• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A History of Violence

H

Horus

Platinum Member
Just got back from seeing this movie. I usually HATE David Cronenburg movies, but this one...

This one was amazing. The bloodshed was FAR beyond anything I expected. Actually, probably the most brutal display of movie violence I've ever seen, I'd think. It's not a mindless thriller, it makes you think, too. Best movie I've seen so far this year, and unexpectedly too.
 
I enjoyed the movie but there was a couple of serious scenes that had half the audience un easy and the other half bursting out in laughter.
 
Originally posted by: jdiddy
I enjoyed the movie but there was a couple of serious scenes that had half the audience un easy and the other half bursting out in laughter.
Click to expand...

That's Cronenberg for ya.
 
it was pretty good, suprisingly humorous at times...and the first time I've seen people in a mainstream movie with their faces blown off.
 
wtf i just started a thread on this movie after searching for it and nothing coming up ... great search engine :roll:

anyways, i thought the movie was pretty bad. It was just too drawn out and there were too many scenes where absolutely nothing happens. The action scenes however were well done but they weren't good enough to save this movie. Viggo sucks if he's not in LOTR. Hidalgo sucked and now this movie is not really worth more than a rental, if that. I would not recommend this movie.

And as another poster said, there were some sex scenes that were just laughable and made people in the theatre kind of uneasy and laugh at it, especially the "cheerleader 69" scene.
 
Originally posted by: purbeast0
wtf i just started a thread on this movie after searching for it and nothing coming up ... great search engine :roll:

anyways, i thought the movie was pretty bad. It was just too drawn out and there were too many scenes where absolutely nothing happens. The action scenes however were well done but they weren't good enough to save this movie. Viggo sucks if he's not in LOTR. Hidalgo sucked and now this movie is not really worth more than a rental, if that. I would not recommend this movie.

And as another poster said, there were some sex scenes that were just laughable and made people in the theatre kind of uneasy and laugh at it, especially the "cheerleader 69" scene.
Click to expand...


apparently over 80% of America disagrees with you...
 
so, do I bring my gf to see this movie or not? Shes a tomboy type girl, so she would probally like it I think.
 
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: purbeast0
wtf i just started a thread on this movie after searching for it and nothing coming up ... great search engine :roll:

anyways, i thought the movie was pretty bad. It was just too drawn out and there were too many scenes where absolutely nothing happens. The action scenes however were well done but they weren't good enough to save this movie. Viggo sucks if he's not in LOTR. Hidalgo sucked and now this movie is not really worth more than a rental, if that. I would not recommend this movie.

And as another poster said, there were some sex scenes that were just laughable and made people in the theatre kind of uneasy and laugh at it, especially the "cheerleader 69" scene.
Click to expand...


apparently over 80% of America disagrees with you...
Click to expand...

point being?
 
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: purbeast0
wtf i just started a thread on this movie after searching for it and nothing coming up ... great search engine :roll:

anyways, i thought the movie was pretty bad. It was just too drawn out and there were too many scenes where absolutely nothing happens. The action scenes however were well done but they weren't good enough to save this movie. Viggo sucks if he's not in LOTR. Hidalgo sucked and now this movie is not really worth more than a rental, if that. I would not recommend this movie.

And as another poster said, there were some sex scenes that were just laughable and made people in the theatre kind of uneasy and laugh at it, especially the "cheerleader 69" scene.
Click to expand...


apparently over 80% of America disagrees with you...
Click to expand...

point being?
Click to expand...


just because you didn't like it doesn't mean it sucks when the majority of people disagree
 
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
Originally posted by: purbeast0
wtf i just started a thread on this movie after searching for it and nothing coming up ... great search engine :roll:

anyways, i thought the movie was pretty bad. It was just too drawn out and there were too many scenes where absolutely nothing happens. The action scenes however were well done but they weren't good enough to save this movie. Viggo sucks if he's not in LOTR. Hidalgo sucked and now this movie is not really worth more than a rental, if that. I would not recommend this movie.

And as another poster said, there were some sex scenes that were just laughable and made people in the theatre kind of uneasy and laugh at it, especially the "cheerleader 69" scene.
Click to expand...


apparently over 80% of America disagrees with you...
Click to expand...

point being?
Click to expand...


just because you didn't like it doesn't mean it sucks when the majority of people disagree
Click to expand...

i hate to break it to you, but sucking/liking is an opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top