- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/22/business/22charts.html
This week the cost of the metals in a penny rose above 0.8 cents, more than twice the value of last fall. Because the government spends at least another six-tenths of a cent ? above and beyond the cost of the metal ? to make each penny, it will lose nearly half a cent on each new one it mints.
The real problem could come if metals prices rise so high that it would be economical to melt down pennies for the metals they contain.
Pennies, meanwhile, are in high demand. Last year, the mint made 7.7 billion of them ? more than the number of all the other coins it produced. In the first three months of this year, the pace of penny production rose to an annual rate of 9 billion ? the highest since 2001.
How about some common cents? Eliminate the penny and resize the Nickel downward to about the current size of the penny. That would save the metal costs on the nickel and keep it viable for a far longer period of time.
And replace Ike with Lincoln on the nickel (optional)
This week the cost of the metals in a penny rose above 0.8 cents, more than twice the value of last fall. Because the government spends at least another six-tenths of a cent ? above and beyond the cost of the metal ? to make each penny, it will lose nearly half a cent on each new one it mints.
The real problem could come if metals prices rise so high that it would be economical to melt down pennies for the metals they contain.
Pennies, meanwhile, are in high demand. Last year, the mint made 7.7 billion of them ? more than the number of all the other coins it produced. In the first three months of this year, the pace of penny production rose to an annual rate of 9 billion ? the highest since 2001.
How about some common cents? Eliminate the penny and resize the Nickel downward to about the current size of the penny. That would save the metal costs on the nickel and keep it viable for a far longer period of time.
And replace Ike with Lincoln on the nickel (optional)