8 charged with conspiracy to riot in furtherance of terrorism

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Genx87
Who said we support thought crimes? We support prosecuting people who were clearly working towards a goal of creating chaos with the use of deadly devices.

We shall see what washes out in the trial (I'll be watching closely). I'll hold my piece till then and ready to eat crow if necessary. The conspiracy to riot claims are not my concern as much as the patriot acts addition of "in furtherance of terrorism" bullshit. That patriot act document gives those government entities access into homes/people/lives which were not allowed before. Now we will see what happens. I don't think people truly understand the magnitude of this.

Well if these were the hooligans who were raided pre-convention. They were clearly upto no good contrary to their plea's of innocence. Unless of course all the devices and weapons the police showed on the news were fabricated.
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Here is a post about the incident from the brother of one of those charged:
http://blog.ianbicking.org/200...n-trimmer-and-protest/

The guy (Ian Bicking) is somewhat known in the Python community.


One of the best points he makes is that there are a lot of people (and plenty of them here on ATPN) that say that support protest, without actually supporting any aspect of it - ie people can protest, they just shouldn't do it in the street, because it causes traffic jams, they shouldn't do it during conventions because its impolite, they shouldn't be loud etc etc. So when you get down to it, these people's idea of supporting protest means they want people to gather somewhere out of sight and out of mind without disturbing anyone or anything... which is to say, they do not support protest at all.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
^ Except protesting has been that way for decades; in fact, you could argue all the way back to the civil war when a small group of Northern protesters, in favor of secession, attempted to block Congress' daily activities. They were promptly broomed out of site. The right the protest doesn't give you the right to disrupt the lives of everyone around you. Sometimes protests will do that and especially so when the issue is clearly polarizing and/or what is being protested is clearly destructive (Vietnam for example), but to claim you don't support protesting because of some misguided ideal that you should be able to block businesses from doing their work, block traffic, or even block Congress is quite obviously over the top. Good protesters will find creative, legal ways to protest. Bad protesters will commit crimes and do themselves a disservice in the process (like PC Surgeon, for example).
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Wake me up if/when these assclowns are sent to Gitmo and/or refused their fair day in court.

if neither of those things happens, then we shall let the evidence, once it's known, speak for itself.

:cookie: for the OP and his lollipop-infested fantasies about violently overthrowing the U.S. government... :roll:
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: palehorse

:cookie: for the OP and his lollipop-infested fantasies about violently overthrowing the U.S. government... :roll:

Indeed, it seems as if PC Surgeon truly is a loony anarchist Paulbot nut.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: palehorse

:cookie: for the OP and his lollipop-infested fantasies about violently overthrowing the U.S. government... :roll:

Indeed, it seems as if PC Surgeon truly is a loony anarchist Paulbot nut.

You can call me a paul bot or a nut, but not an anarchist ;)

Can't follow along? That's not my problem.

 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: palehorse

:cookie: for the OP and his lollipop-infested fantasies about violently overthrowing the U.S. government... :roll:

Indeed, it seems as if PC Surgeon truly is a loony anarchist Paulbot nut.

You can call me a paul bot or a nut, but not an anarchist ;)

Can't follow along? That's not my problem.

Incredible coming from someone that really can't seem to follow along. Someone who doesn't get that these people were not arrested for what you ridiculously deemed as "thought" crimes, but real actions that could have easily had violent consequences. Yes, you can get arrested for that; welcome to 200 years ago.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: palehorse

:cookie: for the OP and his lollipop-infested fantasies about violently overthrowing the U.S. government... :roll:

Indeed, it seems as if PC Surgeon truly is a loony anarchist Paulbot nut.

You can call me a paul bot or a nut, but not an anarchist ;)

Can't follow along? That's not my problem.

Incredible coming from someone that really can't seem to follow along. Someone who doesn't get that these people were not arrested for what you ridiculously deemed as "thought" crimes, but real actions that could have easily had violent consequences. Yes, you can get arrested for that; welcome to 200 years ago.

