• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

6 Court-Martialed for Scrounging Equipment

They covered up what they did, including erasing the ID marks on the vehicles.

If they'd just done the scrounging without the cover-up they might not have been charged.
 
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
They covered up what they did, including erasing the ID marks on the vehicles.

If they'd just done the scrounging without the cover-up they might not have been charged.

I disagree. It is commonplace to re-id the vehicles and "cover-up" your illegal requisitions. You need to read more Vietnam history.
 
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
They covered up what they did, including erasing the ID marks on the vehicles.

If they'd just done the scrounging without the cover-up they might not have been charged.

Yep ... some bad decisions here. I suspect there is more to the story.
 
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
They covered up what they did, including erasing the ID marks on the vehicles.

If they'd just done the scrounging without the cover-up they might not have been charged.

I disagree. It is commonplace to re-id the vehicles and "cover-up" your illegal requisitions. You need to read more Vietnam history.

Undoubtably, and clearly not getting caught is always superior to getting caught and being able to talk your way out of it.

However, if you DO get caught...it looks a lot better if you didn't cover it up, and claim it was necessary.
 
"Taking the trucks in my mind was not the worst thing they did," Wicker said from Fort Hood, Texas, where he is now with the Army's 13th Corps Support Command.

Apparently the Army feels that they should have given the vehicles back to their rightful owners rather than scrub the ID numbers and dump them off base.
 
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?
 
If that is the Reserves Base next to the Fairgrounds... my grandparents live 2 miles down the road 🙂

The army has rules for a reason... if the rules were broken for a good reason, they would have gotten through the court marshal without punishment.
 
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?


The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.

The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.

So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.
 
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?


The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.

The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.

So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.


So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?
 
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?


The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.

The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.

So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.


So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?

If they had followed military regs, there wouldn't have been any problems.
 
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?


The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.

The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.

So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.


So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?

If they had followed military regs, there wouldn't have been any problems.

If they had followed military regs, they wouldn't have had the proper equipment either.
 
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?


The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.

The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.

So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.


So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?

If they had followed military regs, there wouldn't have been any problems.

If they had followed military regs, they wouldn't have had the proper equipment either.

How so? If all they did was scrap abandoned vehicles for part, they would have been given a medal for their resourcefulness.
 
Of COURSE the military salvages parts and canabalizes from damaged vehicles, but what kind of supply system could you possibly have if every soldier started lifting parts they felt they needed from anything they saw as 'abandoned'?

They are being court-marshalled exactly as if they had fallen asleep at their post, or mouthed off to a superior officer. The military doesn't play around with rules.

Had they followed the regulations, instead of trying to 'erase' the vehicles from military records, they might have gotten a commendation for resourcefulness and getting the job done. Or maybe they would have pulled KP duty as punishment. At the very least, I doubt we would be reading about their court-marshall.
 
"Hey, we need a coupla trucks to bring some gas up into Iraq. We found a couple of them with your unit's name on them down here in Kuwait. Want us to bring them to you after we use them? Okay, thanks, I'll see you in a week assuming nobody hits the fuel truck with an RPG."
 
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: CaptainGoodnight
Originally posted by: rh71
attempting to cover their asses was wrong... but what's wrong with borrowing "abandoned" vehicles ?


The military is (justifiably) very concerned with anyone caught tampering with military equipment and ESPECIALLY tampering with military records.

The problem (and reason they were court marshal), was not so much that they comandeered equipment, but that they then rendered that equipment unusable for their fellow soldiers who might also need it later. Add to that the fact that they grossly violated military rules by tampering with ID tags, and conspiring to cover their tracks by ensuring that the vehicles WERE NOT LOCATED.

So yes, these reservists DID use the vehicles. Then tried to make sure no one else could.


So if they would have just brought the vehicles back, there wouldn't have been any problem?

If they had followed military regs, there wouldn't have been any problems.

If they had followed military regs, they wouldn't have had the proper equipment either.

How so? If all they did was scrap abandoned vehicles for part, they would have been given a medal for their resourcefulness.

So your saying there is a 100% chance they would have been allowed to part those exact vehicles?
 
how can you steal an abandoned vehicle?

http://dictionary.reference.co...arch?r=2&q=abandon

a·ban·don ( P ) Pronunciation Key (-bndn)
tr.v. a·ban·doned, a·ban·don·ing, a·ban·dons
To withdraw one's support or help from, especially in spite of duty, allegiance, or responsibility; desert: abandon a friend in trouble.
To give up by leaving or ceasing to operate or inhabit, especially as a result of danger or other impending threat: abandoned the ship.
To surrender one's claim to, right to, or interest in; give up entirely. See Synonyms at relinquish.
To cease trying to continue; desist from: abandoned the search for the missing hiker.
To yield (oneself) completely, as to emotion.
 
Whoa, seems pretty big in that a cheif warrant officer and other officers were convicted.

It seems like with all of the problems going on in Iraq that this should be the least of their concerns. Some soliders find abandoned equipment and make use of then get court martialed???
I suppose a court martial is better than getting killed in action.
 
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
"Had they followed the regulations..."


They might not be alive to be dismissied. :roll:

Have you people been listening to what I've said?

You can't just take stuff in the real Army (particularly something as expensive as a vehicle) without there being someone accountable for it--someone who will get in serious trouble if they can't account for it. The abandoned vehicles in question were signed for by someone at some point, and likely would have been recovered and returned to their proper unit eventually. The Army can't do that if someone stole them for his unit. Conversely, if I'm in command of a unit and I'm signed for 5 vehicles and my unit for reasons I can't document now has 7 of them, I can get into trouble. The Army logistics people loathe hoarding, and for very practical reasons.

Now, had I been in their shoes, I would have probably taken the vehicles, completed the mission, and then let chain of command know who the vehicles belonged to and where I got them. At that point the chain of command can decide if I have to return the vehicles to their proper unit. If returning them puts me in a tight spot, well that's my tough luck--something I should have considered a possibility before I appropriated the vehicles.
 
Back
Top