woolfe9999
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2005
- 7,153
- 0
- 0
Ummm. You guys were already talking about it. I just wondered what you meant when you said cap gains weren't included.
If you want to, sure.
IIRC, the IRS has that data available. Its' taken from actual tax returns.
Ummm.. yeah, pretty much, but it's a little more complicated than that. Since we don't have a flat tax (one single rate) the progressive rates are going to skew that. Then there's the lower LT cap gain & div rates that counter that. Etc.
Not sure what position of the 'right' you're referring to.
Fern
The notion that the wealthy pay their "fair share" or more than their "fair share." Besides the fact that both sides have to admit that "fair share" is obviously subjective, the statistic that is often circulated to prove that the right pays at or more than its fair share - percentage of total tax paid - actually cuts both ways because a higher percentage of the total paid by the wealthy means the wealthy are grabbing a higher percentage of the total income. Someone on the left might argue that this means the wealthy should actually be taxed at a higher rate, which is opposite of the point of view that the statistic is offered to promote.
In any event, the statistic is highly dubious as proof of any point about "fair share" that the OP is trying to make for the reasons I've discussed - that it doesn't take into account how income distribution affects it, and it measures only a limited subject of taxation, specifically excluding regressive taxes like payroll and sales tax.
