• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question A new CPU paradigm from Efficient.Computer



Even if it is successful, it's gonna be 5 years or more before we see this in consumer devices. Developing software for it from scratch is gonna be no simple task. Unless people suddenly start using Linux.
 


Even if it is successful, it's gonna be 5 years or more before we see this in consumer devices. Developing software for it from scratch is gonna be no simple task. Unless people suddenly start using Linux.

That s just outrageous claims to have money from the unsuspicious crowds flowing in their pockets, more likely a scam than anything else.
 
Sounds eerily similar to both the approach and claims that Tachyum made with their original Prodigy CPU before their roadmap blew up in their faces and they had to completely redesign the CPU from the ground up, dramatically change their claims, and push the release date years out (with still no silicon to speak of to date).
 


Even if it is successful, it's gonna be 5 years or more before we see this in consumer devices. Developing software for it from scratch is gonna be no simple task. Unless people suddenly start using Linux.
Something something dataflow architecture.

Sounds like the EDGE ISA that MS Research was pursuing for a while under the E2 name back in the 2010s, sadly that went nowhere and I don't think any dataflow architecture has ever managed to break in since.
 
This blurb makes me dubious.

eff_cpu_01.jpg

Call me crazy, but aren't FPGA's basically reconfigurable logic gate arrays?

Therefore potentially as software programmable as whatever processor configuration you can manage to stuff into the gate limits of the SKU?

Makes me think they are trying to smack talk a competitor before they are even competing, which doesn't bode well.
 
So, they are going to to this at 0.256 watts ?? I don't think so....


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 525.105.17 Driver Version: 525.105.17 CUDA Version: 12.0 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
| | | MIG M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 NVIDIA GeForce ... Off | 00000000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 41% 64C P2 256W / 320W | 689MiB / 16376MiB | 89% Default |
| | | N/A |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: |
| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |
| ID ID Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 N/A N/A 2645 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 120MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 3283 G cinnamon 19MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 3552529 G ...2gtk-4.0/WebKitWebProcess 12MiB |
| 0 N/A N/A 3758478 C ....3/Core_23.fah/FahCore_23 532MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 
Back
Top