A Jewish Terrorist of the JDL (the Jewish Defence League) gets what he deserves in a federal jail !!

[The Linuxator]

Link

Oh so if so called bomb plotter is a Muslim he gets sent to Guantanamo(and that's without any evidence nor confession nor trial), while the Jewish plotter gets a 20-year jail term in a federal jail, I think he was lucky to get the planned 20 years. May he RIH along with all the terrorists out there of all relegions.

 

[mOeeOm]

The first of many?

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: mOeeOm
The first of many?

And lets not forget " The Jewish Defence League was founded in 1968 by a far-right US rabbi, Meir Kahane, who advocated the expulsion of all Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip." source BBC

 

[The Linuxator]

I think a full scale invistigation should be made into the JDL for possible Terrorist connections of it's members.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Link

Oh so if so called bomb plotter is a Muslim he gets sent to Guantanamo(and that's without any evidence nor confession nor trial), while the Jewish plotter gets a 20-year jail term in a federal jail, I think he was lucky to get the planned 20 years. May he RIH along with all the terrorists out there of all relegions.

That doesn't really make as much sense as most Muslim bomb plotters in the US have not been sent to Guantanamo. It's mainly for people abroad.

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Link

Oh so if so called bomb plotter is a Muslim he gets sent to Guantanamo(and that's without any evidence nor confession nor trial), while the Jewish plotter gets a 20-year jail term in a federal jail, I think he was lucky to get the planned 20 years. May he RIH along with all the terrorists out there of all relegions.

That doesn't really make as much sense as most Muslim bomb plotters in the US have not been sent to Guantanamo. It's mainly for people abroad.

I think to make things fair, the assets of the DFL should be frozen and members of the DFL should be looked up real good, and ppl who donate money / contribute money to the DFL should be considered as possible Terrorisim sponsors.

 

[The Linuxator]

And all the ppl who have connections with these Terrorisim acts should be sent to a Guantanamo clone, inorder to protect our National Security and well being.

 

[CanOWorms]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Link

Oh so if so called bomb plotter is a Muslim he gets sent to Guantanamo(and that's without any evidence nor confession nor trial), while the Jewish plotter gets a 20-year jail term in a federal jail, I think he was lucky to get the planned 20 years. May he RIH along with all the terrorists out there of all relegions.

That doesn't really make as much sense as most Muslim bomb plotters in the US have not been sent to Guantanamo. It's mainly for people abroad.

I think to make things fair, the assets of the DFL should be frozen and members of the DFL should be looked up real good, and ppl who donate money / contribute money to the DFL should be considered as possible Terrorisim sponsors.

How can they be possible terrorism sponsors? The JDL (which is what this article talks about, I'm not sure what the DFL is) is considered a terrorist organization by the FBI. It's even on the list of hate groups by the SPLC.

btw, I'm not sure why you're calling it the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. It is not the Anti-Defamation League if that's what you're trying to say.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Link

Oh so if so called bomb plotter is a Muslim he gets sent to Guantanamo(and that's without any evidence nor confession nor trial), while the Jewish plotter gets a 20-year jail term in a federal jail, I think he was lucky to get the planned 20 years. May he RIH along with all the terrorists out there of all relegions.

That doesn't really make as much sense as most Muslim bomb plotters in the US have not been sent to Guantanamo. It's mainly for people abroad.

I think to make things fair, the assets of the DFL should be frozen and members of the DFL should be looked up real good, and ppl who donate money / contribute money to the DFL should be considered as possible Terrorisim sponsors.

That has nothing to do with what I said, which pointed out a flaw in your post. I'm going to guess that you're some sort of whack job extremist, too, judging from your reply.

I don't know much about the JDL, but if it is an extremist terrorist organization then it should definitely be investigated. Looking on wikipedia, it seems that the FBI and State Department already considers it a terrorist organization. Therefore I would hope that its members are being investigated.

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Link

Oh so if so called bomb plotter is a Muslim he gets sent to Guantanamo(and that's without any evidence nor confession nor trial), while the Jewish plotter gets a 20-year jail term in a federal jail, I think he was lucky to get the planned 20 years. May he RIH along with all the terrorists out there of all relegions.

That doesn't really make as much sense as most Muslim bomb plotters in the US have not been sent to Guantanamo. It's mainly for people abroad.