Say what you will liberfake. Its a circular argument at this point with you. Now about me being anarchist? Skip that part? Figures.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: palehorse

:cookie: for the OP and his lollipop-infested fantasies about violently overthrowing the U.S. government... :roll:

Indeed, it seems as if PC Surgeon truly is a loony anarchist Paulbot nut.

You can call me a paul bot or a nut, but not an anarchist ;)

Can't follow along? That's not my problem.

Incredible coming from someone that really can't seem to follow along. Someone who doesn't get that these people were not arrested for what you ridiculously deemed as "thought" crimes, but real actions that could have easily had violent consequences. Yes, you can get arrested for that; welcome to 200 years ago.

Say what you will liberfake. Its a circular argument at this point with you. Now about me being anarchist? Skip that part? Figures.

Skip what part; you called me a fake libertarian with zero to back it up, at least I have your asinine attempts to defend violent anarchists as a reasonable incite into what you truly feel about politics. You being an anarchist wouldn't be a stretch, you're a conspiracy theorist too afterall.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb


Skip what part; you called me a fake libertarian with zero to back it up, at least I have your asinine attempts to defend violent anarchists as a reasonable incite into what you truly feel about politics. You being an anarchist wouldn't be a stretch, you're a conspiracy theorist too afterall.

You're a fake liberal. Easy to prove. Your view is bigger government control, we see that here and in the bank bailouts. I'm sure if I cared enough I could dig up more.

I defend the anarchists right to protest. They were not violent, another twist by your liberfake mouth. They are ACCUSED of "conspiracy", not the actual act of violence. Someone of your intelligence should be able to differentiate the two. But I guess your agenda doesn't allow for truth, only to obfuscate.

Prove I am an anarchist or STFU. I believe in LESS government and thats as close as it gets. As for me being a conspiracy theorist, maybe, but who gives a fuck? Why do you give a shit?
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb


Skip what part; you called me a fake libertarian with zero to back it up, at least I have your asinine attempts to defend violent anarchists as a reasonable incite into what you truly feel about politics. You being an anarchist wouldn't be a stretch, you're a conspiracy theorist too afterall.

You're a fake liberal. Easy to prove. Your view is bigger government control, we see that here and in the bank bailouts.

False. Bank bailouts are widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives (traditional or neoconservatives) because the pure business and economic sense says bailing out in rare instances is the overwhelmingly superior alternative to doing nothing.

I'm sure if I cared enough I could dig up more.

You can't, because you just don't have a clue what's going on.

I defend the anarchists right to protest. They were not violent, another twist by your liberfake mouth. They are ACCUSED of "conspiracy", not the actual act of violence. Someone of your intelligence should be able to differentiate the two. But I guess your agenda doesn't allow for truth, only to obfuscate.

For the 3rd or 4th time already; if you don't have evidence that the accusations of the undercover agents isn't true, shut the fuck up. Secondly, I'll repost again what these guys did, because quite clearly it isn't getting through that thick skull of yours: "A separate affidavit from undercover agents who infiltrated the group said members had discussed stretching chains across a nearby highway, kidnapping delegates and disrupting the convention with burning tires, urine and feces, and explosives including Molotov cocktails".

If you are suggesting the undercover agents shouldn't have done anything about it, again, I cannot help that your thinking skills are that poor. The alternative would have been to let them hurt convention personnel before arresting them, which is clearly a worse alternative to simply arresting them before they did any violent harm, which is what they did and clearly the right decision.

Prove I am an anarchist or STFU.

You should follow your own standards for calling me a "fake" libertarian kid. Besides, your pathetic sympathy for these lunatics is already well documented in this thread. Of course, that could just be your poor critical thinking skills bearing themselves out and not necessarily you being a true anarchist. But my evidence for you being an anarchist is about as strong as me not being a libertarian. Do you get it yet? Christ I hope so. :laugh:

As for me being a conspiracy theorist, maybe, but who gives a fuck? Why do you give a shit?

Being a conspiracy theorist shows you lack basic reasoning and reading skills.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb


Skip what part; you called me a fake libertarian with zero to back it up, at least I have your asinine attempts to defend violent anarchists as a reasonable incite into what you truly feel about politics. You being an anarchist wouldn't be a stretch, you're a conspiracy theorist too afterall.

