WTF are you talking about here Joe?There is another thing: 3000+ are actually cache defective 3200+, according to many. If that is the case I kind of doubt these are chips that are equal every other way to 3200+ meaning whatever AMD say, I would not trust.
AMI bios calls it 2:1, that is the way it is in the bios. 400 versus 200, 2:1, as AMI bios sees it.So memclock to cpu ratio 2:1 (DDR 400) is for PC3200? I thought the Athlon 64 had a 200 mhz fsb so the ram should run at 1:1
Looks like 3000+ are the cache defective 3200+. That is what many think, I don't know whether it is or not. Now if a chip came out with defective cache do you think it is otherwise just the same as the one that came out fine? I kind of doubt but hey, it is only me.WTF are you talking about here Joe?
Originally posted by: joe2004
AMI bios calls it 2:1, that is the way it is in the bios. 400 versus 200, 2:1, as AMI bios sees it.So memclock to cpu ratio 2:1 (DDR 400) is for PC3200? I thought the Athlon 64 had a 200 mhz fsb so the ram should run at 1:1
Looks like 3000+ are the cache defective 3200+. That is what many think, I don't know whether it is or not. Now if a chip came out with defective cache do you think it is otherwise just the same as the one that came out fine? I kind of doubt but hey, it is only me.WTF are you talking about here Joe?
If airliner tells you - this airplane has two engines that work and the other two malfunctioned so we just keep them for decoration, it is equally good as the one with four engines, just a little slower, you have 30% discount - would you fly in it?
Originally posted by: Markfw900
I got my HTT to 220, but it crashes in 3d apps. I think the video card doesn't like the AGP bus that fast. 217 works good though (2170) in anything. May have to change my sig......