I think to make things fair, the assets of the DFL should be frozen and members of the DFL should be looked up real good, and ppl who donate money / contribute money to the DFL should be considered as possible Terrorisim sponsors.

How can they be possible terrorism sponsors? The JDL (which is what this article talks about, I'm not sure what the DFL is) is considered a terrorist organization by the FBI. It's even on the list of hate groups by the SPLC.

btw, I'm not sure why you're calling it the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. It is not the Anti-Defamation League if that's what you're trying to say.

OK fixed.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
And all the ppl who have connections with these Terrorisim acts should be sent to a Guantanamo clone, inorder to protect our National Security and well being.

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone?

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
And all the ppl who have connections with these Terrorisim acts should be sent to a Guantanamo clone, inorder to protect our National Security and well being.

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone?

Are you saying that Guantanamo is US-Citezen free ?

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
And all the ppl who have connections with these Terrorisim acts should be sent to a Guantanamo clone, inorder to protect our National Security and well being.

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone?

Are you saying that Guantanamo is US-Citezen free ?

No. Note the phrasing of my question.

Why didn't you answer my question?

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone or Guantanamo itself? Or is this extremist getting pretty much expected punishment for his status, actions, and location? If he is, why do you want to discriminate against him?

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
And all the ppl who have connections with these Terrorisim acts should be sent to a Guantanamo clone, inorder to protect our National Security and well being.

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone?

Are you saying that Guantanamo is US-Citezen free ?

No. Note the phrasing of my question.

Why didn't you answer my question?

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone or Guantanamo itself? Or is this extremist getting pretty much expected punishment for his status, actions, and location? If he is, why do you want to discriminate against him?

I am not a discriminating against anyone , I beleive terrorisim is terrorisim and if a terrorist is a terrorist then he should be treated alike all others or all others should be treated like him get the hint ?

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
And all the ppl who have connections with these Terrorisim acts should be sent to a Guantanamo clone, inorder to protect our National Security and well being.

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone?

Are you saying that Guantanamo is US-Citezen free ?

No. Note the phrasing of my question.

Why didn't you answer my question?

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone or Guantanamo itself? Or is this extremist getting pretty much expected punishment for his status, actions, and location? If he is, why do you want to discriminate against him?

I am not a discriminating against anyone , I beleive terrorisim is terrorisim and if a terrorist is a terrorist then he should be treated alike all others or all others should be treated like him get the hint ?

Yes, you are discriminating against this person in your story. You want to treat him differently than most other people. I feel that everyone under the same conditions should be treated exactly the same. You apparently do not.

Again, just answer my question. Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone or Guantanamo itself? If your answer is no, then why do you want to treat this person differently?

 

[0marTheZealot]

Jose Padilla.

 

[CanOWorms]

Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Jose Padilla.

I'm guessing that there's a legal difference between an illegal enemy combatant and others depending upon the organization. I'm guessing supposedly associating with al-Qaeda = illegal enemy combatant.

I personally disagree with the whole Guantanomo thing myself.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Jose Padilla.

Again, note the inclusion of 'most' in my question...the question that he has refused to answer. But then again, Padilla isn't even in Guantanamo and I'm not even sure if any US citizen is still in Guantanamo...I don't think any is anymore. Makes one wonder why he wants to discriminate against this one particular person.

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Jose Padilla.

I'm guessing that there's a legal difference between an illegal enemy combatant and others depending upon the organization. I'm guessing supposedly associating with al-Qaeda = illegal enemy combatant.

I personally disagree with the whole Guantanomo thing myself.

I don't believe in the whole Guantanamo thing myself too , but I beleive in equal treatment too, what's the difference between the JDL and Al-Qaeeda, they both have the same purpose, and a terrorist from this side and another from that side should either be both in US custody in a normal detention form, or both in Guantanamo.
So is the US saying that becasue one of them has a US citezenship that one is human that has his rights protected, while the other isn't and shouldn't have his humane rights for a fair trial and good imprisonment conditions. If you think about it the one with the US citezenship should have a more severe punishment, considre it as great treason.

 

[techs]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Jose Padilla.

I'm guessing that there's a legal difference between an illegal enemy combatant and others depending upon the organization. I'm guessing supposedly associating with al-Qaeda = illegal enemy combatant.

