80% of Americans oppose sanctuary cities

Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
New poll showing that an overwhelming majority of Americans oppose sanctuary cities and a majority approve the Executive orders for hiring more border patrol agents and to revoke money for sanctuary cities. A slight majority oppose the wall, but 75% of Americans favor increased border patrols. 53% of people supported President Trump's old travel ban. It looks like his support for immigration issues is still favored.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...ricans-overwhelmingly-oppose-sanctuary-cities
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,021
26,902
136
So don't live in a sactuary city. 75% of Americans never see a BP agent so I can see why they might support more of them. Those of us who have to put up with bullshit, un-American BP checkpoints as we drive from one part of America to another think the 75% can go f themselves. It's easy to demand stuff that doesn't affect you personally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
35,322
28,573
136
Let me guess, red state retards like the OP want to tell blue states what they can and cannot do because states' rights only apply to things conservatives want them to apply to.
 

MajinCry

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2015
2,495
571
136
New poll showing that an overwhelming majority of Americans oppose sanctuary cities and a majority approve the Executive orders for hiring more border patrol agents and to revoke money for sanctuary cities. A slight majority oppose the wall, but 75% of Americans favor increased border patrols. 53% of people supported President Trump's old travel ban. It looks like his support for immigration issues is still favored.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...ricans-overwhelmingly-oppose-sanctuary-cities

Internet conservaterrorists post fake news! SAD! Don't even have proper websites, very low T!
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
Sometimes reading the usual lefty posts here in ATP&N you get the impression that most of the country is far left of center and that ultra-liberal standards are the norm, then you realize that this is a far left echo chamber, a safe haven for our little progressive flowers. The country and it's citizens approve of the way that President Trump is beginning to handle the immigration problem and support what and how he's doing it. It's this forum that's out of step with the country.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Lügenpost


Sometimes reading the usual lefty posts here in ATP&N you get the impression that most of the country is far left of center and that ultra-liberal standards are the norm, then you realize that this is a far left echo chamber, a safe haven for our little progressive flowers. The country and it's citizens approve of the way that President Trump is beginning to handle the immigration problem and support what and how he's doing it. It's this forum that's out of step with the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MongGrel

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,113
925
126
Solutions:
1. Cut federal funding to cities that refuse to follow the law, and if that doesn't work,
2. Send in federal agents to nab those criminals, who are being harbored in the sanctuary cities, and if that doesn't work,
3. Start arresting governors and mayors who harbor criminal illegals.

Eventually, the problem can be solved. Peaceful means first, more force gradually, until they finally get it and comply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snarfbot

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,121
24,025
136
Solutions:
1. Cut federal funding to cities that refuse to follow the law, and if that doesn't work,
2. Send in federal agents to nab those criminals, who are being harbored in the sanctuary cities, and if that doesn't work,
3. Start arresting governors and mayors who harbor criminal illegals.

Eventually, the problem can be solved. Peaceful means first, more force gradually, until they finally get it and comply.

Case in point......
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,719
2,064
136
Solutions:
1. Cut federal funding to cities that refuse to follow the law, and if that doesn't work,
2. Send in federal agents to nab those criminals, who are being harbored in the sanctuary cities, and if that doesn't work,
3. Start arresting governors and mayors who harbor criminal illegals.

Eventually, the problem can be solved. Peaceful means first, more force gradually, until they finally get it and comply.
From the story :
"Trump has signed an executive order directing Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly to find ways to starve these sanctuary cities of federal funding. A Reuters analysis found the top 10 sanctuary cities in the U.S. receive $2.27 billion in federal funding for programs ranging from public health services to early childhood education."
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-sanctuarycities-idUSKBN1592V9
 

MajinCry

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2015
2,495
571
136
Solutions:
1. Cut federal funding to cities that refuse to follow the law, and if that doesn't work,
2. Send in federal agents to nab those criminals, who are being harbored in the sanctuary cities, and if that doesn't work,
3. Start arresting governors and mayors who harbor criminal illegals.

Eventually, the problem can be solved. Peaceful means first, more force gradually, until they finally get it and comply.

Why do you hate States' rights?
 

MajinCry

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2015
2,495
571
136
So you support States making their own voting laws? Good to know, or is it just a rampant case of hypocrisy?

Sometimes reading the usual lefty posts here in ATP&N you get the impression that most of the country is far left of center and that ultra-liberal standards are the norm, then you realize that this is a far left echo chamber, a safe haven for our little progressive flowers. The country and it's citizens approve of the way that President Trump is beginning to handle the immigration problem and support what and how he's doing it. It's this forum that's out of step with the country.


Why do you hate free speech?
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,021
26,902
136
Solutions:
1. Cut federal funding to cities that refuse to follow the law, and if that doesn't work,
2. Send in federal agents to nab those criminals, who are being harbored in the sanctuary cities, and if that doesn't work,
3. Start arresting governors and mayors who harbor criminal illegals.

Eventually, the problem can be solved. Peaceful means first, more force gradually, until they finally get it and comply.
Option 2 is the way the Constitution works. The other two options are just fascist daydreaming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vic

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,101
5,640
126
Solutions:
1. Cut federal funding to cities that refuse to follow the law, and if that doesn't work,
2. Send in federal agents to nab those criminals, who are being harbored in the sanctuary cities, and if that doesn't work,
3. Start arresting governors and mayors who harbor criminal illegals.

Eventually, the problem can be solved. Peaceful means first, more force gradually, until they finally get it and comply.

1) The Cities are following the Law
2) That's what's supposed to happen
3) They are not harbouring criminal illegals