9.7 inch ICS Android tablet for $120 (wholesale)

MrX8503

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2005
4,529
0
0
I like how he says, its really fast and all he does is scroll apps. That's some serious performance! I don't understand why reviewers don't run an app to test fluidity.

For $120 though, it looks pretty good. Doesn't look like something that will come to the states though.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
I like how he says, its really fast and all he does is scroll apps. That's some serious performance! I don't understand why reviewers don't run an app to test fluidity.

For $120 though, it looks pretty good. Doesn't look like something that will come to the states though.

Actually it probably is coming to the states, what i've read is that they'll sell to other companies to rebrand/rebadge.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,810
126
I like how he says, its really fast and all he does is scroll apps. That's some serious performance! I don't understand why reviewers don't run an app to test fluidity.

For $120 though, it looks pretty good. Doesn't look like something that will come to the states though.

It's not fast and it showed in the video. specs are terrible even for $120. I'm usually one to accept lower quality for lower price but there's minimum baseline. I think this is overpriced.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,291
7,280
136
It's not fast and it showed in the video. specs are terrible even for $120. I'm usually one to accept lower quality for lower price but there's minimum baseline. I think this is overpriced.

Even if it's not the greatest tablet in the world, for $120 it's probably a pretty good deal. Even if Android isn't as efficient as iOS, the single core A4 and 256 MB of RAM in my first generation iPad was good enough for most things. If the come to the US at that price I'll probably pick one up. At that price I can definitely accept a few shortcomings.

I have a feeling that the quantities will be limited. That they're using a 4:3 screen suggests that it might be some left-over stock that was originally for an iPad. If that's the case, they probably won't have continued production runs unless they continue buying screens, which seems unlikely if they want to compete against Apple's buying power.
 

MaxFusion16

Golden Member
Dec 21, 2001
1,512
1
0
looks good, finally android is adopting 4:3 aspect ratio screens, much better than that stupid widescreen.

I might pick up one once it comes over even though I hate android, it'd be a nice cheap gift/toy for kids.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
looks good, finally android is adopting 4:3 aspect ratio screens, much better than that stupid widescreen.

Heh, I came in here to deride that 4:3 aspect ratio. :p PCs, desktops and notebooks stopped using that shitty aspect ratio in the mid 90s. Let it stay dead. 16x9 is better for video in landscape and better for reading in portrait. Win on both.

FYI guys, you can already get Chinese tablets running ICS with similar innards for only a little more than that right now. :)
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
32,334
10,427
136
Heh, I came in here to deride that 4:3 aspect ratio. :p PCs, desktops and notebooks stopped using that shitty aspect ratio in the mid 90s. Let it stay dead. 16x9 is better for video in landscape and better for reading in portrait. Win on both.

FYI guys, you can already get Chinese tablets running ICS with similar innards for only a little more than that right now. :)

That.

Its one of the things that irk me about my touchpad. Theres not a massive amount of things that tablets are better than other things at. One of them is as a portable video viewer, effectively shrinking the screen by giving it a daft aspect ratio doesn't help.
 

akugami

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2005
6,210
2,549
136
Heh, I came in here to deride that 4:3 aspect ratio. :p PCs, desktops and notebooks stopped using that shitty aspect ratio in the mid 90s. Let it stay dead. 16x9 is better for video in landscape and better for reading in portrait. Win on both.

FYI guys, you can already get Chinese tablets running ICS with similar innards for only a little more than that right now. :)

I prefer a 16x10 ratio but 16x9 would be a decent second choice. For tablets, 4x3 can definitely die a horrible horrible death.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
That's great for $120 but I want a dual core cpu and 1gb of ram as a minimum. The casing looks really cheap as well - they should use metal.

1024x768 is also too low a resolution for a 10" screen imo.
 

MaxFusion16

Golden Member
Dec 21, 2001
1,512
1
0
you are all wrong, just because widescreen works for TV and movies doesn't mean it'll work for tablets. some people just don't get it.

you sit down to watch a video or a movie, so widescreen is good for covering your entire field of view.

however, you hold a tablet, and they are supposed to mimic a natural medium, in this case, paper and books, which are very close to the 4:3 ratio.

did you ever think to yourself that "gee, I wish this book was in widescreen format", no? didn't think so.

I made fun of the original iphone's 4:3 ratio during jobs' keynote launch back in 2007, how it was an awkward resolution and would be terrible for movies. But guess what, I was wrong, I used one and I was hooked, the screen was marvelous, it felt just right.

A good product has a purpose, it does a few things extremely well; it shouldn't try to do everything, because then, it'd just be a compromise.
 

MaxFusion16

Golden Member
Dec 21, 2001
1,512
1
0
That's great for $120 but I want a dual core cpu and 1gb of ram as a minimum. The casing looks really cheap as well - they should use metal.

1024x768 is also too low a resolution for a 10" screen imo.

seems low now after the new retina display, but that didn't stop apple from selling millions of "low res" ipads over the last 2 years.

for $120, I'm not gonna bitch about the resolution.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
It's true. At that price they are great. It's cheap to the point that schools could now buy one for every student and get rid of all the paper books that they have, and they would probably save money in doing so.
 

dagamer34

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2005
2,591
0
71
Something tells me they are using rejected iPad panels for not being up to snuff in the quality department...
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,810
126
Something tells me they are using rejected iPad panels for not being up to snuff in the quality department...

or leftover Touchpad screen. Both shared the same IPS 9.7 screen.

My local Craigslist shows several 16gb Touchpad for sale $150-175 range.
 
Last edited:

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Probably what has happened is that Apple no longer uses these panels so they have gotten dirt cheap as a result.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
That's not fast enough for flash. Could be a good splashtop thin client and e reader.
They could spend a few more dollars on better SOC, flash, RAM, and build, and have a decent $200 10" tablet. That is a pretty key pricepoint.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Probably what has happened is that Apple no longer uses these panels so they have gotten dirt cheap as a result.

Apple still uses them,but not as much with retina iPad out, so there is spare capacity out there.
 

Puddle Jumper

Platinum Member
Nov 4, 2009
2,835
1
0
you are all wrong, just because widescreen works for TV and movies doesn't mean it'll work for tablets. some people just don't get it.

you sit down to watch a video or a movie, so widescreen is good for covering your entire field of view.

however, you hold a tablet, and they are supposed to mimic a natural medium, in this case, paper and books, which are very close to the 4:3 ratio.

did you ever think to yourself that "gee, I wish this book was in widescreen format", no? didn't think so.

I made fun of the original iphone's 4:3 ratio during jobs' keynote launch back in 2007, how it was an awkward resolution and would be terrible for movies. But guess what, I was wrong, I used one and I was hooked, the screen was marvelous, it felt just right.

A good product has a purpose, it does a few things extremely well; it shouldn't try to do everything, because then, it'd just be a compromise.

This might shock you but if you rotate a 16:9 or 16:10 display 90 degrees you get tons of vertical real estate which is excellent for reading. Basically widescreen is better for both media and text and 4:3 has no redeeming qualities.
 

MrX8503

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2005
4,529
0
0
I prefer 16:10 over 16:9. 16:9 offers good vertical space in portrait, but its horrible in landscape mode. For a tablet that you use mainly for movies, this is a plus, but I'm certain that most people don't spend most of their time watching movies on a tablet. They're either surfing or using apps.