Originally posted by: dabuddha
Yeah I saw that. That's messed up.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
They covered up what they did, including erasing the ID marks on the vehicles.
If they'd just done the scrounging without the cover-up they might not have been charged.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
They covered up what they did, including erasing the ID marks on the vehicles.
If they'd just done the scrounging without the cover-up they might not have been charged.
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
They covered up what they did, including erasing the ID marks on the vehicles.
If they'd just done the scrounging without the cover-up they might not have been charged.
I disagree. It is commonplace to re-id the vehicles and "cover-up" your illegal requisitions. You need to read more Vietnam history.
"Taking the trucks in my mind was not the worst thing they did," Wicker said from Fort Hood, Texas, where he is now with the Army's 13th Corps Support Command.
Originally posted by: edro13
if the rules were broken for a good reason, they would have gotten through the court marshal without punishment.
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?
The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.
The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.
So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?
The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.
The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.
So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.
So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?
The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.
The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.
So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.
So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?
If they had followed military regs, there wouldn't have been any problems.
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?
The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.
The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.
So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.
So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?
If they had followed military regs, there wouldn't have been any problems.
If they had followed military regs, they wouldn't have had the proper equipment either.
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?
The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.
The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.
So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.
So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?
If they had followed military regs, there wouldn't have been any problems.
If they had followed military regs, they wouldn't have had the proper equipment either.
How so? If all they did was scrap abandoned vehicles for part, they would have been given a medal for their resourcefulness.
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
"Had they followed the regulations..."
They might not be alive to be dismissied. :roll: