kamikazekyle
Senior member
- Feb 23, 2007
- 538
- 0
- 0
I'd probably take the less stressful job in all cases, even if it meant I could retire earlier by taking the more stressful job. Right now I have a bit of both. The job I'm in is so laid back it isn't funny, and I get paid decently above average for the area. I get 6 days off in a row every 14 days (still work 80 hours every 14 days), so if I do get any stress from work then the vacation-length block of time off every other week smoothes it all away. I get more stress from home than I do from work. Sometimes I think I have more free time at work than at home, so even if I made less than I do now I'd still keep this job.
Man, when I get another job it's going to be hard going back to working 5 on, 2 off. Those 6 days of time off in a row really do make a HUGE difference in stress and workload perception levels.
Man, when I get another job it's going to be hard going back to working 5 on, 2 off. Those 6 days of time off in a row really do make a HUGE difference in stress and workload perception levels.
