Originally posted by: Evadman
... The gasius planets are farther out as that is where the leftover gasses from the formation of the sun get tossed by gravity ...
Almost, but not quite.
While it is true that the gaseous planets would have a better chance of forming because of their distance from the Sun, it is not due to extra gas being slung outward. There is a critical mass a planet must possess in order to have enough gravity to keep lighter gases (such as hydrogen and helium) from escaping the atmosphere.
If you ascribe to the theory that the solar system was formed by the collapse of a rotating gas cloud, the collapse happens in such a way that the density is highest in the center and decreases outward. Once the central protostar forms, there will also be a sharp temperature gradient outward from the center.
This means that ices get vaporized in the inner part of the system, and only heavy grains can form to be the progenitors of protoplanets. Farther out, ices can also form, and it is easier for material to agglomerate and larger protoplanets can form---to a point. Remember that the density is also decreasing outwards, so there is less material.
It is interesting to note that the orbit of Jupiter is at the point where the average temperature is about the freezing point of water. Also note the trend for the gaseous planets to decrease in mass as you go outwards. There was most likely a 'cleansing' of material from the solar system as the protostar reached the nuclear burning phase, and as typical of very young stars, experienced a strong mass outflow (stellar wind).
(Sorry, I took an oath to correct these types of things. You don't want them to take away my keys to the executive bathroom, do you?

)