This is the game I use to make a point about the problem between magazine/web site 'preview' (marketing) and 'review'.
The box in the store says as a gamepro.com quote: "the way Dungeons & Dragons was always meant to be played."
Wow, great quote!
It comes from the *preview* on the site:
"My take: This is the exact game I want on Xbox Live. It uses gameplay I'm familiar with in a setting that's older than my parents and invites me to have other people play with me. I could easily see knocking this one out with a couple of a friends on a late Saturday or a lazy Sunday -- the way Dungeons & Dragons was always meant to be played."
Now, let's look at the same site's 1.5 of 5 star *review*:
"It's games like Dungeons & Dragons: Daggerdale that give Gary Gygax's basement disciples a bad reputation -- not the source material...
At the risk of repeating myself, the game is just broken."
So we go from 'the way D&D was meant to be played' to 'games like this give D&D a bad reputation'.
I wrote to the site with this info, they didn't respond.