good then I won't have to listen to mindless crap directed at me from you.
Like I said, it's a hypothesis I heard bandied about. So yeah maybe they did. Or maybe they didn't do it as often as they did for others. Who Knows? I avoid opinion shows on cable channels anyways so I'm not gonna be testing it. You're assumptions about my beliefs D.I.L.L.A.F.F.
.....
It starts as a hypothesis, then people start to use confirmation bias and then we have another banned word. Just stop doing it in the first place. Nobody needs your "hypothesis."
Just because a sub-culture of black people publicly adopt the word "thug" to describe a lifestyle they've embraced (which appropriately conveys the intended meaning of the word), some people are saying we should no longer use the word "thug" to describe thugs -- especially when describing black thugs that embraced the word.
That reasoning does not make sense. That same mentality is why there's no universally correct / politically correct word for a black man visiting the United States from another country. If you can't call him "black," what can you call him? Multiple words before "black" are now un-cool and now that ones is also on the way out.
So, in the name of racial sensitivity, lets start doing that for thug/criminal/brute/ruffian/savage/hooligan. How long before we run out of synonyms?