• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

550 vs. 650

The 650W is rated for 100W more....I wouldn't really say either is better performance wise...but the 650W obviously is good for 100W more. They are made by different OEMs though.
 
do both work with cheap back-ups (non-sine wave)? pure-sine battery backups are significant expenses. usually active PFC 85-94% like to see a pure-sine. tolerance is something that can vary within a single product batch.

Keep in mind the reason to right-size is simple. the 80-94% efficient power supplies are not efficient at 40% load. So when you do redundant power these days you want to run one at like 6% and the other at 94% to maximize the efficiency rather than a 50/50 load which results in two power supplies being inefficient.

efficiency maps are a good place to start to look.
 
Most power supplies are MOST efficient at 50% load...they are less efficient at low loads and high loads....who said anything about redundant PSUs?
 
Thanks guys, so the conclusion in this case, go for more horsepower. Calculated my usage at about 320 watts with this upcoming system, so the 650 seems the right choice.
 
Keep in mind the reason to right-size is simple. the 80-94% efficient power supplies are not efficient at 40% load.



Sorry, but where do you get your misinformation?

A power supply Bronze rated in efficiency is rated at 20%, 50%, and 100% of rated output and must be 82%, 85%, and 82% efficient at those loads.

"Regular" 80Plus cert. is 80% across all the above mentioned loads.

Silver is 85%, 88%, 85% efficiency across those loads.

Gold is 87%, 90%, 87% efficiency across those same 20%, 50%, and 100% of rated output loads.

So, given the above figures, how can a power supply that's rated for any 80Plus certification level be inefficient at 40% of rated capacity.

Now, if you'd said 10% of rated output, then you'd have a point due to most power supplies being quite inefficient below 20% of rated output, but some new units on the market do indeed manage to maintain >80% efficiency even at 10% loads.
 
Back
Top