T
Tim
If an officer of the law pulls you over for something minor, and ask if he/she may search your vehicle, do you have a right to refuse? If you do refuse, what then?
You refusing makes him/her suspicious, and there's your "probable cause". Case closed. It doesn't matter what's supposed to happen or what the laws are.
You refusing makes him/her suspicious, and there's your "probable cause". Case closed. It doesn't matter what's supposed to happen or what the laws are.
You refusing makes him/her suspicious, and there's your "probable cause". Case closed. It doesn't matter what's supposed to happen or what the laws are.
Like I said, it has nothing to do with courts, laws or anything at all. It's up to the officer whether he wants to or not. If he wants to, he will find a way.
There's no sense in babbling on about laws, statutes, fairness, justice and the American way. If they want to do it, they will, and it will be justified.
Don't you people live in the real world?
Yup, cops can say pretty much anything and it will be your word against theirs. For example, he could say, I'm going to have to search your car because your eyes look bloodshot or, your car looks/sounds like it has illegal aftermarket modifications.Like I said, it has nothing to do with courts, laws or anything at all. It's up to the officer whether he wants to or not. If he wants to, he will find a way.
There's no sense in babbling on about laws, statutes, fairness, justice and the American way. If they want to do it, they will, and it will be justified.
Don't you people live in the real world?
You don't get it, IT DOESN'T MATTER.
You might assume I'm a cop hater. It's actually the other way around. I have a few cop friends and it's almost ridiculous the stuff they will talk about with each other.
It's not major stuff, but just things that they shouldn't do, but do anyway because they know there's no way they will get in trouble for it. They stand up for each other, sometimes it's a good thing, sometimes not.
Actually, I think you're the one that doesn't get it. Our message is that you have rights if you choose assert them. Even if they "don't work in the real world," they are still your god given rights. Honestly, I'd rather fight an uphill battle than not fight at all.
Your message seems to be you don't have any rights, so why bother trying to assert them? Is that accurate?
You can try all you want. There's no reason to argue about it, things just don't work that way.