otispunkmeyer
Lifer
any one think that the XT version of the 9600 is just all bark n no bite?
having looked at some reviews i was quite amazed to see that the XT outperformed the Pro by an almost un-noticable amount (like 5% or sumthing) even tho its got that low k stuff and is 100mhz faster. even in pixel shader intensive stuff u would be hard pressed to notice the extra performance.
whats even better is the fact that the old 9500pro can keep up and beat the XT, most probably because of its 8 pipes, (does 8 pipes at 275mhz = 4 pipes at 550mhz?)
i still say if u can find one get a 9500pro, but i dont reckon the 9600xt is worth the extra green over the 9600pro
having looked at some reviews i was quite amazed to see that the XT outperformed the Pro by an almost un-noticable amount (like 5% or sumthing) even tho its got that low k stuff and is 100mhz faster. even in pixel shader intensive stuff u would be hard pressed to notice the extra performance.
whats even better is the fact that the old 9500pro can keep up and beat the XT, most probably because of its 8 pipes, (does 8 pipes at 275mhz = 4 pipes at 550mhz?)
i still say if u can find one get a 9500pro, but i dont reckon the 9600xt is worth the extra green over the 9600pro