I recently upgraded from:
Athlon 1700+
Soyo K7ADA MOBO
384 PC 2700 RAM
GeForce 2 Pro
Segate 40GB ATA 100 x2 5400 rpm
Sound Blaster Audigy
To:
Athlon 2800+ (Barton)
Asus A7N8X Deluxe
Geil PC3200 RAM
Radeon 9800 Pro
Segate 40GB ATA 100 x2 5400 rpm
Soundblaster Audigy
So, as anyone would expect, I was expecting a pretty big step forward in the gaming department but so far that does not seem to be the case; let me explain; when running relatively new games i.e. NFSU, UT2K3, etc.. I do not get the steller performance that I expected; NFSU running @ 1024x768 32bit with 2x aa/af I get on average about 30 fps and it dips down into the teens at certain points... UT2K3 @ 1024x768 32bit 2x aa/af I get huge frame rates in smaller maps around 120 - 60 fps. In bigger maps such as avaris i get big frame rates in closed in areas and in open areas with lots of action it drops down to the high 30's.
Few reasons that IMO are the problems:
1. I purchased the 9800 Pro Off ebay, and in the auction it was listed as " Gunuine Built by ATI 9800 Pro w/ Samsung Memory " and in the fine print it said that the card was brand new and it was pulled from a DELL system, I did not think that would be a problem so I won the auction and got it for 194 USD s/h included. The card's stock clock according to Rage 3d is 378 Core and 337 Mem, I can overclock it to 400 Core and 369 Mem, I haven't pushed it further as of yet, the memory on the card reads: SAMSUNG 328 K4D26328E-GC2A. I don't know if this card is really a 9800 pro; i hear some people say that the memory should read in the 700 but I think they say that because the double the numbers because it's ddr, in that case mine is right where it should be. I was wondering if this card is really not a 9800 pro but something else that has been softmodded to read like one? so, here is a picture of the card maybe some of you can spot a fake: CARD
2. I haven't upgraded my hard-drives yet, but the soon will be replaced with a Segate 120GB SATA unit. I'm wondering if my current drives are creating the bottle neck?
I will post 3dmark and Aquamark scores in a few.
Any help/suggestions is well appreciated

Athlon 1700+
Soyo K7ADA MOBO
384 PC 2700 RAM
GeForce 2 Pro
Segate 40GB ATA 100 x2 5400 rpm
Sound Blaster Audigy
To:
Athlon 2800+ (Barton)
Asus A7N8X Deluxe
Geil PC3200 RAM
Radeon 9800 Pro
Segate 40GB ATA 100 x2 5400 rpm
Soundblaster Audigy
So, as anyone would expect, I was expecting a pretty big step forward in the gaming department but so far that does not seem to be the case; let me explain; when running relatively new games i.e. NFSU, UT2K3, etc.. I do not get the steller performance that I expected; NFSU running @ 1024x768 32bit with 2x aa/af I get on average about 30 fps and it dips down into the teens at certain points... UT2K3 @ 1024x768 32bit 2x aa/af I get huge frame rates in smaller maps around 120 - 60 fps. In bigger maps such as avaris i get big frame rates in closed in areas and in open areas with lots of action it drops down to the high 30's.
Few reasons that IMO are the problems:
1. I purchased the 9800 Pro Off ebay, and in the auction it was listed as " Gunuine Built by ATI 9800 Pro w/ Samsung Memory " and in the fine print it said that the card was brand new and it was pulled from a DELL system, I did not think that would be a problem so I won the auction and got it for 194 USD s/h included. The card's stock clock according to Rage 3d is 378 Core and 337 Mem, I can overclock it to 400 Core and 369 Mem, I haven't pushed it further as of yet, the memory on the card reads: SAMSUNG 328 K4D26328E-GC2A. I don't know if this card is really a 9800 pro; i hear some people say that the memory should read in the 700 but I think they say that because the double the numbers because it's ddr, in that case mine is right where it should be. I was wondering if this card is really not a 9800 pro but something else that has been softmodded to read like one? so, here is a picture of the card maybe some of you can spot a fake: CARD
2. I haven't upgraded my hard-drives yet, but the soon will be replaced with a Segate 120GB SATA unit. I'm wondering if my current drives are creating the bottle neck?
I will post 3dmark and Aquamark scores in a few.
Any help/suggestions is well appreciated
