Originally posted by: Sniper82
well it probably felt cheap probably because they are cheap cars 😀. Not gonna break the bank for a backup/2nd car though. Other than it feeling cheap did you have any issues with it?
Originally posted by: thedarkwolf
Hadn't the trans issues been pretty well fixed by 97. I know my parents old 93 still had problems yet it made it 200k miles before the trans crapped out. Which 3.0l? Is it the 12valve or the 24 valve one? The old 12 valve vulcan engine only puts out around 145hp but its unkillable. I think the 24v one had some problems during that time frame but I can't remember for sure.
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?
which 3 liter engine? there are two. the pushrod one is reputably more reliable.
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?
which 3 liter engine? there are two. the pushrod one is reputably more reliable.
IIRC the 3.8 is a lot better on the whole though
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?
which 3 liter engine? there are two. the pushrod one is reputably more reliable.
IIRC the 3.8 is a lot better on the whole though
No the 3.8 had headgasket problems. The 3.0, and the 4.6 and 5.0 v8s are some of the more reliable easy to fix/work on motors out there.
Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Sniper82
well it probably felt cheap probably because they are cheap cars 😀. Not gonna break the bank for a backup/2nd car though. Other than it feeling cheap did you have any issues with it?
I've owned a 97 LXi wagon for four years now. All I've had to do was keep tires on her and change the oil. I've got about 90k on the odometer. I love Fords - and isn't this the best selling car ever or something?
Originally posted by: CraigRT
See, thought it was the 3.0 that had HG problems... Not a Ford guy just thought I remember hearing that. 🙂
As much as I'm not a Ford fan, this is really admittedly a decent vehicle overall. Most people I know that have had a Taurus really do not have many issues aside from trans.
:shocked:Originally posted by: Jadow
I've been driving a 97 Taurus for 6 years. It has over 130k on it now. Other than having to replace an alternator for 400 bucks, it hasn't given me any trouble at all in the 6 years I've had it. I plan on driving it as long as I can.
Originally posted by: Perknose
:shocked:Originally posted by: Jadow
I've been driving a 97 Taurus for 6 years. It has over 130k on it now. Other than having to replace an alternator for 400 bucks, it hasn't given me any trouble at all in the 6 years I've had it. I plan on driving it as long as I can.
And, on most cars I've known, the alternator, like the water pump, was an easy DIY part.
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
look at it this way:
i know you're thinking "it's not that old, it's not that many miles, and just LOOK at that price!"
but for the same amount of money, you can get an early-90's honda that will actually be more reliable (despite having double the miles), get better gas mileage, be more fun to drive, and not make people laugh at you.
feel free to replace "honda" with "toyota, nissan, mazda."