I recently sent my eVGA 7900GTX for RMA under warranty due to artifact problems (i.e. it was slowly dieing). I just got an email that my replacement card has shipped, a 7950 GT KO Superclocked. Now I'm pretty sure from comparing the specs on the two cards that I'm getting a slower card back. I'm just not sure how much of a difference it really is, and if it's worth complaining about.
Old Card
eVGA 7900 GTX EGS
650 MHz Clock
512 MB 256-bit 1.2ns (16x32) GDDR3 Memory
800 MHz Clock - 1600 MHz Effective
51.2 GB/second memory bandwidth
Replacement Card
eVGA 7950 GT KO Superclocked
600 MHz Clock
512 MB 256-bit 1.4ns (8x64) GDDR3 Memory
725 MHz Clock - 1450 MHz Effective
46.4 GB/second memory bandwidth
I will say I'm not a mega-gamer - I mostly play WoW, and I have an NEC 20WMGX2 monitor (thanks to the reviews I read here!). I was considering upgrading both the monitor and the card later this year if NEC comes out with a 24" monitor.
Anyhow, I can see that all the numbers are lower/slower - any input on whether I should request a better card as a replacement? Or are the differences very small, and I should just be happy I have a non-artifacting video card?
Thanks in advance for any advice!
Anita
Old Card
eVGA 7900 GTX EGS
650 MHz Clock
512 MB 256-bit 1.2ns (16x32) GDDR3 Memory
800 MHz Clock - 1600 MHz Effective
51.2 GB/second memory bandwidth
Replacement Card
eVGA 7950 GT KO Superclocked
600 MHz Clock
512 MB 256-bit 1.4ns (8x64) GDDR3 Memory
725 MHz Clock - 1450 MHz Effective
46.4 GB/second memory bandwidth
I will say I'm not a mega-gamer - I mostly play WoW, and I have an NEC 20WMGX2 monitor (thanks to the reviews I read here!). I was considering upgrading both the monitor and the card later this year if NEC comes out with a 24" monitor.
Anyhow, I can see that all the numbers are lower/slower - any input on whether I should request a better card as a replacement? Or are the differences very small, and I should just be happy I have a non-artifacting video card?
Thanks in advance for any advice!
Anita