look at this...but I see that you're convinced and are unable to see what I see. The LBD is strong with you it seems.Of course it's a brain defect. First it's Obama is terrible, the job market is a disaster, and then when the evidence to the contrary becomes undeniable, it becomes, this is good news BUT..... We never have plane old good news about the economy under a Democratic President, we always have bad news or better, when the evidence is overwhelming but lets keep the attention on the negative. Conservatives have a brain defect. They deny reality.
Now remember, there is no such thing as perfection. The best news could always be better. So let's not play that silly game. Republicans have done nothing but try to stop Obama from fixing the economy. They would destroy the country before they let his succeed and have done the best along that line that they can. When your team is more important than the nation, you have a brain defect. That conservatives have this problem more than liberals is a scientifically verified fact. Those scientists that know this are desperately seeking a way to keep conservatives from destroying the nation. You should try to help. And don't forget also, that no matter how badly defective you are, it could always be worse.
There are a lot of ways to look at this...but I see that you're convinced and are unable to see what I see. The LBD is strong with you it seems.
Let's take a look at the past couple of "recoveries" as compared to the other recoveries where big ol' gub'mint increased spending to get people working again.
Neoliberalism. Not even once.
Take a look at private job creation and public job creation since 2009.Prolonged recessions after Reaganomics went into effect, not surprised, since it's all about spending cuts and financial bubbles.
They flat out said it was good news...wtf moonie?Yes, there are many ways to look at it, when you have ulterior needs, but the essential fact is that the report is good news. Republicans can't any longer deny it, but they won't flat out admit it either. I see exactly what you see and I also see it's a deflection. Remember which of us the scientists say is likely to do that.
They flat out said it was good news...wtf moonie?
Of course they qualified because it's true...we still need improvement. Or are you so LBD that you actually think it's not true and that we don't still need further improvement?They qualified everything. Good news but but but isn't flat out.
They still have another year of hoping and praying that it goes bad so they even have a chance at the WH. Because Freedom.It really hurts you right wingers so much that the American economy is on the mend that you have to go through the five stages of grief?
Of course they qualified because it's true...we still need improvement. Or are you so LBD that you actually think it's not true and that we don't still need further improvement?
It really hurts you right wingers so much that the American economy is on the mend that you have to go through the five stages of grief?
They said the jobs reports was great; but the mere mention by some that further improvement is still needed gets your panties in a bunch. Even though it's fucking true! You're insane.What did I say before. There is nothing that can't be improved on, ever. Every post you've ever made could be improved on. Imagine if I told you that every time you posted. You would quickly conclude that I am insane and I would be. The reasons those folk gave in the link I gave are all there to detract and reduce the impact of the fact the figures were very good news. It's the nature of the but but but you are in denial about. You hide behind the trivial fact that the news could be better. Any good news can be better. But when you have a bunch of donkeys pointing that out you look for the motivation. "We came here to bury Caesar not to salute him."
Furthermore, you are defending the fucks that have done everything in their power to destroy the economy so Obama can get no credit for what little the Democrats could pass to make it better. You are on the side of folk who are against working people. How did you become so blind? If I weren't aware of the hopelessness of the CBD I could even get pissed off.
It really hurts you right wingers so much that the American economy is on the mend that you have to go through the five stages of grief?
They still have another year of hoping and praying that it goes bad so they even have a chance at the WH. Because Freedom.
It goes without saying that things can be better, but the GOP has to say it anyway. They are implying that things would be better now if it weren't for Obama and the Democrats.They said the jobs reports was great; but the mere mention by some that further improvement is still needed gets your panties in a bunch. Even though it's fucking true! You're insane.
What specific economic policies of the Democrats do you feel are stupid?Why would it when it was the repudiation of Obama's economic policy and loss of the Congressional (D) majority in last 3 elections that's responsible for it?
You might want to reconsider that. When times are good is exactly when people tend to vote Republican because economic issues like taxes and social policy can become more of a focus. Poor economic times are ideal for Democrats to get elected to WH since that's when people are most afraid and willing to try their stupid economic ideas again until they wise up at the next election cycle.
What specific economic policies of the Democrats do you feel are stupid?