A jury of your peers?

[techs]

If you were on trial, would you want the jury to be selected from ATOT?

 

[Capt Caveman]

No. Too many ignorant dumbasses here.

 

[OCGuy]

If you were ever on trial for screwing an underage girl, you would definately want an ATOT jury.

 

[shortylickens]

Oh no.
Not no but hell no!!

 

[zinfamous]

If you were ever on trial for screwing an underage girl, you would definately want an ATOT jury.

trudat.

 

[Newbian]

If you were ever on trial for screwing an underage girl, you would definately want an ATOT jury.

Or for shooting a cop as everyone here hates cops.

 

[ahenkel]

well I'd keep the P&N crowd off my jury. The deliberations would last forever and go nowhere.

 

[vshah]

if i could pick and choose...sure

 

[Cogman]

Depends on what I was being tried for. If religion was involved, HELL NO. If some sexual act was involved, yep. If a woman was involved, yep.

 

[BoomerD]

Depends on what I was being tried for. If religion was involved, HELL NO. If some sexual act was involved, yep. If a woman was involved, yep.

I dunno about that...wimmenz is unknown territory for most of the ATOT faithful...

 

[Ben90]

well I'd keep the P&N crowd off my jury. The deliberations would last forever and go nowhere.

I lol'd

 

[shortylickens]

Or for shooting a cop as everyone here hates cops.

Not me.

 

[OBLAMA2009]

the american justice system is a total fraud. i had to go to traffic court last year and 100% of the cases were decided in favor of the police officers, even though most cases came down to the officers word vs that of the driver. would i trust a panel of mean spirited citizens to do otherwise? no. so in the future i will just pay my fines and try to waste no time on the american injustice system

 

[Gibson486]

No. Too many ignorant dumbasses here.

yup, sums it up.

 

[bfdd]

Peers? PEERS?! How dare you! That repulsive display of humanity out there? NO WAY!

 

[Gibson486]

the american justice system is a total fraud. i had to go to traffic court last year and 100% of the cases were decided in favor of the police officers, even though most cases came down to the officers word vs that of the driver. would i trust a panel of mean spirited citizens to do otherwise? no. so in the future i will just pay my fines and try to waste no time on the american injustice system

LOL....you can't just say "Well, judge, I think the officer is wrong because I am not in the wrong". You have to have hardcore proof. You really got to go all out...this means using math and physics sometimes to prove that the officer didn't do things correctly or at least having some witness to help you out.

Think about, his testimony includes, "On XX:XX PM, a XXX colored ToyMazFord with license plate XXXXXX was driving through I-95. I clocked the vehicle going XX MPH from XX feet away. This section of I-95 is a XX MPH zone."

You better have evidence that disputes his testimony/validity if you plan to win.

 

[Possessed Freak]

Or for shooting a cop as everyone here hates cops.

Shooting a fatty... nobody on ATOT likes fatties.

 

[techs]

or for shooting a cop as everyone here hates cops.

shooting a fatty... Nobody on atot likes fatties.

qft

 

[AreaCode707]

Well, considering that jury selection attempts to filter out the extreme loonies who can't keep even a pretense of an open mind, I think a jury selected from Anandtech wouldn't be that bad.

 

[LtPage1]

Absolutely not.

 

[Corporate Thug]

everyone on ATOT is a millionaire with a super model wife...not an accurate representation of my peers.

 

[DrunkenSano]

If you were ever on trial for screwing an underage girl, you would definately want an ATOT jury.

 

[Cogman]

everyone on ATOT is a millionaire with a super model wife...not an accurate representation of my peers.

So you are the one one without a supermodel wife? Good to know