bigsnyder
Golden Member
- Nov 4, 2004
- 1,568
- 2
- 81
Wait a minute everyone - I think we have to correct this - a 4850 and a 7850 cannot be crossfired, regardless of memory size.
Never say never
Wait a minute everyone - I think we have to correct this - a 4850 and a 7850 cannot be crossfired, regardless of memory size.
Never say never![]()
Chuck Norris can Tri-Fire 4850, 7850 and GTX 675MWait a minute everyone - I think we have to correct this - a 4850 and a 7850 cannot be crossfired, regardless of memory size.

Even if you could do this, it would probably be slower than a 7850 by itself. I imagine the 7850 would spend a lot of time waiting for the frame to be rendered by the 4850. But, you can't do that anyway, so it's all moot.![]()
Wow....so overclocking is hardder in crossfire? Well sorry to be cynical but no joke are you kidding? You can't get the same overclocks period with dual gpu, thats just a fact of life. Your 2 chips are different and when you are trying different voltages and clocks on both in crossfire or sli you are begging for problems. Fact of the matter is every chip has different quality and 1 chip that may do "X" speed, but when you try to crossfire it with another card and get Card 2 to also do "X" speed when it can't, boom, problems. I've dealt with this issue on a number of GPU's, happened with lightning sli's. Don't have grandiose and unrealistic expectations of overclocking with crossfire or sli. It won't be as good as single card if you can do it at all. You shouldn't expect much more than stock speeds if you're crossfiring, period.
Anyway, why not just opt for a 670 rather than 2 7850s? Seems to make more sense.
Ah okay I misunderstood. The impression I got was that it was due to not being able to OC in crossfire. Nevermind then.
From what I've read, my interpretation was that the lack of OC freedom via CFX was the straw that broke the camel's back. He got it to work after trying multiple driver revisions, and in the end he wasn't happy with the work and results. So why bother it anymore at that point?
As an AMD supporter it is a little defeating to see the number of "help my HD 78xx series has x-problem" that popped up after they launched.
Something seems to be screwy with the 78xx series. Being AMD's best price/perf card line up - they should really fix all known issues with them cards else they give up just more ground to NV.
So now i'm completely confused. So it was because of OC's? If it is, thats ridiculous, if its not that, apologies for my misunderstanding. Nevermind.
From what I've read, my interpretation was that the lack of OC freedom via CFX was the straw that broke the camel's back. He got it to work after trying multiple driver revisions, and in the end he wasn't happy with the work and results. So why bother it anymore at that point?
As an AMD supporter it is a little defeating to see the number of "help my HD 78xx series has x-problem" that popped up after they launched.
Something seems to be screwy with the 78xx series. Being AMD's best price/perf card line up - they should really fix all known issues with them cards else they give up just more ground to NV.
So now i'm completely confused. So it was because of OC's? If it is, thats ridiculous, if its not that, apologies for my misunderstanding. Nevermind.
I wish Xfire would work. Would love to see what 7850's could do at 1300
Adam did yu ever consider flashing them both to the asus top bios?
When i ran my 5770's in Tri i had them all flashed to the Asus top bios. Ran flawlessly overclocked that way
Already sent one back this morning.
My original card is going to be pushed tonight. If I feel I can get more, I may try the TOP bios, although I doubt it would do anything other than increase stock clocks.
They appear to be identical cards other than the OC.
Is there any difference between the TOP and the non-TOP bios aside from clockspeeds? I have the non-TOP bios and I can still use 1.3v.TOP bios is most beneficial to people who dont own an Asus card
