7820 3dMark2001 on a 9500np??!?!?

[scarfase99]

WTF??!?!? isnt this WAY LOW for my system?

XP 2000+
Gigabyte GA-7DX
256mb DDR Crucial
ATI 9500non-pro 64mb
DirectX 9.0

any ideas?

 

[EdipisReks]

that doesn't sound too terribly out of the norm. the 64 MB non-pro 9500 should be slower than a ti4200. are you sure you have anti aliasing and anisotropoc filtering diabled?

 

[NEVERwinter]

I think it's some kinda low man.. Your machine is almost the same as mine but I'm using R8500LE and I got around 8000+ (not o/c'ed) and look how high I go in HERE

....... how was your system setting?

 

[scarfase99]

everything was set default on the test


oh, and btw, 3dmark 2003 wouldn't even complete, the error i get is: ""drawindexedprimitive failed""

 

[selfbuilt]

Do you have the latest AGP driver installed (prior to Catalyst graphic driver installation), and if so are you sure you are running at least at 4X AGP?

 

[human2k]

my rig, xp1700@1.8ghz, Radeon 9500NP (softmodded to 9700PR0), gets 12.5K in 3dmark 2001, and 4600 in 3dmark 2003. Its decent, you should atelast be faster than a 8500LE.