- Jan 23, 2003
- 517
- 0
- 0
I dunno.. I'm getting to the point where I would even turn down FAR stuff. I recently ran across a MIR for something that was like 5 bucks, 2 in rebate. That was a kick. And another instance where E-Cost had some bitchy terms that basically said 'We don't have to pay you'.
I wonder how something that is supposed to be a contract like that can be reduced to a 'we'll pay you if we feel like it'. People don't go to the store to buy something, give money, and hope 'the store gives it if they feel like it'. In-house rebates REALLY tick me off... why don't they just give you the discount at the time of purchase? I don't exactly feel like playing russian roulette with my money.
I think I got my fill of $20 hard drives and supposedly 'free' crap. Still waiting on a Hyundai $100 for my monitor..., and esp this last bit, take it however you will...
</soapbox
ff>
I wonder how something that is supposed to be a contract like that can be reduced to a 'we'll pay you if we feel like it'. People don't go to the store to buy something, give money, and hope 'the store gives it if they feel like it'. In-house rebates REALLY tick me off... why don't they just give you the discount at the time of purchase? I don't exactly feel like playing russian roulette with my money.
I think I got my fill of $20 hard drives and supposedly 'free' crap. Still waiting on a Hyundai $100 for my monitor..., and esp this last bit, take it however you will...
I don't know about anyone else, but a fifth of a year to send money that is supposed to be mine... that's ridiculous. Think we're going to see a massive consumer backlash sometime soon? Or is this practice here to stay?Hello XXXXXX XXXXXX,
We are happy to inform you that your submission for a $100 XXXX XXX rebate has been received and is currently being processed. Please allow 10 weeks from the postmark date of your submission for processing your rebate.
...
</soapbox
