• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

97 Ford Taurus any good?

Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?
 
well it probably felt cheap probably because they are cheap cars 😀. Not gonna break the bank for a backup/2nd car though. Other than it feeling cheap did you have any issues with it?
 
Tauruses have lots of transmission and front suspension issues. Motor wise the 3.0s are fairly solid. Other than that I think the 96-99 body style is ugly as sin.
 
Originally posted by: Sniper82
well it probably felt cheap probably because they are cheap cars 😀. Not gonna break the bank for a backup/2nd car though. Other than it feeling cheap did you have any issues with it?

I've owned a 97 LXi wagon for four years now. All I've had to do was keep tires on her and change the oil. I've got about 90k on the odometer. I love Fords - and isn't this the best selling car ever or something?
 
Hadn't the trans issues been pretty well fixed by 97. I know my parents old 93 still had problems yet it made it 200k miles before the trans crapped out. Which 3.0l? Is it the 12valve or the 24 valve one? The old 12 valve vulcan engine only puts out around 145hp but its unkillable. I think the 24v one had some problems during that time frame but I can't remember for sure.
 
Originally posted by: thedarkwolf
Hadn't the trans issues been pretty well fixed by 97. I know my parents old 93 still had problems yet it made it 200k miles before the trans crapped out. Which 3.0l? Is it the 12valve or the 24 valve one? The old 12 valve vulcan engine only puts out around 145hp but its unkillable. I think the 24v one had some problems during that time frame but I can't remember for sure.

Two of my family members have a 99 Taurus and the transmissions are both going bad at about 100k.
 
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?

which 3 liter engine? there are two. the pushrod one is reputably more reliable.
 
Drove one in driver's ed and hated it. I was a fairly capable driver at the time too and had driven a few different cars.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?

which 3 liter engine? there are two. the pushrod one is reputably more reliable.

IIRC the 3.8 is a lot better on the whole though
 
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?

which 3 liter engine? there are two. the pushrod one is reputably more reliable.

IIRC the 3.8 is a lot better on the whole though

No the 3.8 had headgasket problems. The 3.0, and the 4.6 and 5.0 v8s are some of the more reliable easy to fix/work on motors out there.
 
Originally posted by: CrackRabbit
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Sniper82
Looking to get a backup car and seen a sharp 97 Taurus with 107,000 miles on it for $1950. Has a 3.0 v6 in it. Wondering are these pretty reliable cars even with high mileage?

which 3 liter engine? there are two. the pushrod one is reputably more reliable.

IIRC the 3.8 is a lot better on the whole though

No the 3.8 had headgasket problems. The 3.0, and the 4.6 and 5.0 v8s are some of the more reliable easy to fix/work on motors out there.

See, thought it was the 3.0 that had HG problems... Not a Ford guy just thought I remember hearing that. 🙂

As much as I'm not a Ford fan, this is really admittedly a decent vehicle overall. Most people I know that have had a Taurus really do not have many issues aside from trans.
 
Originally posted by: JasonCoder
Originally posted by: Sniper82
well it probably felt cheap probably because they are cheap cars 😀. Not gonna break the bank for a backup/2nd car though. Other than it feeling cheap did you have any issues with it?

I've owned a 97 LXi wagon for four years now. All I've had to do was keep tires on her and change the oil. I've got about 90k on the odometer. I love Fords - and isn't this the best selling car ever or something?

I have 2000 Taurus, it's silver. Since Ford didn't touch the body from 2000-2006, every 10th car I see is mine, same color and everything. Probably once a month I almost try to open somebody else's car by accident at the mall or grocery store parking lot 🙂

I see far more Taurus then most other cars. I had a '95 before this. Sad Ford stopped making them in '06 🙁 Might look into getting a Fusion next year...
 
Consumer Reports gives it an overall "Average" with only "fair" marks on Trans., Elect. sys., Brakes, and Power Equip.

No poor marks.