You're a fake liberal. Easy to prove. Your view is bigger government control, we see that here and in the bank bailouts.

False. Bank bailouts are widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives (traditional or neoconservatives) because the pure business and economic sense says bailing out in rare instances is the overwhelmingly superior alternative to doing nothing.

Prove it. Show me "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives" or STFU.

I'm sure if I cared enough I could dig up more.

You can't, because you just don't have a clue what's going on.

I could, just don't care to.

I defend the anarchists right to protest. They were not violent, another twist by your liberfake mouth. They are ACCUSED of "conspiracy", not the actual act of violence. Someone of your intelligence should be able to differentiate the two. But I guess your agenda doesn't allow for truth, only to obfuscate.

For the 3rd or 4th time already; if you don't have evidence that the accusations of the undercover agents isn't true, shut the fuck up. Secondly, I'll repost again what these guys did, because quite clearly it isn't getting through that thick skull of yours: "A separate affidavit from undercover agents who infiltrated the group said members had discussed stretching chains across a nearby highway, kidnapping delegates and disrupting the convention with burning tires, urine and feces, and explosives including Molotov cocktails".

Heres one for you, how about you prove that the paid informants ARE telling the truth? Prove it or STFU. We have been over this so many times, you would think your puny mind would be able to grasp it by now.

If you are suggesting the undercover agents shouldn't have done anything about it, again, I cannot help that your critical thinking skills are that poor. The alternative would have been to let them hurt convention personnel before arresting that, a clearly worse alternative to simply arresting them before they did any violent harm.

You have no proof that they were going to harm anyone. That paid informant may be lying, YOU DO NOT KNOW. We will see when it comes out in court.

Prove I am an anarchist or STFU.

You should follow your own standards for calling me a "fake" libertarian kid. Besides, your pathetic sympathy for these lunatics is already well documented in this thread. Of course, that could just be your poor critical thinking skills bearing themselves out and not necessarily you being a true anarchist. But my evidence for you being an anarchist is about as strong as me not being a libertarian. Do you get it yet? Christ I hope so. :laugh:

Laugh it up liberfake. Are you really this ignorant? I guess so. I'm not going to explain it to you again. Go back and read the thread a few hundred times more.

As for me being a conspiracy theorist, maybe, but who gives a fuck? Why do you give a shit?

Being a conspiracy theorist shows you lack basic reasoning and reading skills.

Wow you sure have one bruised ego. Who kicked you in school? :laugh:

Listen here liberfake fool, how about you go read your little school books and get prechewed meals from your government and then come back to spew more gibberish in this thread. Wait for it..... here it comes...3...2...1...
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Prove it. Show me "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives" or STFU.

rofl:

http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/Q621.aspx

I could, just don't care to.

Sure.

Heres one for you, how about you prove that the paid informants ARE telling the truth? Prove it or STFU.

Undercover agents have extraordinarily high success rates in apprehension of and conviction of the guilty: http://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/terrorism/169/. In this specific case, they have claimed to have substantial evidence on plots to kidnap, molatov cocktails, etc. There is NO reason to doubt them until their success rates start becoming much, much lower than the 95%+ that it is.

We have been over this so many times, you would think your puny mind would be able to grasp it by now.

Point blank; you just aren't informed enough to debate people here.

You have no proof that they were going to harm anyone. That paid informant may be lying, YOU DO NOT KNOW. We will see when it comes out in court.

Again, you are dumb as hell if you don't believe these undercover agents given they have historically been highly reliable. You just don't live in the real world if you cannot accept this reality.

Laugh it up liberfake. Are you really this ignorant? I guess so. I'm not going to explain it to you again. Go back and read the thread a few hundred times more.

Come on, you can do better than this. Well, maybe not.

Wow you sure have one bruised ego. Who kicked you in school? :laugh:

Is this your way of saying you're a conspiracy theorist and you can cry if you want to?

