Originally posted by: Effect
Close, but if i remember right, the 7900gt has different memory (1.4ns?), which isn't easily capable of the high memory clocks on the gtx (1.1ns memory?). Apart from that, and the actual size of memory, yea, they use the same core. (I'm looking forward to the Gainward 7900gt 512mb GLH/golden sample, which is pretty much an undervolted 7900gtx (once again, uses SLIGHTLY slower memory, i think 1.2ns)).
I should prolly add i dont actually know what the 1.xns means, i'm guessing latency (1.2 nano seconds?), but it appears lower number = higher potential memory clocks.
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
Originally posted by: Effect
Close, but if i remember right, the 7900gt has different memory (1.4ns?), which isn't easily capable of the high memory clocks on the gtx (1.1ns memory?). Apart from that, and the actual size of memory, yea, they use the same core. (I'm looking forward to the Gainward 7900gt 512mb GLH/golden sample, which is pretty much an undervolted 7900gtx (once again, uses SLIGHTLY slower memory, i think 1.2ns)).
I should prolly add i dont actually know what the 1.xns means, i'm guessing latency (1.2 nano seconds?), but it appears lower number = higher potential memory clocks.
it determines the speeds of the memory:
1000/ns = rated speed
1000/1.4 =714 mhz rated frequency
1000/1.1 = 910 mhz rated frequency
Originally posted by: firewolfsm
why is it 1000?