 
Originally posted by: CraigRT

See, thought it was the 3.0 that had HG problems... Not a Ford guy just thought I remember hearing that. 🙂

As much as I'm not a Ford fan, this is really admittedly a decent vehicle overall. Most people I know that have had a Taurus really do not have many issues aside from trans.

i dunno whether it was a 'problem,' but the head gaskets on my vulcan v6 taurus needed replaced when ~8 years old.

i'm pretty sure they fixed the tranny probs eventually. it may be the last body style, however.
 
Alright.....the Taurus is actually a decent ride. However, the overall quality of the car is questionable. Interior may be prone to little problems here and there. As for the engine quality, just take good care of it and it may make it to 175k with no trouble. For the money, it's probably a good deal.....however, plan an exit strategy when it's time to get rid of it. You may have trouble unloading it if something major breaks.
 
HG problems were on the 95 windstars and 94 t-birds with the 3.8's btw. Those years ALL the 95 windstars were recalled, some t-birds only though.

Problems with ford trannys is if you dont service them on a regular bassis and then one day after having 70K on the od decide to do it (dodge is the same way) they go to sh!t not long after the service is done. And then if you dont do the service at all you get around 100K or so and then they go. Key is to always service it regularly and there wont be any problems at all.

But the 97 Taurus had tranny problems due to neglect and squeaks from the front struts. Other then that with the 3.0 and regular oil changes 200K= wouldnt be out of line. Just make sure to pop off the oil cap while the engine is running. If you see no junk under the cap and no smoke pouring out of the hole you should be good to go. OH and check the fluid and be prepaired for a tranny.
 
I have a 99 Taurus with 70k, the 3.0v6 has nice power, car is roomy and seats are nice. Had some minor suspension and transmission problems, other than that I love the car.
 
I've been driving a 97 Taurus for 6 years. It has over 130k on it now. Other than having to replace an alternator for 400 bucks, it hasn't given me any trouble at all in the 6 years I've had it. I plan on driving it as long as I can.
 
Originally posted by: Jadow
I've been driving a 97 Taurus for 6 years. It has over 130k on it now. Other than having to replace an alternator for 400 bucks, it hasn't given me any trouble at all in the 6 years I've had it. I plan on driving it as long as I can.
:shocked:

And, on most cars I've known, the alternator, like the water pump, was an easy DIY part.

 
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: Jadow
I've been driving a 97 Taurus for 6 years. It has over 130k on it now. Other than having to replace an alternator for 400 bucks, it hasn't given me any trouble at all in the 6 years I've had it. I plan on driving it as long as I can.
:shocked:

And, on most cars I've known, the alternator, like the water pump, was an easy DIY part.

Yeah, 400 bucks... ouch. Sounds like someone ripped him off on the labor or something :frown:
 
look at it this way:

i know you're thinking "it's not that old, it's not that many miles, and just LOOK at that price!"

but for the same amount of money, you can get an early-90's honda that will actually be more reliable (despite having double the miles), get better gas mileage, be more fun to drive, and not make people laugh at you.

feel free to replace "honda" with "toyota, nissan, mazda."
 
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
look at it this way:

i know you're thinking "it's not that old, it's not that many miles, and just LOOK at that price!"

but for the same amount of money, you can get an early-90's honda that will actually be more reliable (despite having double the miles), get better gas mileage, be more fun to drive, and not make people laugh at you.

feel free to replace "honda" with "toyota, nissan, mazda."

Turns out the Taurus was leaking anti-freeze from somewhere(heatcore area I think). So I pass on it. I might be getting a 92 Nissan Sentra in good condition with 163000 miles. I drove it and it sounds/drives good and the CV Joints(boot),Fluids and all looked fine. The oil looked a little dark but he said it was due for a oil change. Transmission Fluid did look brownish red but not black and didn't smell burnt. He had it priced for $1250 but said he could do $1100. If I get it I am gonna get the oil changed and probably transmission fluid changed first thing.

Are about any older honda, toyota, nissan, mazdas reliable?
 
Back
Top