Listen here liberfake fool, how about you go read your little school books and get prechewed meals from your government and then come back to spew more gibberish in this thread. Wait for it..... here it comes...3...2...1...

rofl, yes, reading books. Now there?s a thought. Try it sometime big guy.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Prove it. Show me "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives" or STFU.

rofl:

http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/Q621.aspx

Ok a guy wrote a book. Hardly "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives". :roll:

I could, just don't care to.

Sure.

You got it.

Heres one for you, how about you prove that the paid informants ARE telling the truth? Prove it or STFU.

Undercover agents have extraordinarily high success rates in apprehension of and conviction of the guilty: http://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/terrorism/169/. In this specific case, they have claimed to have substantial evidence on plots to kidnap, molatov cocktails, etc. There is NO reason to doubt them until their success rates start becoming much, much lower than the 95%+ that it is.

You cannot take another situation and provide it as proof to this one. Try again.

We have been over this so many times, you would think your puny mind would be able to grasp it by now.

Point blank; you just aren't informed enough to debate people here.

It's not hard to debate liberfake fools like you.

You have no proof that they were going to harm anyone. That paid informant may be lying, YOU DO NOT KNOW. We will see when it comes out in court.

Again, you are dumb as hell if you don't believe these undercover agents given they have historically been highly reliable. You just don't live in the real world if you cannot accept this reality.

Sorry liberfake, you have to use contents in THIS case to prove the point. You have no additional information regarding the authenticity of the paid informants claims. Again, try again.

Laugh it up liberfake. Are you really this ignorant? I guess so. I'm not going to explain it to you again. Go back and read the thread a few hundred times more.

Come on, you can do better than this. Well, maybe not.

Yes, you need to read more.

Wow you sure have one bruised ego. Who kicked you in school? :laugh:

Is this your way of saying you're a conspiracy theorist and you can cry if you want to?

Cute, I always knew you like childrens shows.

Listen here liberfake fool, how about you go read your little school books and get prechewed meals from your government and then come back to spew more gibberish in this thread. Wait for it..... here it comes...3...2...1...

rofl, yes, reading books. Now there?s a thought. Try it sometime big guy.

I read what I want to read, not what I'm told to. Anyways, hows those prechewed meals there liberfake?
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Ok a guy wrote a book. Hardly "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives". :roll:

You don't read books, so I'm not particularly surprised you don't know what's going on. Like I said, it's widely accepted, it's only the degree to which it is done that can be intelligently debated. No one that makes any important decisions in Washington supports never bailing out vital financial institutions, it just doesn't happen anymore.

You cannot take another situation and provide it as proof to this one. Try again.

It's common sense. Again, I don't expect a mental midget to understand any of this, so I'm not surprised you're struggling here.

It's not hard to debate liberfake fools like you.

This "liberfake" stuff also isn't very creative or funny. Hate to break it to you.

Sorry liberfake, you have to use contents in THIS case to prove the point. You have no additional information regarding the authenticity of the paid informants claims. Again, try again.

Like I said, intelligent people can see I presented a nearly fool-proof case that undercover agents have a high success rate in finding guilty people and presenting evidence to convict them. This is the advantage of reading school books.

Yes, you need to read more.

Hilarious coming from someone that derides a person that reads school books. :laugh:

I read what I want to read, not what I'm told to. Anyways, hows those prechewed meals there liberfake?

This would explain why you lack basic critical reading and thinking skills. Go figure.
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Ok a guy wrote a book. Hardly "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives". :roll:

You don't read books, so I'm not particularly surprised you don't know what's going on. Like I said, it's widely accepted, it's only the degree to which it is done that can be intelligently debated. No one that makes any important decisions in Washington supports never bailing out vital financial institutions, it just doesn't happen anymore.

I read what book I want to read, not the ones spoonfed to me. You have FAILED to prove "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives". Try again.

You cannot take another situation and provide it as proof to this one. Try again.

It's common sense. Again, I don't expect a mental midget to understand any of this, so I'm not surprised you're struggling here.

Sorry liberfake fool, you cannot throw in bullshit and expect it to stick.

It's not hard to debate liberfake fools like you.

This "liberfake" stuff also isn't very creative or funny. Hate to break it to you.

