- Oct 18, 2006
- 2
- 0
- 0
I know I've seen a lot of people speak somewhat poorly of the 6200 series, but my aging ti 4200 died and I'm really on a tight budget and the next up is a 6600 for double the price.
So right now I'm looking at a 6200 128 meg for 47 bucks vs the ddr2 256 for 58 bucks. This is in canada (toronto) and the next card up is a 6600 which is 104 bucks.
I can't find benchmarks anywhere for the 256 meg version of this card. Does anyone have any insight if it helps this card much? I mainly play enemy territory still (which s/b no prob even for this budget card) but wouldn't mind games like doom3, hl2, splinter cell ct working at somewhat acceptable frame rates. I don't even mind 640x480 with med details as long as the fps are at least 30s. Btw, this is the agp version which obviously limits my options. And neither of these cards are of the turbo cache variety which I've read is even worse.
Here are the two cards I'm referring to:
http://www.xfxforce.com/web/product/lis...ails.jspa?productConfigurationId=79772
http://www.xfxforce.com/web/product/lis...tails.jspa?productConfigurationId=1087
So right now I'm looking at a 6200 128 meg for 47 bucks vs the ddr2 256 for 58 bucks. This is in canada (toronto) and the next card up is a 6600 which is 104 bucks.
I can't find benchmarks anywhere for the 256 meg version of this card. Does anyone have any insight if it helps this card much? I mainly play enemy territory still (which s/b no prob even for this budget card) but wouldn't mind games like doom3, hl2, splinter cell ct working at somewhat acceptable frame rates. I don't even mind 640x480 with med details as long as the fps are at least 30s. Btw, this is the agp version which obviously limits my options. And neither of these cards are of the turbo cache variety which I've read is even worse.
Here are the two cards I'm referring to:
http://www.xfxforce.com/web/product/lis...ails.jspa?productConfigurationId=79772
http://www.xfxforce.com/web/product/lis...tails.jspa?productConfigurationId=1087