9600 np vs 9500 pro

Fabio

Senior member
Oct 12, 1999
930
0
71
www.fierceugly.com
Forgive my ignorance here but I am a little confused. I currently own a radeon 9600 that is oc'd to 475/375 with 128mb memory. I am contemplating going to a stock speed 9500pro 128mb. Which is the better performer? Doesn't the 9500 have 8 pipelines as opposed to 4 for the 9600?


Thanks for the input,

Fabio
 

butch84

Golden Member
Jan 26, 2001
1,202
0
76
Im pretty sure the 9500pro would own your current card hardcore. However, i have never overclocked a 9600np, but i think its probable that your overclocking narrows the gap. To be honest, i doubt it would really be worth it. Just wait a little while for 9700s to drop in price, or just spend a bit more so your upgrade will actually be worth it. (I have seen 9700s go for as little as $185 around here)

good luck :)
butch
 

JBT

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
12,094
1
81
the 9500 pro is faster but I wouldn't spend much money on an upgrade for it unless its like 20 bucks.
 

Dantzig

Golden Member
Oct 11, 1999
1,301
0
0
The 9500 Pro is somewhere on the level of the 9600 XT (higher if you overclock/softmod it).
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
9600 = 325MHz, 4 pipelines.
9500 Pro = 275MHz, 8 pipelines (about even with a 9600 at 550MHz)
Get a 9600 Pro, 9500 Pro or 9600 XT...the 9600 and 9500np are not worth it.
 

lazybum131

Senior member
Apr 4, 2003
231
0
76
Originally posted by: Fabio
I currently own a radeon 9600 that is oc'd to 475/375 with 128mb memory.

That's a pretty large overclock. I believe the 9600np is just an underclocked version of the card, so you should've closed the gap in performance with the better mid-range cards.

I'm surprised at the memory overclock! From 200MHz to 375MHz, this should make ur card faster then a stock 9600pro!
The 9600pro is clocked at 400/300, the XT at 500/300. Your overclock should probably make ur card perform pretty close to the 9600XT, which performs well against the 9500pro.

So I would suggest against getting the 9500pro in your case, unless it's for next to nothing.