I think it describes you perfectly :laugh:

Sorry liberfake, you have to use contents in THIS case to prove the point. You have no additional information regarding the authenticity of the paid informants claims. Again, try again.

Like I said, intelligent people can see I presented a nearly fool-proof case that undercover agents have a high success rate in finding guilty people and presenting evidence to convict them. This is the advantage of reading school books.

Actually, your "advantage" is taking whatever your government spoon feeds you as the gospel. Sorry, I prefer to be a thinking man not a "yes man" like you.

Yes, you need to read more.

Hilarious coming from someone that derides a person that reads school books. :laugh:

Boy you're stupid. Read it again. I didn't deride you for reading books, I derided you for reading someone elses assigned books to you. You need to follow along here, you're starting to fall apart :laugh:

I read what I want to read, not what I'm told to. Anyways, hows those prechewed meals there liberfake?

This would explain why you lack basic critical reading and thinking skills. Go figure.
[/quote]

Funny, coming from someone who didn't get the last comment :laugh:

How long do you want to keep this up liberfake? I'm down ;)

 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

I read what book I want to read, not the ones spoonfed to me.

Let's be real here; at some point in a person's young life they have to be spoon-fed books, that's how every single person on the planet begins their education. It's how you integrate, synthesize, and learn from that material that sets you apart from the apes. So please, enough of this BS about spoon-fed school books, you look exceedingly thick just uttering such lunacy.

You have FAILED to prove "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives". Try again.

Try reading the book, kook. The information is there if you bothered to look (which we all know you haven't). Also, trying reading a newspaper once and a while; try the WSJ or the weekly Economist.

I think it describes you perfectly :laugh:

No no, you don't get it; it makes you look crazy.

Actually, your "advantage" is taking whatever your government spoon feeds you as the gospel. Sorry, I prefer to be a thinking man not a "yes man" like you.

Is this your way of raising the white flag, because sometimes I can't tell when you're desperate and crying and when you're just your usual ignorant self. Sorry buddy, that link said it all if you cared to look. Hell, I'll even provide the quote for you; "From what is now known, it appears that well-placed undercover agents and extensive electronic surveillance can largely be credited with the recent apprehension in England of scores of suspects who authorities say were planning to blow up as many as ten airliners on their way to the United States".

Boy you're stupid. Read it again. I didn't deride you for reading books, I derided you for reading someone elses assigned books to you. You need to follow along here, you're starting to fall apart :laugh:

School books are by definition assigned to people in school. Serious question; are you mentally handicapped? Honestly, I don't want to find out I've been picking on some obese retarded Southern hick this whole time.

Funny, coming from someone who didn't get the last comment :laugh:

Ugh, this is getting sad.

How long do you want to keep this up liberfake? I'm down ;)

Nah, you're reallly not.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
I just visit this thread now to extract my daily pound of bloody flesh for the blood thirsty evil anarchists then move on. :gift:

 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

I read what book I want to read, not the ones spoonfed to me.

Let's be real here; at some point in a person's young life they have to be spoon-fed books, that's how every single person on the planet begins their education. It's how you integrate, synthesize, and learn from that material that sets you apart from the apes. So please, enough of this BS about spoon-fed school books, you look exceedingly thick just uttering such lunacy.

Then you grow up.

You have FAILED to prove "widely considered sensible among liberals and conservatives". Try again.

Try reading the book, kook. The information is there if you bothered to look (which we all know you haven't). Also, trying reading a newspaper once and a while; try the WSJ or the weekly Economist.

I don't like your spoon fed government socialists propaganda. You read it, continue in your "liberfakeness".

I think it describes you perfectly :laugh:

No no, you don't get it; it makes you look crazy.

No no, you don't get it, it describes you perfectly.

Actually, your "advantage" is taking whatever your government spoon feeds you as the gospel. Sorry, I prefer to be a thinking man not a "yes man" like you.

Is this your way of raising the white flag, because sometimes I can't tell when you're desperate and crying and when you're just your usual ignorant self. Sorry buddy, that link said it all if you cared to look. Hell, I'll even provide the quote for you; "From what is now known, it appears that well-placed undercover agents and extensive electronic surveillance can largely be credited with the recent apprehension in England of scores of suspects who authorities say were planning to blow up as many as ten airliners on their way to the United States".

