8th Grader Arrested Over Internet Cartoon that refers to killing a teacher

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
8th Grader Arrested Over Internet Cartoon


LOS ANGELES -- An 8th grader in Walnut Creek, Calif., who was arrested for creating an animated cartoon that allegedly referred to killing a teacher, is getting an unexpected vacation from school Thursday -- and both he and his mother say authorities overreacted.

Walnut Creek police handcuffed and arrested the 14-year-old student at Walnut Creek Intermediate School for making a threat with an electronic after the boy posted his cartoon on the Internet last week.

The cartoon allegedly contained the phrase, "Maybe I should kill him and urinate on his remains."

The youngster doesn't deny drafting the offending cartoon, but says it was part of a series he created to poke fun at the school and never intended to be taken seriously.

His mother says officials made a rash decision considering that her son has not been in trouble at school before.

But the president of the Walnut Creek School Board says school officials have to take all threats seriously to protect their staff and students.

The student will remain suspended until at least Monday.

The district attorney's office would not say whether the boy would be charged because he is a minor.


Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press
 

zimu

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2001
6,209
0
0
it is retarded, but after seeing how f***ed up so many of the kids in U.S. public schools are (countless examples of shootings etc) you gotta take even the stupidest "threat" seriously.

it is overreacting, i agree, but necessary...

btw, anybody got a link to the cartoon?
 

Kilgor

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
3,292
0
0
Why would someone want to pee on the body after you've killed them? Kid's not right in the head.
 

Ikonomi

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2003
6,056
1
0
Damn. I almost want to see the cartoon in question, but it probably sucks like most webcomics! :Q
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,120
4,640
136
Kid's not right in the head.

As a general rule, 8th graders are not right in the head :), but equating "Maybe I should kill him and urinate on his remains" with "poking fun" goes waaaay out there.
 

Pepsei

Lifer
Dec 14, 2001
12,895
1
0
Now, if the story of the cartoon came out AFTER he shoot up the school, people would point the finger at school saying that they "ignored" the signs.

However, what percentage of kids who done this actually become cold blooded killers?
 

Originally posted by: allisolm
Kid's not right in the head.

As a general rule, 8th graders are not right in the head :), but equating "Maybe I should kill him and urinate on his remains" with "poking fun" goes waaaay out there.
Agreed. There was a thread about this type of thing last year, and my sentiments were identical. However, I was called the "ATOT Retard of the Month" by Skoorb. It's unpopular but I hold it's true.

EDIT: link to thread
 

brxndxn

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2001
8,475
0
76
I think this is free speech. The idea that he can be arrested for poking fun of a teacher is horrible. When I was in 8th grade, I made all sorts of sadistic cartoons and said things that would scare people now - I was in fvcking 8th grade!!

The kid didn't directly threaten the teacher. He should not be arrested for that. The school should be free to suspend him or expell him (or whatever overreacting punishment they have in mind) - but why the fvck does the school get to have him arrested?!
 

Originally posted by: brxndxn
I think this is free speech. The idea that he can be arrested for poking fun of a teacher is horrible. When I was in 8th grade, I made all sorts of sadistic cartoons and said things that would scare people now - I was in fvcking 8th grade!!

The kid didn't directly threaten the teacher. He should not be arrested for that. The school should be free to suspend him or expell him (or whatever overreacting punishment they have in mind) - but why the fvck does the school get to have him arrested?!
I don't think the school should have had him arrested - but I do think that some sort of discipline should have been handed down. If the kid's supposedly so smart, why'd he publish a cartoon depicting a sadistic 'fantasy' involving the death of a teacher in the public domain?
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Originally posted by: Kilgor
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
lol sadly i did that once...

You killed and urinated on somebody???

Come on, who hasn't!


;)

I'm doing it right now. It's funtastic.



Authorities overreacted. THey should have confronted the child instead of being attention-grabbing-whores that have nothing better to do than possibly ruin a young boy' life.

The boy was just messing around. That is why the school and parents should have had a conference.


They did not.

And know the worlds realizses that parts of LA are a rotten cesspool of anonymity and insignificance.
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,120
4,640
136
However, what percentage of kids who done this actually become cold blooded killers?

Klebold and Harris come to mind.
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: allisolm
However, what percentage of kids who done this actually become cold blooded killers?

Klebold and Harris come to mind.

To judge everyone by the lowest common denominator is to lower your denominance as well..


These peopel are idiots.


FUnny thing is that the kid was prolly normal. THe juvy and the social tension/apprehension he will now bear witness to and be a target of will however ruin him...


A round of applause for the fvktards running hte LA schools.
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,120
4,640
136
To judge everyone by the lowest common denominator is to lower your denominance as well..

I think I'd be worried if I just knew what "denominance" was. :)
 

Kilgor

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
3,292
0
0
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: allisolm
However, what percentage of kids who done this actually become cold blooded killers?

Klebold and Harris come to mind.

To judge everyone by the lowest common denominator is to lower your denominance as well..


These peopel are idiots.


FUnny thing is that the kid was prolly normal. THe juvy and the social tension/apprehension he will now bear witness to and be a target of will however ruin him...


A round of applause for the fvktards running hte LA schools.

All though it is sad nowadays you have to judge people by the lowest common denominator. If my parents found me drawing a picture depicting me killing my teacher then saying maybe I should urinate on him. They would have thought I was sick in the head, and I would have to agree. If he was doing what they say he is not normal. You need to intervene when the children are still young so they don't grow up thinking thier demented thinking is normal. Kids today have no moral compass whatsoever why should we expect them to when they are being raised by the TV and every time someone tries to reel one of the hellions in everybody says the little darlings rights are being violated.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
how sad.

how many have not had thoughts of killing a teacher or such?

granted he should NOT have put it on a public access. But still they are over reacting.