9800xt vs 5950 fx ultra Latest review at Driver Heaven

[cindy22]

in this recent review it shows ati's 9800 xt beating nvidia in almost all test
using 3dmark2001 ,3dmark03 and games.
The article also points out that ATI has better destop image quality than nvidia's

check it out:

http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews/xt59/

 

[dragonic]

Linky

Linked for lazy people

 

[Corporate Thug]

well written and organized review

 

[nRollo]

Slow loading review- will have to read when I have more time.

 

[JustStarting]

notice that they didn't use the latest drivers from either manufacturer.

 

[Regs]

Originally posted by: shady06
well written and organized review

Sarcasm? That's the lowliest organized review I've seen yet.

 

[sugarkang]

wow. i had my heart set on ati 9800pro.
but given the bad press nVidia has been getting lately, i may have to go with nVidia just cos it means i might save a lot more money.

hell if there's a $100 difference between two cards, I'd go with nVidia.

i did the same thing a couple years ago with my radeon 8500 (remember that nightmare) and i've been happy with my purchase because of my superior hardware (at the time).

 

[Schadenfroh]

sooo slow

 

[lifeguard1999]

Painfully slow......

 

[BFG10K]

I skimmed the review and it seemed pretty decent.

 

[Pete]

The second page looks like a mess. I thought the FX was limited to four pixels outputted per clock no matter what? Also, no IQ comparisons screens is almost inexcusable nowadays.

The seasonal graph colors were a nice touch, though. :gift:

 

[BFG10K]

I thought the FX was limited to four pixels outputted per clock no matter what?

I thought it could do eight in certain situations?

 

[yhelothar]

I think it could do eight in multitexturing because it has two texturing units.