I see reading comprehension classes in your future. Try to follow along liberfake. Let me quote myself since you cannot read very well. "You have no additional information regarding the authenticity of the paid informants claims." Trying to prove the truthfullness of these paid informants by way of paid informant in england is completely idiotic. Try again.

Boy you're stupid. Read it again. I didn't deride you for reading books, I derided you for reading someone elses assigned books to you. You need to follow along here, you're starting to fall apart :laugh:

School books are by definition assigned to people in school. Serious question; are you mentally handicapped? Honestly, I don't want to find out I've been picking on some obese retarded Southern hick this whole time.

Yeah and AFTER SCHOOL you GROW UP. Something you still haven't done. You continue to eat regurgitated crap, instead of thinking for yourself. Thats the problem, you only know what you have been spoon fed, never had to think for yourself. That shows up here like a neon sign in a dark alley.

Funny, coming from someone who didn't get the last comment :laugh:

Ugh, this is getting sad.

Whats the matter liberfake? Get caught with your pants down? :laugh:

How long do you want to keep this up liberfake? I'm down ;)

Nah, you're reallly not.
[/quote]

Actually, I am. Which is why I am still here ripping your ass a new one. Maybe you can check out a book on "Free Thinking" or something. The problem with that is, its not something learned in a book, you have to develop that skill on your own. Good luck, I'll be pulling for you!!! Go Liberfake! Go!
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Then you grow up.

Right, and that's something that you need to go through on your own. Stay in school I always say.

I don't like your spoon fed government socialists propaganda. You read it, continue in your "liberfakeness".

You don't like school books so I'm not surprised you don't like newspapers either I suppose. And lmao @ the WSJ being "socialist". Jesus Christ. :laugh:

No no, you don't get it, it describes you perfectly.

Your comebacks are horrid and unoriginal.

I see reading comprehension classes in your future. Try to follow along liberfake. Let me quote myself since you cannot read very well. "You have no additional information regarding the authenticity of the paid informants claims." Trying to prove the truthfullness of these paid informants by way of paid informant in england is completely idiotic. Try again.

The point flew completely over your head. Again, I cannot help that you did not finish school.

Yeah and AFTER SCHOOL you GROW UP. Something you still haven't done. You continue to eat regurgitated crap, instead of thinking for yourself. Thats the problem, you only know what you have been spoon fed, never had to think for yourself. That shows up here like a neon sign in a dark alley.

Again, I have provided plenty of objective, verifiable evidence that can be reproduced independently. You have failed to meet any of that criteria because you simply do not understand what it takes to make a solid, reasoned argument.

Whats the matter liberfake? Get caught with your pants down? :laugh:

Sorry but I just don't swing that way.

Actually, I am. Which is why I am still here ripping your ass a new one. Maybe you can check out a book on "Free Thinking" or something. The problem with that is, its not something learned in a book, you have to develop that skill on your own. Good luck, I'll be pulling for you!!! Go Liberfake! Go!

You're getting pummeled, badly, and you don't even realize it. You're truly a disgrace of a mod and, frankly, I have to seriously question your intelligence if you cannot understand some of the basic HS-level logic that has been presented to you. I'm almost afraid to hear what you'll say next because it's undoubtedly going to be stupider than your previous drivel. Though it has been fun smacking you around.

See the above bolded portion. I remind you and other posters that those with a "Mod" title are posting in threads as regular members unless specifically noted otherwise (as I am doing here.

Mod callout are prohibited and you've earned a little vacation time.

Fern
AnandTech P&N Moderator


 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Then you grow up.

Right, and that's something that you need to go through on your own. Stay in school I always say.

I did. Whats your excuse?

I don't like your spoon fed government socialists propaganda. You read it, continue in your "liberfakeness".

You don't like school books so I'm not surprised you don't like newspapers either I suppose. And lmao @ the WSJ being "socialist". Jesus Christ. :laugh:

Yep, I'm convinced, you're an idiot. You missed it again, go back and read what you deleted, not that you will get it, but do it anyway. Reading comprehension FTW!

