8 seconds from connection to infection

dighn

Lifer
Aug 12, 2001
22,820
4
81
yeah the last time I installed XP on this computer, it got infected immediately after it booted into the desktop...
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
I think 8 seconds is the norm for a machine to get infected.

Take a packet capture of "the internet" at the major access points and you'll see a whole lot of "background noise" that is just worms and what not scanning for systems to infect.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
hardware firewall, software firewall, virus scanner, spyware scanner ftw!
 

Ipno

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2001
1,047
0
0
I thought this was going to be another thread about Pamela Anderson.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
ha

thats why i love having a custom SP2 install CD w/ all updates and fixes, firewall is there on boot, not the greatest FW but it works till i can get my AV and FW progies installed, being behind a router helps also
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Router + software firewall FTW

stateful hardware firewall + software firewall + AV + anti-spyware + autopatching + IDS = pretty darn safe.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: Anubis
ha

thats why i love having a custom SP2 install CD w/ all updates and fixes, firewall is there on boot, not the greatest FW but it works till i can get my AV and FW progies installed, being behind a router helps also
i wouldn't even bother connecting to the internet until all the stuff is installed.
 

DivideBYZero

Lifer
May 18, 2001
24,117
2
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Anubis
ha

thats why i love having a custom SP2 install CD w/ all updates and fixes, firewall is there on boot, not the greatest FW but it works till i can get my AV and FW progies installed, being behind a router helps also
i wouldn't even bother connecting to the internet until all the stuff is installed.

FTW
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
Oh come on people. I'm sitting here on an unsecured (though VPN'd) wireless connection with nothing protecting the computer whatsoever. At home, all I have is a NAT layer. I periodically run scans on all my machines and there's nothing. Ever. Why waste CPU time with senseless redundant layers of security when one layer is enough.
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
"8 seconds from connection to infection"

That would make a great tag line for a condom company...
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Oh come on people. I'm sitting here on an unsecured (though VPN'd) wireless connection with nothing protecting the computer whatsoever. At home, all I have is a NAT layer. I periodically run scans on all my machines and there's nothing. Ever. Why waste CPU time with senseless redundant layers of security when one layer is enough.

because one layer is not enough. your computer can get a virus or worm just by browsing a web page.
 

brian_riendeau

Platinum Member
Oct 15, 1999
2,256
0
0
Sure, and aliens can suck out your brains while you sleep if you forget to put on your tin foil hat before bed.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: brian_riendeau
Sure, and aliens can suck out your brains while you sleep if you forget to put on your tin foil hat before bed.

Care to elaborate?

I mean its not like I do this for a living or anything.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Originally posted by: Anubis
ha

thats why i love having a custom SP2 install CD w/ all updates and fixes, firewall is there on boot, not the greatest FW but it works till i can get my AV and FW progies installed, being behind a router helps also
QFT - even the PE disc is patched. :D

Quesy! Great minds. :D
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,445
19,898
146
Hardware firewall (router). And since XP, XP firewall allowing exceptions.

That's it. And I've never been infected by viruses or hit by spyware.

Of course, I never download iffy crap and no one else touches my systems.

The only thing I run Adaware for is to remove bad cookies.
 

myusername

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2003
5,046
0
0
"Don't get cocky, kid" :Q

Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Oh come on people. I'm sitting here on an unsecured (though VPN'd) wireless connection with nothing protecting the computer whatsoever. At home, all I have is a NAT layer. I periodically run scans on all my machines and there's nothing. Ever. Why waste CPU time with senseless redundant layers of security when one layer is enough.

Originally posted by: Amused
Hardware firewall (router). And since XP, XP firewall allowing exceptions.
That's it. And I've never been infected by viruses or hit by spyware.
Of course, I never download iffy crap and no one else touches my systems.
The only thing I run Adaware for is to remove bad cookies.

Originally posted by: myusername

I thought my system was pretty tight, but I wanted to connect another box (via netgear switch/router), so I just enabled the Server Service and the Computer Browser Service .. File and Printer Sharing is NOT enabled at the adapter. As a result of enabling the Server Service, I end up with Kerio popping up several outgoing connection attempts, which I deny.

outgoing
-Microsoft File and Printer Sharing
-local point 0.0.0.0:1186
-remote point 127.0.0.1:445

outgoing (this repeats 3 times)
-Microsoft File and Printer Sharing
-local point 192.168.0.3:1188
-remote point 128.77.59.140:139

This has happened several times now, each time with a different local port (but always netbios 139 on the receiving side).

-----

...my running processes are all legit, and I have run the following software:

AVG
F-Secure AV
Kapersky AV
avast AV
adaware SE
spybot s&d
zero spyware
pest patrol
spysweeper
hijack this
tds-3

None of which have turned up *anything* suspicious or malicious.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
I miss the good 'ol days when we used adaware for the first time....the excitement generated when the scan would pull off 50-100+ threats. :)

Its been no fun these last few years tho...waste my time scanning and getting only a bad cookie or two. :(
 

TechnoPro

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2003
1,727
0
76
Originally posted by: jjsole
I miss the good 'ol days when we used adaware for the first time....the excitement generated when the scan would pull off 50-100+ threats. :)

Its been no fun these last few years tho...waste my time scanning and getting only a bad cookie or two. :(

50-100? Back when it was really bad, I would see 1,000+ on a bogged down machine. I think my all time record that I saw was 1,400 on a clients system. Amazing how it was repairable at that point.