I personally disagree with the whole Guantanomo thing myself.

I don't believe in the whole Guantanamo thing myself too , but I beleive in equal treatment too, what's the difference between the JDL and Al-Qaeeda, they both have the same purpose, and a terrorist from this side and another from that side should either be both in US custody in a normal detention form, or both in Guantanamo.
So is the US saying that becasue one of them has a US citezenship that one is human that has his rights protected, while the other isn't and shouldn't have his humane rights for a fair trial and good imprisonment conditions. If you think about it the one with the US citezenship should have a more severe punishment, considre it as great treason.

As a Jewish person I am saddened and outraged by the existence and policies of the JDL.
However, and I would say this if it were a Muslim person, celebrating the murder of a person in prison is also offensive to me.

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: techs

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: CanOWorms

Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Jose Padilla.

I'm guessing that there's a legal difference between an illegal enemy combatant and others depending upon the organization. I'm guessing supposedly associating with al-Qaeda = illegal enemy combatant.

I personally disagree with the whole Guantanomo thing myself.

I don't believe in the whole Guantanamo thing myself too , but I beleive in equal treatment too, what's the difference between the JDL and Al-Qaeeda, they both have the same purpose, and a terrorist from this side and another from that side should either be both in US custody in a normal detention form, or both in Guantanamo.
So is the US saying that becasue one of them has a US citezenship that one is human that has his rights protected, while the other isn't and shouldn't have his humane rights for a fair trial and good imprisonment conditions. If you think about it the one with the US citezenship should have a more severe punishment, considre it as great treason.

As a Jewish person I am saddened and outraged by the existence and policies of the JDL.
However, and I would say this if it were a Muslim person, celebrating the murder of a person in prison is also offensive to me.

I am not , but if he wasn't stopped at the last second he would have killed hundreds of Muslims (not to mention destroyed an important Mosque), caused hundreds of deaths in retaliaroy acts against fellow Americans that had nothing to do with the whole thing (on the hands of Muslim extremists) , he could have asassinated a CHRISITAN AMERICAN-LEBANESE CONGRESS MAN, which at the first sight would have been blamed at Muslims and Muslim extremists and possibly caused finger pointing inside Lebanon itself, causing a new civil war in there to set the country back into another 20 year civil war (which was originally causeed by the Israeli invasion of Lebanon). But obviously no one ever considers the destruction and damage such attacks would have caused.
I would have said the same thing about a Muslim extremist that was attempting to do the same thing to a Church or a Jewish temple so don't accuse me og BIAS here.

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
And all the ppl who have connections with these Terrorisim acts should be sent to a Guantanamo clone, inorder to protect our National Security and well being.

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone?

Are you saying that Guantanamo is US-Citezen free ?

No. Note the phrasing of my question.

Why didn't you answer my question?

Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone or Guantanamo itself? Or is this extremist getting pretty much expected punishment for his status, actions, and location? If he is, why do you want to discriminate against him?

I am not a discriminating against anyone , I beleive terrorisim is terrorisim and if a terrorist is a terrorist then he should be treated alike all others or all others should be treated like him get the hint ?

Yes, you are discriminating against this person in your story. You want to treat him differently than most other people. I feel that everyone under the same conditions should be treated exactly the same. You apparently do not.

Again, just answer my question. Are you saying that most other current US citizens connected to terrorist acts are sent to some sort of Guantanamo clone or Guantanamo itself? If your answer is no, then why do you want to treat this person differently?

Says the member with the Anti-Islam PROPAGANDA IN HIS SIG. :disgust:

 

[RabidMongoose]

Yet again you fail to answer my questions. I think that it's obvious that you hold some prejudices, similar to the character that is quoted in my sig. The fact that you think being against murdering children and bashing their heads in with rocks is wrong has exposed your true barbarity. If being against child murder is 'Anti-Islam', then so be it. I do not support bashing in a child's head with rocks and you apparently feel that such an action is glorious. Sorry, but I don't care what sky daddy you believe in - smashing a child's head with rocks is barbaric and cruel. You cannot hide behind your sky daddy and use it as a shield from criticism.

You have been exposed and you sicken me. Hopefully you'll never have kids and if you do, they are taken away from you before you murder htem.