No no, you don't get it, it describes you perfectly.

Your comebacks are horrid and unoriginal.

Same could be said for you.

I see reading comprehension classes in your future. Try to follow along liberfake. Let me quote myself since you cannot read very well. "You have no additional information regarding the authenticity of the paid informants claims." Trying to prove the truthfullness of these paid informants by way of paid informant in england is completely idiotic. Try again.

The point flew completely over your head. Again, I cannot help that you did not finish school.

No, just your point doesn't apply. Try again.

Yeah and AFTER SCHOOL you GROW UP. Something you still haven't done. You continue to eat regurgitated crap, instead of thinking for yourself. Thats the problem, you only know what you have been spoon fed, never had to think for yourself. That shows up here like a neon sign in a dark alley.

Again, I have provided plenty of objective, verifiable evidence that can be reproduced independently. You have failed to meet any of that criteria because you simply do not understand what it takes to make a solid, reasoned argument.

So you say, every asshole is entitled to an opinion.

Whats the matter liberfake? Get caught with your pants down? :laugh:

Sorry but I just don't swing that way.

Yeah you do, you whore yourself out to govenment slong every chance you get.

Actually, I am. Which is why I am still here ripping your ass a new one. Maybe you can check out a book on "Free Thinking" or something. The problem with that is, its not something learned in a book, you have to develop that skill on your own. Good luck, I'll be pulling for you!!! Go Liberfake! Go!

You're getting pummeled, badly, and you don't even realize it. You're truly a disgrace of a mod and, frankly, I have to seriously question your intelligence if you cannot understand some of the basic HS-level logic that has been presented to you. I'm almost afraid to hear what you'll say next because it's undoubtedly going to be stupider than your previous drivel. Though it has been fun smacking you around.
[/quote]

Maybe one day when you can think outside of a book you will be able to carry on a reasonable debate. Until then you will get slapped around like the spoon fed child you are. How about this liberfake, take your knowledge from regurgitated spew and look up free thinking as I suggested. Again though, I'm not sure you can be saved. Better repent :laugh:
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
I did. Whats your excuse?

You clearly didn't. I'm calling you a liar.

Yep, I'm convinced, you're an idiot. You missed it again, go back and read what you deleted, not that you will get it, but do it anyway. Reading comprehension FTW!

You wouldn't be able to point out what I missed if your life depended on it. Guaranteed. :laugh:

Same could be said for you.

False.

No, just your point doesn't apply. Try again.

There's nothing to try "again", it was tried once, I prevailed, and you dodged and deflected because you do not understand basic concepts such as probability (likelihood of undercover agents blatantly lying) or the law period (arresting people for what you ignorantly deemed "thought" crimes). Be hey, go start a thread about this and see how many people would side with 1) loony anarchists or 2) undercover agents with a reliable record. We all know you won't, guaranteed.

So you say, every asshole is entitled to an opinion.

That's right, and it's the only reason you exist here.

Yeah you do, you whore yourself out to govenment slong every chance you get.

Take the teabagging fantasies to the appropriate forum outside of AnandTech.

Maybe one day when you can think outside of a book you will be able to carry on a reasonable debate.

You can't think outside the box if you've never read a book in your life, so the conspiracy theory crap you parrot convinces no one intelligent here.

Until then you will get slapped around like the spoon fed child you are. How about this liberfake, take your knowledge from regurgitated spew and look up free thinking as I suggested. Again though, I'm not sure you can be saved. Better repent :laugh:

Man you are pathetic. :laugh:
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
I did. Whats your excuse?

You clearly didn't. I'm calling you a liar.

Prove it or STFU.

Yep, I'm convinced, you're an idiot. You missed it again, go back and read what you deleted, not that you will get it, but do it anyway. Reading comprehension FTW!

You wouldn't be able to point out what I missed if your life depended on it. Guaranteed. :laugh:

If you are too stupid to see it I don't have the time to teach you.

Same could be said for you.

False.

True.

No, just your point doesn't apply. Try again.

