- Jun 23, 2001
- 27,730
- 8
- 0
So, if we take two land masses, each with equal amounts of natural resources, minerals, etc. Each is capable of supporting large human populations, however there is no infrastructure. None. Any humans have to build from scratch. You want food? Learn to farm. Want tools? have to make them yourself. And so on.
If you were to take all liberals, those who would vote Democratic regardless of the candidate, and place them all on one land mass. All the conservatives, those who would vote Republican, regardless of the candidate, and place them on the other land mass. Each group gets nothing but the clothes on their backs and the knowledge in their heads. No supplies, no food, no weapons, vehicles, no books, nothing like that.
Assuming no interaction, trade, communication, etc, between the two landmasses, say they're separated between wide expanses of treacherous waters, what happen to each group in 5 years? 10 years? 50 years? 100 years? 500 years? 1000 years?
Discuss.
If you were to take all liberals, those who would vote Democratic regardless of the candidate, and place them all on one land mass. All the conservatives, those who would vote Republican, regardless of the candidate, and place them on the other land mass. Each group gets nothing but the clothes on their backs and the knowledge in their heads. No supplies, no food, no weapons, vehicles, no books, nothing like that.
Assuming no interaction, trade, communication, etc, between the two landmasses, say they're separated between wide expanses of treacherous waters, what happen to each group in 5 years? 10 years? 50 years? 100 years? 500 years? 1000 years?
Discuss.