 

[The Linuxator]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Yet again you fail to answer my questions. I think that it's obvious that you hold some prejudices, similar to the character that is quoted in my sig. The fact that you think being against murdering children and bashing their heads in with rocks is wrong has exposed your true barbarity. If being against child murder is 'Anti-Islam', then so be it. I do not support bashing in a child's head with rocks and you apparently feel that such an action is glorious. Sorry, but I don't care what sky daddy you believe in - smashing a child's head with rocks is barbaric and cruel. You cannot hide behind your sky daddy and use it as a shield from criticism.

You have been exposed and you sicken me. Hopefully you'll never have kids and if you do, they are taken away from you before you murder htem.

Again you are taking people onto a slipery slope, In Muslim countries these kind of punishments aren't some random punishments , and aren't their for fun.
You are twisitng the facts, in Islamic law defines maturity occurs at Pubirty, we say it's 18 it doesn't make it a Universal Law, and if that is their relegion then so be it who ever wants to be a Muslim that's what they have to deal with.

"You cannot hide behind your sky daddy and use it as a shield from criticism." WTF are you talking about , all that I am saying is that ppl have the freedom to beleive what they want, and if they don't want it they can go convert to something else Christianity seems like a good option, also being Jewish gives ppl alot of options in the world / media domination /facts twisting sector, not saying that all Jews are like that but on AT thats what I am noticing from ppl like you, and no you are the one hiding.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Again you are taking people onto a slipery slope, In Muslim countries these kind of punishments aren't some random punishments , and aren't their for fun.
You are twisitng the facts, in Islamic law defines maturity occurs at Pubirty, we say it's 18 it doesn't make it a Universal Law, and if that is their relegion then so be it who ever wants to be a Muslim that's what they have to deal with.

You must be a great humanitarian. I'm sorry, but atrocities all over the world deserve to be criticized. You may feel unsure of yourself over the bashing a child's head in with a rock, but I am personally confident enough to know that such an act is barbaric and wrong. I don't care if you're 'a Muslim that's what they have to deal with' or whatever other excuse. There is no excuse for bashing a child's brains in with stones! Only some sort of sick monster would ever try to justify such an act anywhere in the entire universe.

"You cannot hide behind your sky daddy and use it as a shield from criticism." WTF are you talking about , all that I am saying is that ppl have the freedom to beleive what they want, and if they don't want it they can go convert to something else Christianity seems like a good option, also being Jewish gives ppl alot of options in the world / media domination /facts twisting sector, not saying that all Jews are like that but on AT thats what I am noticing from ppl like you, and no you are the one hiding.

I am saying that if you believe in some sort of barbaric and cruel act, then you cannot use your religion as some sort of shield to prevent criticism. I don't care what supposed God you believe in or if you believe in the flying spaghetti monster or if you believe in the all mighty powers of Mongork the Omnipotent Monkey - if these beings tell you to support barbarity and you support it in today's times, then you are barbaric.

Again, people can believe whatever the hell they want. However, that doesn't make them immune from criticism. You apparently support bashing children's heads in with rocks because it was written in some text thousands of years ago. I'm going to criticize you for such a stance if you still support it in today's times.

I agree that people should be able to convert, but in Islamic Law converting away from Islam is punishable by death. Apostasy is punishable by death. I don't support such a strict position and if that makes me anti-Islam, anti-Christian, or anti-Jewish, or anti-whatever, then so be it. I don't support barbarity. You apparently do.

You have been exposed as a monster. And I am sure that you relish in your own barbarity. This explains why you wish to discriminate against this person in the article.

 

[The Linuxator]

I don't know what you are talking about, were does it say that I support barbarity, all I am saying is that if somone adheres to a relegion then I don't see what's the problem if his beleifs are imposed upon him makes sense now ?

You are just trying to switch this thread from the Jewish terrorist topic, obviousley your bias doesn't allow you to admit that what facts have unvealed of the Jewish Terrorist organisations that are responsible to alot of the devestation we Americans and the rest of the world have to suffer from. These Jewish extremists groups should be fought in the same fashion those crazy Muslim extremists are being fought with. They should be hunted down like diseased dogs. Becasue they have twisted the Jewish relegion the same way those Muslim extremist did, to serve their own benefits. get the hint ?