There's nothing to try "again", it was tried once, I prevailed, and you dodged and deflected because you do not understand basic concepts such as probability (likelihood of undercover agents blatantly lying) or the law period (arresting people for what you ignorantly deemed "thought" crimes). Be hey, go start a thread about this and see how many people would side with 1) loony anarchists or 2) undercover agents with a reliable record. We all know you won't, guaranteed.

Again you have nothing. 1)Prove these anarchists are loony and 2) Prove the paid informants have a "reliable record". We all know you can't, guaranteed.

So you say, every asshole is entitled to an opinion.

That's right, and it's the only reason you exist here.

Everyone is here to speak their opinion, except in your case, you're here to spew regurgitated government crap.


Yeah you do, you whore yourself out to govenment slong every chance you get.

Take the teabagging fantasies to the appropriate forum outside of AnandTech.

Thats your problem.

Maybe one day when you can think outside of a book you will be able to carry on a reasonable debate.

You can't think outside the box if you've never read a book in your life, so the conspiracy theory crap you parrot convinces no one intelligent here.

Talk about parrot :laugh: Pot meet kettle!

Until then you will get slapped around like the spoon fed child you are. How about this liberfake, take your knowledge from regurgitated spew and look up free thinking as I suggested. Again though, I'm not sure you can be saved. Better repent :laugh:

Man you are pathetic. :laugh:
[/quote]

Ahh but ya know, I'm happy. You on the other hand have to prove everything because your ego won't let go ;)

Here comes some more liberfake lies folks, stay tuned!......

 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Originally posted by: Evan Lieb
You're getting pummeled, badly, and you don't even realize it. You're truly a disgrace of a mod and, frankly, I have to seriously question your intelligence if you cannot understand some of the basic HS-level logic that has been presented to you. I'm almost afraid to hear what you'll say next because it's undoubtedly going to be stupider than your previous drivel. Though it has been fun smacking you around.

See the above bolded portion. I remind you and other posters that those with a "Mod" title are posting in threads as regular members unless specifically noted otherwise (as I am doing here.

Mod callout are prohibited and you've earned a little vacation time.

Fern
AnandTech P&N Moderator

That is absolutely, completely ridiculous. Have you taken a look at what the other party has stated to not just one but at least three other people in this thread?

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Both of you are retarded idiots. No one cares whether it happened at the DNC or RNC. The fact that these people were charged with thought crimes anywhere close to terrorism is a problem. Stick your head up your ass farther, I'm sure you're used to the smell of shit anyways.

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
the RNC 8 that was arrested didn't, either, dick. Stop trying to paint them as terrorists. They aren't and your support of this atrocity is sickening.

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
All I see in every thread you post in is government tyranny. You love it, you eat it up and make sure everyone knows it. Popping in threads to say "good". but thats not good enough, you continue to spew your hatred of liberty. Well I say go fuck yourself.

How about showing some respect for liberty? You don't know what that is do you? Go find yourself another pro government thread to puke on twit.

And nice personal insults. Can a MOD please inform this individual that it's against the forum rules? Oh snap.

I call them like I see them. Your and ignorant fucking government lapdog.

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
I don't give a rats fuck what you think I look like in these forums. What I do care about is your fake libertarian views being spewed as if you have some non-partisan viewpoint. Bullshit. They committed no crime other than thought crimes. Nothing had been done other than "talk" and to take it further, the information was from PAID INFORMANTS. Get a fucking clue.

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Yeah. Because someone allegedly thought about something and confided that thought to another person who is a PAID INFORMANT, they are guilty of conspiracy to riot in furtherance of terrorism. Hmm, thought police. If you can't put that together in your brain you need help. Specifically the part about IN FURTHERANCE OF TERRORISM. Get the fuck out of here. Anyone who from now on decides to protest against anything pro government will end up with this charge. America home of the free.....

And it's Evan Lieb's comment in passing that attracts attention? PC Surgeon should have been given a "vacation" eons before it got to the point that Evan Lieb made his comment. You are not exactly helping the "cover each others' asses no matter what" stigma assigned to moderators of these forums with completely nonsensical actions such as this. Address the problem instead of waging war on the symptoms.