750ti OC(MAXWELL) vs 260x OC(Bonaire)

[csbin]

Source: http://bbs.pceva.com.cn/thread-110668-1-1.html

I7 4770K+750TI OC(1364MHZ): 2086
I5 4670K+260X OC(1300MHZ): 1996

750ti no 6pin

 

[ShintaiDK]

Would be much more ugly for the 260X without OC. No wonder the 265 just launched.

 

[coffeejunkee]

The 750Ti is overclocked too?

And doesn't the cpu play a big role in 3DMark too?

 

[The Alias]

Would be much more ugly for the 260X without OC. No wonder the 265 just launched.

they're both oc'ed

 

[ShintaiDK]

The 750Ti is overclocked too?

And doesn't the cpu play a big role in 3DMark too?

they're both oc'ed

12.4% OC for the 750Ti
20.9% OC for the 260X.

And we all know the chip lottery. So would be appropiate to run them at stock speeds for an actual compare.

 

[staryoshi]

The 750 Ti is of more interest to me than the 260X/265 given its epic TDP at this level of performance. It's great to see what they've accomplished while still using the 28nm process.

 

[coffeejunkee]

The 750 Ti is of more interest to me than the 260X/265 given its epic TDP at this level of performance. It's great to see what they've accomplished while still using the 28nm process.

It's a good result but the 750 Ti will likely need a pci-e connector for this overclock. Also, price will pay a role too.

Still, the biggest difference is in the physics test which is mostly cpu afaik.

 

[Rezist]

I find it hard to believe it got that high with no 6-pin. Unless the stock clocks are like 1.1 to 1.2 GHz.

 

[jpiniero]

Knowing nVidia, the 750 Ti is likely $150 and regular 750 $125.

 

[jpiniero]

I find it hard to believe it got that high with no 6-pin. Unless the stock clocks are like 1.1 to 1.2 GHz.

The OC cards will have to include it, but it would be optional.

 

[Ferzerp]

And doesn't the cpu play a big role in 3DMark too?

Yes. Or at least enough to make this "comparison" meaningless.

 

[96Firebird]

Yes. Or at least enough to make this "comparison" meaningless.

So look at the graphics score, first line.

 

[staryoshi]

It's a good result but the 750 Ti will likely need a pci-e connector for this overclock. Also, price will pay a role too.

Still, the biggest difference is in the physics test which is mostly cpu afaik.

Inclusion of a 6-pin connector is fine, as only power headroom will grow (not inherent power draw). It's possible that models without them will appear, but I find it likely that most will ship with one.

The 750 Ti even being compared to such GPUs is what impresses me, given its slim TDP. (R7 260X has a 115w TDP)

 

[el etro]

Very good.

260x(100W TDP and 85W gaming power consumption) is based on a 85W TDP chip(7790, the more power efficient chip of our time with a gaming power consumption of 70W) at its stock clocks(1000Mhz). If Nvidia managed to make a chip with a little power envelope(60W) have the same performance(and more perf/mm²), is their merit. Then the Maxwell card is gonna double the performance/watt of 260x at the same node. This is awesome.
I expect per now power consumption be between GTX 650 and GTX 650Ti levels(closer to GTX 650).



Geforce GTS 450(perf equals 9800GTX+) haves a TDP between 106W and 150W(nvidia not released the data, only states gaming power consumption is 106W). Radeon HD 7750 is 10 percent faster than GTS 450 and is tied with a TDP of 75W(Avg power consumption of 45W) on 28nm.

GTX 750 Non-Ti promises triple the performance of a GTS 450 under sub 75W TDP(and is half of GTS 450 TDP).
GTX 650 gaming power consumption is 50W(half of GTS 450 and with more performance). GTX 650, despise its 6-pin power connector, is a chip with same TDP and power characteristics of HD 7750.
With less or equal GTX 650 power consumption levels, GTX 750 is promising 6x more performance per watt than Fermi, that was maked on the less older node(40nm).

 

[Arkadrel]

Source: http://bbs.pceva.com.cn/thread-110668-1-1.html

I7 4770K+750TI OC(1364MHZ): 2086
I5 4670K+260X OC(1300MHZ): 1996

750ti no 6pin

Do you know how much CPU speed effects the total score?

That says NOTHING about how fast the GPUs are because,
the inflated score of a OVERCLOCKED 4770k @4.5ghz vs a 4670@stock.

Even the pure GPU score, is pretty effected by the CPU.
To make things even the only way to showcase them is to use the same system to test both.

 

[ShintaiDK]

Where does it say the 4670K is running at stock?

 

[Termie]

This is a flawed comparison for a number of reasons. Let's wait for official results.

The overclock on that 260X is extreme and in no way represents a realistic number. And yes, the overall score is affected by the different CPUs.

 

[Grooveriding]

Just wait for the reviews on Tuesday. Different CPUs, different motherboards, different memory and overclocks; all things that make a big difference in this benchmark.

 

[Skurge]

The 750Ti cards we have here use a 6pin and they are incredibly small. I'd show you pictures, but I'd rather not get in trouble.

 

[JBT]

But can it play Crisis mine scrypt?

 

[el etro]

The overclock on that 260X is extreme and in no way represents a realistic number. And yes, the overall score is affected by the different CPUs.

But how about the overclock on 750Ti? We know if it is extreme or not?

 

[Slomo4shO]

Would be much more ugly for the 260X without OC. No wonder the 265 just launched.

Eh?

12.4% OC for the 750Ti
20.9% OC for the 260X.

And we all know the chip lottery. So would be appropiate to run them at stock speeds for an actual compare.

Not sure where you are getting these figures... The boost clocks of the reference 750 Ti is 1085Mhz which would make the 1364MHz a 25.7% overclock... The reference boost clock of the R7 260X is 1100Mhz, 1300MHz would be a 18.2% overclock...

 

[RaulF]

Eh?


Not sure where you are getting these figures... The boost clocks of the reference 750 Ti is 1085Mhz which would make the 1364MHz a 25.7% overclock... The reference boost clock of the R7 260X is 1100Mhz, 1300MHz would be a 18.2% overclock...

Boom heatshot.

And like everyone else has mentioned, and i7 vs and i5.

 

[xpea]

hmmm...
galaxy-geforce-gtx-750-ti-exposed-can-overclocked-1-35-ghz
...impressive OC

 

[SPBHM]

not bad, it looks like Bonaire can keep up nicely with GM107

Bonaire has been on the market for almost a year,