• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A Global "New Deal"?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sweet, if we're lucky the US can help bail out the rest of the world.

Ok being serious for a moment who knows. I am still sure the US is in better shape than most other Western nations. It cannot possibly stay as it is if they collapse, so it must be a team effort I suppose.
 
Holy fuck this is nuts. If this happens and that is a BIG IF what kind of money will be needed for something like this? I can only imagine that they will want the US to foot this crap. This administration is really annoying the crap out of me.


 
Originally posted by: Jeffg010
Holy fuck this is nuts. If this happens and that is a BIG IF what kind of money will be needed for something like this? I can only imagine that they will want the US to foot this crap.
Click to expand...

Eleventy trillion dollars.
 
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: masteryoda34
Originally posted by: winnar111
Brown wants lots of money from US Taxpayer
Click to expand...

Fixed.
Click to expand...

What? fuck off. They're just talking about protectionism in trade. We don't want your money any more than you want ours.
Click to expand...
This. Not sure where some of the stuff you guys are getting out of this story is coming from...
 
Kind of a misleading name calling it a global "new deal."

Regardless, this will probably get nowhere. It's already difficult to get two countries to agree with each other, what makes Brown think 20 countries will agree, especially on something like trade and financial regulation?
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Kind of a misleading name calling it a global "new deal."

Regardless, this will probably get nowhere. It's already difficult to get two countries to agree with each other, what makes Brown think 20 countries will agree, especially on something like trade and financial regulation?
Click to expand...

They might have to. Brown is a bumbling social retard though so he's not the man to do it. Never thought I'd say bring back Blair...
 
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: JS80
Kind of a misleading name calling it a global "new deal."

Regardless, this will probably get nowhere. It's already difficult to get two countries to agree with each other, what makes Brown think 20 countries will agree, especially on something like trade and financial regulation?
Click to expand...

They might have to. Brown is a bumbling social retard though so he's not the man to do it. Never thought I'd say bring back Blair...
Click to expand...

It's totally unnecessary. And even if they do come to some kind of faux agreement, you know someone will break it when times are good again. It's like OPEC, fake supply cut agreements, but when their pockets are hurting they cheat.
 
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Honestly, how can the U.S. ever possibly attempt to forge a global new deal, yes we are the largest GDP, but we only have 300M, there are billions of people whom a global new deal would have to support... how... that's all.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t.../uk/article5822265.ece
Click to expand...

Oil is the currency of the current Global deal crafted by Kissinger and the late King Faisal. Last I heard, it is still in effect. China, a new player, has been tweaking it with their own cheap resource, human labor.

We don't need a new new deal, yet. What we need (coming soon) is a distraction to get the economy out of the media's headline.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top