• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A question about the Athlons!

SSP

Lifer
Ok, someone asked this question on another forum..

I looked the cache info from WCPUID, and I noticed that it said "Off" under some boxes. Here's a copy of the Cache info:

<< Cache Info. >>

[L1 Instruction TLB]
2-Mbyte/4-Mbyte Pages, fully associative, 8 entries
4-Kbyte Pages, fully associative, 16 entries

[L1 Data TLB]
2-Mbyte/4-Mbyte Pages, 4-way set associative, 8 entries
4-Kbyte Pages, fully associative, 24 entries

[L1 Instruction cache]
64K byte cache size, 2-way set associative, 64 byte line size, 1 line par tag

[L1 Data cache]
64K byte cache size, 2-way set associative, 64 byte line size, 1 line par tag

[L2 Unified cache]
512K byte cache size, 2-way set associative, 64 byte line size, 1 line par tag

[L2 Instruction/Unified TLB]
2-Mbyte/4-Mbyte Pages, Off, 0 entries
4-Kbyte Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries

[L2 Data TLB]
2-Mbyte/4-Mbyte Pages, Off, 0 entries
4-Kbyte Pages, 4-way set associative, 256 entries


Anyway, the person who originally posted this question thinks that his L2 cache is off. Anyone know what this is about?

BTW, I noticed on AMD CpuID that there's nothing like &quot;L2 Instruction&quot; and &quot;L2 Data&quot; (it's there for L1, but not for L2).

Here's a screen shot of AMD CpuID.

Thanks for your time. 🙂
 
Athlon's L2 is unified
not split

therefore

[L2 Unified cache]
512K byte cache size, 2-way set associative, 64 byte line size, 1 line par tag

that is all you need to see



 
Unless he has L2 cache disabled in the BIOS, it's enabled. Get someone else with an identical processor to run the same program and see what appears there.

I can't think of any reason really, I apologize. I don't have a K7 processor, and sadly don't have a whole load of knowledge of it. Is it possible that the K7 treats cache differently and there's some thing to do with &quot;L3&quot; cache?

Sorry if I'm completely off here, but I don't really have a clue what I'm talking about. 🙁

Cretin
 
Back
Top