- Nov 20, 1999
- 22,994
- 779
- 126
I like how he says, its really fast and all he does is scroll apps. That's some serious performance! I don't understand why reviewers don't run an app to test fluidity.
For $120 though, it looks pretty good. Doesn't look like something that will come to the states though.
I like how he says, its really fast and all he does is scroll apps. That's some serious performance! I don't understand why reviewers don't run an app to test fluidity.
For $120 though, it looks pretty good. Doesn't look like something that will come to the states though.
It's not fast and it showed in the video. specs are terrible even for $120. I'm usually one to accept lower quality for lower price but there's minimum baseline. I think this is overpriced.
looks good, finally android is adopting 4:3 aspect ratio screens, much better than that stupid widescreen.
Heh, I came in here to deride that 4:3 aspect ratio.PCs, desktops and notebooks stopped using that shitty aspect ratio in the mid 90s. Let it stay dead. 16x9 is better for video in landscape and better for reading in portrait. Win on both.
FYI guys, you can already get Chinese tablets running ICS with similar innards for only a little more than that right now.![]()
Heh, I came in here to deride that 4:3 aspect ratio.PCs, desktops and notebooks stopped using that shitty aspect ratio in the mid 90s. Let it stay dead. 16x9 is better for video in landscape and better for reading in portrait. Win on both.
FYI guys, you can already get Chinese tablets running ICS with similar innards for only a little more than that right now.![]()
That's great for $120 but I want a dual core cpu and 1gb of ram as a minimum. The casing looks really cheap as well - they should use metal.
1024x768 is also too low a resolution for a 10" screen imo.
Something tells me they are using rejected iPad panels for not being up to snuff in the quality department...
Probably what has happened is that Apple no longer uses these panels so they have gotten dirt cheap as a result.
you are all wrong, just because widescreen works for TV and movies doesn't mean it'll work for tablets. some people just don't get it.
you sit down to watch a video or a movie, so widescreen is good for covering your entire field of view.
however, you hold a tablet, and they are supposed to mimic a natural medium, in this case, paper and books, which are very close to the 4:3 ratio.
did you ever think to yourself that "gee, I wish this book was in widescreen format", no? didn't think so.
I made fun of the original iphone's 4:3 ratio during jobs' keynote launch back in 2007, how it was an awkward resolution and would be terrible for movies. But guess what, I was wrong, I used one and I was hooked, the screen was marvelous, it felt just right.
A good product has a purpose, it does a few things extremely well; it shouldn't try to do everything, because then, it'd just be a compromise.
This might shock you but if you rotate a 16:9 or 16:10 display 90 degrees you get tons of vertical real estate which is excellent for reading. Basically widescreen is better for both media and text and 4:3 has no redeeming qualities.
i might buy one so i can hack it
seems like a good cheap little computer
exactly. itll be a cheap alternative to an ipadYeah that would be fun. I'll bet you could hit 2ghz on the cpu. There is a lot you can do with a rooted android system.
i might buy one so i can hack it
seems like a good cheap little computer