• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

7820 3dMark2001 on a 9500np??!?!?

S

scarfase99

Diamond Member
WTF??!?!? isnt this WAY LOW for my system?

XP 2000+
Gigabyte GA-7DX
256mb DDR Crucial
ATI 9500non-pro 64mb
DirectX 9.0

any ideas?
 
that doesn't sound too terribly out of the norm. the 64 MB non-pro 9500 should be slower than a ti4200. are you sure you have anti aliasing and anisotropoc filtering diabled?
 

I think it's some kinda low man.. Your machine is almost the same as mine but I'm using R8500LE and I got around 8000+ (not o/c'ed) and look how high I go in HERE

....... how was your system setting?
 
everything was set default on the test


oh, and btw, 3dmark 2003 wouldn't even complete, the error i get is: ""drawindexedprimitive failed""
 
Do you have the latest AGP driver installed (prior to Catalyst graphic driver installation), and if so are you sure you are running at least at 4X AGP?
 
my rig, xp1700@1.8ghz, Radeon 9500NP (softmodded to 9700PR0), gets 12.5K in 3dmark 2001, and 4600 in 3dmark 2003. Its decent, you should atelast be faster than a 8500LE.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top