Originally posted by: cdnbum88
I have had issues with a couple of 32 bit programs like my Pareto RegCure and Xsoft. They did not work and don't have a 64 bit version, so I am out of luck.
So, I think in some cases the 32 bit programs don't run in 64 bit mode.
Originally posted by: Zstream
Hmm, you ran them in compatibility mode as well?
Originally posted by: Avalon
BX510...if your 32bit programs won't run under Vista64, try enabling compatibility mode for XP 32bit on them. If that doesn't work, I'm not sure. I haven't come across a 32bit program that didn't run.
16bit on the other hand...not supported. I installed Windows 2000 in VMware to run the couple 16bit apps I had. Works nicely.
Bonzaiduck...most games that I know of work in Vista64. I've even been playing Lords of the Realm 2 (when did that come out, 1996?) without having to change a thing. You shouldn't have much trouble, unless the game has a 16bit installer like HOMM2 and the original C&C + Red Alert.
![]()
Originally posted by: cdnbum88
I have had issues with a couple of 32 bit programs like my Pareto RegCure and Xsoft. They did not work and don't have a 64 bit version, so I am out of luck.
So, I think in some cases the 32 bit programs don't run in 64 bit mode.
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky
I've had some trouble overall, but most well-written 32-bit software (like Adobe and Microsoft suites) works fine. What's most important is to make sure your basic utilities (AV, backup, etc) are 64-bit. Avast! has an excellent 64-bit AV program. I don't think Symantec does, but I won't put Symantec anything on my computers anyway.
Originally posted by: bharatwaja
.... the remaining BSODs are due to intel's "iastor.sys" or the Matrix storage manager.... and only once courtesy my OC
Originally posted by: cdnbum88
I have had issues with a couple of 32 bit programs like my Pareto RegCure and Xsoft. They did not work and don't have a 64 bit version, so I am out of luck.
So, I think in some cases the 32 bit programs don't run in 64 bit mode.
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Originally posted by: bharatwaja
.... the remaining BSODs are due to intel's "iastor.sys" or the Matrix storage manager.... and only once courtesy my OC
bharatwaja I recently started dealing with this issue, ony in my case I'm in 32bit XP Pro.
I am not overclocking the system that this issue (and wasn't overclocking it prior to the issue becoming an issue either).
It's been driving me nuts lately. Do you know any more about this? I would love to resolve the problem, whether it is to replace my hard-drive or mobo or replace some corrupted driver, etc. Right now I am operating in the dark while I try to debug my problem but the only feedback (naturally) is BSOD which means lost files and corrupt files over time.
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Im having a hell of a time finding a pattern in the issues as it seems to cross platforms and operating systems.
Originally posted by: Idontcare
My situation is one of those cases where I haven't touched the hardware or software end things since Jan of this year. I've got raptors in raid, all setup thru F6 proper-like on the XP install. Worked beautifully until about a month ago (roughly, can't recall when it specifically started).
Only thing I updated until then was just Windows updates, SP3, etc, whatever the updates took care of.
I first realized the source of the problem after I forced a reboot (hardlock, had to use the physical reset button) and after reboot XP popped up a window and said my iastore device was the culprit and took me to the Intel download site for new drivers. (which did not help the problem)
I did some more research this morning and there are tons of google links regarding this issue. There was one link that discussed the LPM (power savings mode) as the culprit and recommended a registry edit hack to get around it in XP. I just tried the hack and so far no issues. Oddly enough my system is acting like it is 2x as snappy as before I did the hack too. Keeping my fingers crossed.
Originally posted by: Idontcare
There was one link that discussed the LPM (power savings mode) as the culprit and recommended a registry edit hack to get around it in XP. I just tried the hack and so far no issues. Oddly enough my system is acting like it is 2x as snappy as before I did the hack too. Keeping my fingers crossed.
Originally posted by: Idontcare
There was one link that discussed the LPM (power savings mode) as the culprit and recommended a registry edit hack to get around it in XP. I just tried the hack and so far no issues. Oddly enough my system is acting like it is 2x as snappy as before I did the hack too. Keeping my fingers crossed.
The device, \Device\Ide\iaStor0, did not respond within the timeout period.
A change was made by Microsoft* in the Windows Vista setup process. The result of this change is that the Intel® Matrix Storage Manager Link Power Management (LPM) registry settings that were intended for mobile installations are added for desktop installations as well. These LPM registry settings are added for both the Intel® Matrix Storage Manager RAID driver on the Windows Vista installation disk, as well as for any drivers added during the installation process.
Various desktop Serial ATA devices such as hard drives and CD/DVD drives have been reported that do not comply with the Serial ATA LPM device specification and display erratic behavior when LPM is enabled.
Because the setup change means that LPM is enabled by default for all Windows Vista platforms, using a device that does not completely follow the specification may result in one of the listed issues.
http://www.intel.com/support/c.../imsm/sb/cs-025783.htm
I installed the latest drivers from Intel in an attempt to resolve this issue with no luck. I am pretty sure that I solved the issue on my two computers by renaming this registry key:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\iaStor\Parameters]
to
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\iaStor\Parameters.Bad]
Then reboot and see if that fixes your problem. Good Luck!
http://www.paulscomputerservic...os/intelSataError9.php
Originally posted by: bharatwaja
Doesn't this imply that there is something wrong with the Intel Matrix storage manager drivers specifically?
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Originally posted by: bharatwaja
Doesn't this imply that there is something wrong with the Intel Matrix storage manager drivers specifically?
It would appear so. I had hoped the integrated graphics team wasn't allowed to co-mingle with the ICH team but I guess you can't keep them from fraternizing after hours.
